My First Sig

[JamesBertie]

i dont mind constructive critizism

 

[Josh]

Well, I'll tell you what i think.

It has decent flow (i guese), but you kinda cut them out abit. Theres not really any effects, depth or lighting. The Text is alright i guese, but it is a nice basic sig and as this is your first 5/10.

You might not know what flow, depth or lighting is.

 

[JamesBertie]

Well, I'll tell you what i think.

It has decent flow (i guese), but you kinda cut them out abit. Theres not really any effects, depth or lighting. The Text is alright i guese, but it is a nice basic sig and as this is your first 5/10.

You might not know what flow, depth or lighting is.

thanks, i know im bad at them but im going to look at some tutorials to help

 

[Josh]

Well, I'll tell you what i think.

It has decent flow (i guese), but you kinda cut them out abit. Theres not really any effects, depth or lighting. The Text is alright i guese, but it is a nice basic sig and as this is your first 5/10.

You might not know what flow, depth or lighting is.

thanks, i know im bad at them but im going to look at some tutorials to help

kk, just tell me what program you use and i can help you with some good ones.

 

[JamesBertie]

Well, I'll tell you what i think.

It has decent flow (i guese), but you kinda cut them out abit. Theres not really any effects, depth or lighting. The Text is alright i guese, but it is a nice basic sig and as this is your first 5/10.

You might not know what flow, depth or lighting is.

thanks, i know im bad at them but im going to look at some tutorials to help

kk, just tell me what program you use and i can help you with some good ones.

paint.NET

 

[Roachey#2]

Well, I'll tell you what i think.

It has decent flow (i guese), but you kinda cut them out abit. Theres not really any effects, depth or lighting. The Text is alright i guese, but it is a nice basic sig and as this is your first 5/10.

You might not know what flow, depth or lighting is.

thanks, i know im bad at them but im going to look at some tutorials to help

kk, just tell me what program you use and i can help you with some good ones.

paint.NET

use gimp its better

 

[Bacon Boy]

Renders don't look too good. Background's pretty good. Font doesn't mix.

 

[bittermeat]

When I first looked at it, it gave me nasty thoughts.

o_x

 

[Chibi]

Is mario.... "RIDING" yoshi?

It looks good for a first sig. The renders are a little choppy though. Try working on them. Also, try adding boarders. It's always a nice touch.

 

[NikoKing]

The flow's meh, and get GIMP or Photoshop, Paint.net is for losers IMO. The font type is horrible, and it's low quality. It also just feels like a motion blur of the render, then you put the render back on.

 

[Gnome]

The flow's meh, and get GIMP or Photoshop, Paint.net is for losers IMO. The font type is horrible, and it's low quality. It also just feels like a motion blur of the render, then you put the render back on.

You're calling OCM a loser then. :0

 

[NikoKing]

The flow's meh, and get GIMP or Photoshop, Paint.net is for losers IMO. The font type is horrible, and it's low quality. It also just feels like a motion blur of the render, then you put the render back on.

You're calling OCM a loser then. :0

He uses Paint.net? I thought he used Photoshop, well Paint.net sucks signature wise.

 

[Gnome]

The flow's meh, and get GIMP or Photoshop, Paint.net is for losers IMO. The font type is horrible, and it's low quality. It also just feels like a motion blur of the render, then you put the render back on.

You're calling OCM a loser then. :0

He uses Paint.net? I thought he used Photoshop, well Paint.net sucks signature wise.

Nah he uses P.N

 

[SamXX]

So it looks wrong because of the area that can be seen.
Render's bad, background looks too smudgey.

 

[Zex]

Sorry dood!

Dont like!