AC Timeline

[Megamannt125]

After alot of thinking I have come to the conclusion that the Animal Crossing games actually follow a timeline.
Animal Forest: The first of course
Animal Crossing: This one takes place after AF and the Shrine has been replaced by a well
Animal Crossing City Folk: The cliffs have gotten smaller do to erosion and the Train Station was replaced by the Town Gate and the Wishing Well was replaced by the Town Hall.
Animal Crossing Wild World: The Cliffs have completely eroded away and they destroyed the Bus Station to use a much cheaper, Cab. Harriet moves her shop out of the city as she states when your first meet her in Wild World also.

There might not be any timeline or anything because AC has no story and this makes no sense, but I thought of this when I learned Harriet works in the City in City Folk. It would also explain the cliffs getting smaller then turning into a flat world. And this explains the 4 houses seperating from each other then being knocked down and turned into one big house.

 

[coffeebean!]

Interesting way of thinking mega.....o.o

 

[Jas0n]

You look too much into things xD

 

[Princess]

very depth-ical (is that a word?!? ) you get the idea ^__^

 

[Jeremy]

Actually you list is missing a lot B-)

(2 Japanese games)

 

[bloodbend3r]

wow. i never thought of this. pretty clever

 

[D.T.]

I actually find myself thinking about this a lot. I just ignore Animal Forest.

Seems to me that Animal Crossing GCN should come last and Wild World should come first. Wild World doesn't have the lighthouse or fountain. In City Folk, the lighthouse and fountain are built...and in ACGCN, the lighthouse and fountain are there (wishing well is the fountain), there's a train, and the police station. The police station seems much more modern than the old-fashioned clothes the guards use at the gate.

But then we can also use the episodes...the episodes mention that Nook worked in the city for a time, but in all three games he's in the town. The city doesn't exist except in City Folk, which might imply that City Folk came first, then Nook went to the city for a little while, then moved back, which brings us to WW, then ACGCN.

But that's probably wrong considering villagers talk about Nook like he's already had a wild past and mention that the person to ask about Nook is Sable, who was the one that told us that he went to the city in WW, and Sable will probably say the same thing, so Nook probably already went to the city and came back before City Folk...

We can also look at Kapp'n. On one of the bus rides Kapp'n mentions that he used to have his own boat, then he tried driving a cab, now he drives a bus. That pretty much states that the order goes ACGCN, WW, and ACCF.

All of these things conflict and that leads me to believe that there is no official order at all. It's still fun to speculate, though.

 

[Bazzel]

Animal Forest e+ included yet more new features such the ability to take pictures of village life, visit the island with-out a GameBoy, download mini-games to your GameBoy, along with many new items, conversation topics, and new character designs.

Apperently there are more Animal Forests o.o

 

[Micah]

Does it matter?

 

[Bazzel]

Does it matter?

Stormcommander:

Actually you list is missing a lot B-)

 

[Garrett x50 cal]

You look too much into things xD

And you don't?

 

[Jas0n]

You look too much into things xD

And you don't?

When have I ever looked too much into something on this forum

 

[Garrett x50 cal]

You look too much into things xD

And you don't?

When have I ever looked too much into something on this forum

The time I said "I double posted sorry" and you said

(real quote by the way)
"EDIT: And it's strange that the time between those other 2 posts is so far apart, if it came out 2 times the time would be 1 minute apart at the most >_>

^ that's looking to much into something


]http://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7078150/1/[/url]

 

[Jas0n]

You look too much into things xD

And you don't?

When have I ever looked too much into something on this forum

The time I said "I double posted sorry" and you said

(real quote by the way)
"EDIT: And it's strange that the time between those other 2 posts is so far apart, if it came out 2 times the time would be 1 minute apart at the most >_>

^ that's looking to much into something


]http://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7078150/1/[/url]

Not really, I just looked at the times because you was trying to make yourself look better when infact you were just lying, and I hate liars. You just bumped up your thread 3 times and said "oh sorry it came out twice" when it actual fact you just posted again the next day >_>

 

[Garrett x50 cal]

You look too much into things xD

And you don't?

When have I ever looked too much into something on this forum

The time I said "I double posted sorry" and you said

(real quote by the way)
"EDIT: And it's strange that the time between those other 2 posts is so far apart, if it came out 2 times the time would be 1 minute apart at the most >_>

^ that's looking to much into something


]http://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7078150/1/[/url]

Not really, I just looked at the times because you was trying to make yourself look better when infact you were just lying, and I hate liars. You just bumped up your thread 3 times and said "oh sorry it came out twice" when it actual fact you just posted again the next day >_>

Do you have enough free time on your hands that you really needed to find that out? Thats pretty sad indeed. :'(

 

[Jas0n]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

When have I ever looked too much into something on this forum

The time I said "I double posted sorry" and you said

(real quote by the way)
"EDIT: And it's strange that the time between those other 2 posts is so far apart, if it came out 2 times the time would be 1 minute apart at the most >_>

^ that's looking to much into something


]http://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7078150/1/[/url]

Not really, I just looked at the times because you was trying to make yourself look better when infact you were just lying, and I hate liars. You just bumped up your thread 3 times and said "oh sorry it came out twice" when it actual fact you just posted again the next day >_>

Do you have enough free time on your hands that you really needed to find that out? Thats pretty sad indeed. :'(

No, what's sad is you. Why am I sad for taking 5 seconds to look at the times in which you posted instead of coming up with some lame excuse to try and stop people disliking me? xD

 

[Garrett x50 cal]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

The time I said "I double posted sorry" and you said

(real quote by the way)
"EDIT: And it's strange that the time between those other 2 posts is so far apart, if it came out 2 times the time would be 1 minute apart at the most >_>

^ that's looking to much into something


]http://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7078150/1/[/url]

Not really, I just looked at the times because you was trying to make yourself look better when infact you were just lying, and I hate liars. You just bumped up your thread 3 times and said "oh sorry it came out twice" when it actual fact you just posted again the next day >_>

Do you have enough free time on your hands that you really needed to find that out? Thats pretty sad indeed. :'(

No, what's sad is you. Why am I sad for taking 5 seconds to look at the times in which you posted instead of coming up with some lame excuse to try and stop people disliking me? xD

Did you have a stopwatch with you? Was it really 5 secs? :gyroidconfused:

Still, you could have just let the topic die, but no. You have to take a "5 sec" look and start it all up again, and that is indeed sad.

 

[Jas0n]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deephttp://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7078150/1/

Not really, I just looked at the times because you was trying to make yourself look better when infact you were just lying, and I hate liars. You just bumped up your thread 3 times and said "oh sorry it came out twice" when it actual fact you just posted again the next day >_>

Do you have enough free time on your hands that you really needed to find that out? Thats pretty sad indeed. :'(

No, what's sad is you. Why am I sad for taking 5 seconds to look at the times in which you posted instead of coming up with some lame excuse to try and stop people disliking me? xD

Did you have a stopwatch with you? Was it really 5 secs? :gyroidconfused:

Still, you could have just let the topic die, but no. You have to take a "5 sec" look and start it all up again, and that is indeed sad.

It wasn't going to be dead anyway ;S

And yes it does take 5 seconds to look above the persons post to see when they posted, try it for yourself ;D

 

[Garrett x50 cal]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deephttp://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7078150/1/

Do you have enough free time on your hands that you really needed to find that out? Thats pretty sad indeed. :'(

No, what's sad is you. Why am I sad for taking 5 seconds to look at the times in which you posted instead of coming up with some lame excuse to try and stop people disliking me? xD

Did you have a stopwatch with you? Was it really 5 secs? :gyroidconfused:

Still, you could have just let the topic die, but no. You have to take a "5 sec" look and start it all up again, and that is indeed sad.

It wasn't going to be dead anyway ;S

And yes it does take 5 seconds to look above the persons post to see when they posted, try it for yourself ;D

@t wasn't going to be dead anyway ;S

Yes it would have. Everyone would have went back to posting there FCs, but you had you bring up the arguement AGAIN! You can never "let sleeping dogs lie."

 

[Jas0n]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deephttp://forums.the-bell-tree.com?topic=7078150/1/

No, what's sad is you. Why am I sad for taking 5 seconds to look at the times in which you posted instead of coming up with some lame excuse to try and stop people disliking me? xD

Did you have a stopwatch with you? Was it really 5 secs? :gyroidconfused:

Still, you could have just let the topic die, but no. You have to take a "5 sec" look and start it all up again, and that is indeed sad.

It wasn't going to be dead anyway ;S

And yes it does take 5 seconds to look above the persons post to see when they posted, try it for yourself ;D

@t wasn't going to be dead anyway ;S

Yes it would have. Everyone would have went back to posting there FCs, but you had you bring up the arguement AGAIN! You can never "let sleeping dogs lie."

Neither can you by the looks of things.