All those reviews...

[Silver]

Hi...
I've been watching several reviews of ACCF, but they are all so negatief! :throwingrottenapples:
Please tell me the game isn't that bad
The only thing i hear is that there is almost no difference between the previous versions.

So for the people who have the game: Is it really that bad?

 

[sidorak19]

Well here is what I say there is no such thing as a bad or good review there is only such thing as a opinion.=)

 

[Tola]

It's not bad. The reviews have negative things to say, but they can't get negative enough because every Animal Crossing game is good in its own way. This DOES seem like a port of the last game, but it's got an expansive town, the city, and great new online features. It's worht it, else we wouldn't be here.

 

[Silver]

I'll get the game anyway... i love AC no matter how much it is the same ^_^

 

[Tola]

Ignore it if you must - they're just whining that it isn't core enough.

 

[sidorak19]

Something that arises is they always rate the graphics to the best graphic game. but AC isn't meant to have over the top graphics.

 

[Tola]

Something that arises is they always rate the graphics to the best graphic game. but AC isn't meant to have over the top graphics.

Correct. It's not.

 

[sidorak19]

Tola I'm confused are you agreeing with me?

 

[Tola]

Yes. It is not meant to have over-the-top graphics.

 

[Megamannt125]

they give it a bad review most of the time because City Folk is basically a upgraded version of Wild World, if you were to compare GC to City Folk and WW to City Folk you would see what I am talking about. Game Reviewers like games to have a good amount of change and keeping to the basics of the first game at the same time.