ACWW vs CF: 2016

[CookieCrossing]

I fear my game cartridge for ACNL, which I have had since release, may be reaching its end. I hope this is not the case and I may be over-exagerrating, but if it is I am not willing to unlock everything again. I'm just giving up on NL if it breaks.

If it does, I will play WW or CF and use a third-party wifi program. Which game do you think is better to play now? I don't care about graphics.

 

[Becca617]

It really depends on what you like in an animal crossing game. if you like more dialogue variety within the villagers, i'd have to say then go with wild world. City folk and wild world have the same hourly music, except city folk.. has a city obviously lol if you like going places outside of your town that doesn't require wifi, i'd say city folk although i'd say the city is quite small. city folk is also home console if you prefer to play handheld, which is wild world. the grass deterioration in city folk is really bad as well while in wild world there's none.

i honestly love both of them very much and i encourage you to try both of them at some point but i'd say you'd enjoy wild world more.

 

[YetAgain]

City Folk all the way.

 

[Mars Adept]

CF improved on some things such as having different types of shoes, mii masks, and Wi-Fi before it got discontinued. WW has really good villager dialogue compared to CF and especially NL. CF is on a console, and WW is on a handheld. Most people find it a step down from NL, but I thought NL was too far away from Animal Crossing's roots, so I find the games to be decent. It's up to you. Which one you would like better depends on how you play.

Also, on a side note, WW has a bad framerate, so you might want to get CF if that would annoy you.