I'm only quoting Crys here, but I'm too lazy to copy and delete things ten times in a row. Anyways, first significant post from Crys in a while is making a case on me, when it's absolutely necessary that he do so as one of the unclears:
Jumps on a bandwagon, just to say that he's uncertain. Trying to distance himself from a very bad bandwagon in way to seem pro-town, which you are not.
It's day 1 and there's no way I could have been very certain about anyone the way I was when there was more information, such as day 2 with Endless. Thus begins your cherry picking of my large amount of posts to try and paint me as having been anti-town all along. As it stands, I was being pro-town in joining the Dolby wagon because all town can do and should do on day 1 is lynch the person who has presented the most suspicious or unusual behavior in the entire game so far and knowing that even if this is a mislynch (which it usually is), it's getting information and establishing interactions and stances people have made. At this point in the game, looking back on the Dolby lynch has indeed given me information now that it's narrowed down to three unclears: one (me) was lynching based on the intentions stated above, one didn't vote at all (you), and one automatically seemed to know it wasn't Dolby and instead randomvoted me to 'bait reactions' thus distracting from the fact that in reality he just had given little reads and taken no stances at all (Tom).
He got on the Dolby lynch for wanting to lynch Ash based on meta but then says he should had relied on his meta feelings, it's a contradiction in some way. Sounds like he was making excuses for his voting and trying to seem as town.
Lynching somebody solely on meta is different than being hesitant to lynch somebody based on meta - one is more harmful than the other. And I was just reflecting on my choice by saying I should have relied on my meta feelings: Dolby hasn't played in a while and is therefore coming from the old piss-poor-play tbt mafia generation when people actually did just lynch inactives and random lynched day 1. Had I chosen to latch onto another candidate, it might have been a successful lynch. In short, I wasn't excusing my play, but just evaluating for myself what I did wrong for future improvement.
I feel like in this quote he's trying to hard at distancing himself from being Maf. It just seems fake.
No, that's not what I was doing. What can't be seen there is that I was quoting Rune talking about thinking it could have been a conspiracy between Ender and Endless (to clear Ender), and why I pointed out based on the assumption that they were experienced players that bussing for clearing yourself and sacrificing KP for it is bad play (such as mine in KtbC), which is why I thought that's not what was going on. Turns out I was right, given Blu's inspection result on Ender.
Forek clearly say that he's a ONE shot vig, but Dad still thinks he's got ammo. Mad bc you didn't get to kill him that night?
Ah, here's a nice example of bad quote fishing. Why? In that first quote, I posted before Ender confirmed that he was protected, which is what confirmed Forek. Meaning before Ender confirmed Forek I had the right to suspect Forek was claiming the one-shot vig and making Ashtot the kill as maf to buy time. In that second quote, I'm just annoyed with Forek for outing at night when there was no reason to do so. And there wasn't.
Seems that in this post he wants Fel to be modkilled when it would just lower towns numbers. This post seems a little passive aggressive to me.
That wasn't passive aggression it was straightforward aggression, it was unfair that just because she posted twice promising activity but giving none, and then not voting, she was deserving of a free pass as compared to Cocoabean.
I don't even know what this is supposed to mean but it makes me uneasy.
9/11 joke, shamelessly in poor taste.
Says we need to find the roleblocker but still votes for Labelle, that's so counter productive. I feel like he went for the easy lynch when there was so many other variables to be accounted for but went for the Labelle lynch without a second thought.
Of course we needed to hope that if she was maf she was roleblocker, because that would be a great boon to our cop. There were many variables that I've posted about earlier but of course one of those variables turned out to be me being wrong about you and townreading you out of the three, and Tom would follow LaBelle's lynch in my mind, so also considering Rune's flip I did head straight for LaBelle, but second thought requires new information that never developed over the day, which was quiet as hell.
Anyways, nice try with making a case against me to persuade town I'm scum rather than you. You go for me first because Tom is your bus that you'll have to develop a read for, since from your point of view you would be the only town. But you aren't, and unlike me fail to give a read on Tom until now.
