Brawl Double Review!

[TwilightKing]

This is Me and Shadow_Link's first video review, and it's of course, of Super Smash Bros Brawl. Tell us what you think, if you agree with our final scores, and I hope you enjoy




Note: Please be aware that there are spoilers such as the final roster.

Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjZ_xivWscE

Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONp06-HsrqI&feature=related

 

[Kyle]

Heh, stormman.
New nickname for him.
I find that a good rating though.

 

[Snoopdogga]

9.8/10 is a very accurate rating in my opinion.
I skipped parts of the videos because I wanted to play Cruis'n USA.

 

[SL92]

The name was changed to Nintendo Weelkly when I wasn't looking?




Yeah, that's basically the deadliest review ever. I wasn't ready a couple of times, as you can plainly hear when I'm explaining the replays >.< I'm content with my final score.

 

[Tyler]

It wasn't very good actually. Really disappointing.

A review really shouldn't take 16 minutes because it'll get boring really quickly. (And it did.) TK sounded like he didn't know what he was talking about sometimes. I understand you wanted to talk about everything however a quick mention is always good.

 

[Tennis=Life]

It wasn't very good actually. Really disappointing.

A review really shouldn't take 16 minutes because it'll get boring really quickly. (And it did.) TK sounded like he didn't know what he was talking about sometimes. I understand you wanted to talk about everything however a quick mention is always good.

I kind of agree actually, you don't really have to explain in depth which character you're going to use. It should take no longer than 5 seconds to say, okay I am choosing to use Mario for this demonstration of the Subspace Emissary level. It was way too long.

 

[TwilightKing]

Ahaha, I knew someone would mention when I screwed up the part with picking mario. But yeah, the time factor was our biggest problem, which we'll definitely work on for next time. And you have to know we were using very primitive technology to do this, which makes it hard enough


Overall I found it good for a first attempt, it just needs to be shorter and to the point. Hopefully for next time we'll have better software along with hardware to do this as well.