I'd say we should stage an intervention to just policy lynch you and Oath whenever you rest on your blindly accepted laziness meta until you change your ways but the two of you rarely seem to play. Kayla probably wouldn't believe it when I say this but if she wants to lynch people who coast you two should be the ones to consider because we can be certain it doesn't have to do with being new to the game.
You're right I don't believe it. I would hardly say I'm coasting by. Literally within hours of the game I was forced into the spotlight and had to fight my way through, explaining why I wanted a lynch I suggested. Had I been guided I obviously wouldn't have been that dumb to gather that much attention onto myself immediately. Also, I was not aware and am still not fully aware of the way people play. You guys told me there are many more stronger players, so the typical lynching policy of 2014 no longer applies. Lynching players deemed to be useless was extremely common back then. On top of that, in all of my games I was a strong advocate for that. We were always left with useless sheep-like players at the end back then.
Here we go again though, someone bringjng up the whole "Kayla wants to lynch deadweights". Since you did, I need to bring this up:
I want to bring up two points that I think need to be reviewed:
-Inactives ( hear me out )
-Bandwagoners
Starting with my favourite topic: inactives.
At the beginning
Dolby and I made such a big deal going back and forth on players who are useless at endgame / inactives. Literally everyone was screaming "omg we are not lynching inactives". So if we use a little reverse psychology .. wouldn't that give mafia a place to hide ? Players are literally saying what they won't do, at least for Day One lynch. Would that explain why people are being oddly quiet ? Help me out, people who know some of these players' play styles.
Now for bandwagoners .. there are moments in this game that stand out as moments where mafia members may have seen an opportunity to post at an attempt of hiding or blending in.
- People using fillers in their post against the way I wanted to lynch even though I had dropped it.
When I moved on from discussing the lynch and started calling people out, there was a mini wave of players who decided to rehash the arguments from the big debate. Specifically
Dolby's statements. Now given that players had already mentioned that they were leaning Town for
Dolby and that it appeared he was actively scum hunting. That could have been a way for them to sneak some Town credit through filler posts.
1. Several players bandwagoning against my lynching views
I truly believe certain players were filling up their posts with differently worded statements from the
Dolby arguments. They were just repeating things to add content in my opinion. Considering he was openly discussed as
leaning Town other players could definitely take the opportunity to mimic his behaviour / views in the thread to create seemingly pro-Town posts. Players that fall in this category for me are:
mogyay,
Ryumia and
Toad a tiny bit. At the moment
Toad is my least suspected.
This does not mean I am dropping the people I suspect from my previous post.
