I'm not letting Bulerias win without a fight

[Fabioisonfire]

Here is my newest article.. ZOMG POKEFAB VS BUL LOLZORS

I don't expect it to win, but I think it's one of my best pieces yet.. Tell me what you think: Why Nintendo is Different [56K] Oh, and I tried to keep it very short and sweet.

 

[Jeremy]

I'm not going to lie. I don't like it that much, but I do like it more than Bulerias's last article.

 

[Fabioisonfire]

Okay, that was confusing, but you said it was better than Bul's! PF +1.

 

[Bulerias]

My article is going to win 100%. My article was vastly misinterpreted by many people at NSider and all of the people at TBT because it was just so damn controversial. However, look at the discussion in my newest article... It's just so sweet! It's going to win just because of the discussion.

 

[Propaganda Man]

Bul I never have had the chance you have read it yet >.<


PM it to me >.<

 

[Bulerias]

Bul I never have had the chance you have read it yet >.<


PM it to me >.<

I did. D:

 

[Fabioisonfire]

My article is going to win 100%. My article was vastly misinterpreted by many people at NSider and all of the people at TBT because it was just so damn controversial. However, look at the discussion in my newest article... It's just so sweet! It's going to win just because of the discussion.

Yeah, but I just posted mine like, an hour ago. >_> Plus, (not saying yours is this), but anyone, ANYONE could make a post saying graphics vs. gameplay and it'd hit 174 pages in no time.

 

[Propaganda Man]

Now I'm not saying I'm agreeing wit Bul's points, but his article is better than yours.

 

[Fabioisonfire]

Now I'm not saying I'm agreeing wit Bul's points, but his article is better than yours.

Boo.. You are probably right though.


Maybe I should have spent more than 30 minutes writing it.

 

[Fanghorn]

Now I'm not saying I'm agreeing wit Bul's points, but his article is better than yours.

Heh, Yeah. Yours is somthing that everyone kind of already knew.

 

[Fabioisonfire]

Now I'm not saying I'm agreeing wit Bul's points, but his article is better than yours.

Heh, Yeah. Yours is somthing that everyone kind of already knew.

Wait, so you are saying no one knew about graphics vs. gameplay?

 

[Fanghorn]

Now I'm not saying I'm agreeing wit Bul's points, but his article is better than yours.

Heh, Yeah. Yours is somthing that everyone kind of already knew.

Wait, so you are saying no one knew about graphics vs. gameplay?

Oops. Didn't mean to say that.

 

[AnimalE10]

My article is going to win 100%. My article was vastly misinterpreted by many people at NSider and all of the people at TBT because it was just so damn controversial. However, look at the discussion in my newest article... It's just so sweet! It's going to win just because of the discussion.

I never read it either so PM it to me ok!


^_^

 

[Bulerias]

Now I'm not saying I'm agreeing wit Bul's points, but his article is better than yours.

Heh, Yeah. Yours is somthing that everyone kind of already knew.

Wait, so you are saying no one knew about graphics vs. gameplay?

I innovative on already re-used and rehashed points, whereas you... just kind of recycled them.

 

[Smart_Tech_Dragon_15]

Now I'm not saying I'm agreeing wit Bul's points, but his article is better than yours.

Heh, Yeah. Yours is somthing that everyone kind of already knew.

Wait, so you are saying no one knew about graphics vs. gameplay?

I innovative on already re-use and rehashed points, whereas you... just kind of recycled them.

Engrish!

 

[Bulerias]

Now I'm not saying I'm agreeing wit Bul's points, but his article is better than yours.

Heh, Yeah. Yours is somthing that everyone kind of already knew.

Wait, so you are saying no one knew about graphics vs. gameplay?

I innovative on already re-use and rehashed points, whereas you... just kind of recycled them.

Engrish!

Oh, crap. I make ONE grammar mistake in approximately a year, and people jump on me for it.

Yay.

 

[Jeremy]

My article is going to win 100%. My article was vastly misinterpreted by many people at NSider and all of the people at TBT because it was just so damn controversial. However, look at the discussion in my newest article... It's just so sweet! It's going to win just because of the discussion.

I understood it completely.

 

[Bulerias]

My article is going to win 100%. My article was vastly misinterpreted by many people at NSider and all of the people at TBT because it was just so damn controversial. However, look at the discussion in my newest article... It's just so sweet! It's going to win just because of the discussion.

I understood it completely.

I don't think so... If you did, you wouldn't focus on a couple of sentences where I said that photorealism could be a path to attracting non-gamers. If you understood it 100%, you'd instead focus on my closing remarks and the "Gaming Is Beautiful" series.

 

[Fabioisonfire]

Now I'm not saying I'm agreeing wit Bul's points, but his article is better than yours.

Heh, Yeah. Yours is somthing that everyone kind of already knew.

Wait, so you are saying no one knew about graphics vs. gameplay?

I innovative on already re-used and rehashed points, whereas you... just kind of recycled them.

Boo... Ever since DS and Wii all anyone cares about is innovating everything.. Even bananas.