• Guest, you're invited to help build our new TBT time capsule! It contains three parts, with some of its elements planned to open in 2029 and others not until the distant future of 2034. Get started in 2024 Community Time Capsule: Blueprints.

New Signature

Jman

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2006
Posts
604
Bells
478
Carnival Coins
0
It's not my best, but it will work for now.


:)
Newjmansig.png


I ripped the grass from a picture I found on Google. :lol:
 
It's pretty cool :gyroidgrin:

Maybe use a different color for the text though
 
It is a bit plain... let me look for improvements to be made.

The text, as Storm said, could change. The color ain't that bad, but it needs antialiasing. The bullet bill render has that ugly white outline to it, and looks like a .jpg image. Now that I think of it, an old 8-bit bullet bill might match the theme more. In all, I give it a 6/10.
thermometerqk0.png
 
It's okay, it could be better.

The text is the main part that needs work...different color would be better, I think.
The bullet could be smaller, so it actually fits in the sig better. Like Shadow said, the white outline doesn't help much either.

5.5/10.
 
Gengar said:
It's okay, it could be better.

The text is the main part that needs work...different color would be better, I think.
The bullet could be smaller, so it actually fits in the sig better. Like Shadow said, the white outline doesn't help much either.

6.5/10.
why do you give 6.5 so much? >_>
 
ZELDAFREAK104 said:
Gengar said:
It's okay, it could be better.

The text is the main part that needs work...different color would be better, I think.
The bullet could be smaller, so it actually fits in the sig better. Like Shadow said, the white outline doesn't help much either.

6.5/10.
why do you give 6.5 so much? >_>
"so much"? Twice is "so much" now, eh? >_>


I guess your sorta right...if I gave your sig a 6.5, this sig should get more of a 6.0-5.5 ish rating...
 
Gengar said:
ZELDAFREAK104 said:
Gengar said:
It's okay, it could be better.

The text is the main part that needs work...different color would be better, I think.
The bullet could be smaller, so it actually fits in the sig better. Like Shadow said, the white outline doesn't help much either.

6.5/10.
why do you give 6.5 so much? >_>
"so much"? Twice is "so much" now, eh? >_>


I guess your sorta right...if I gave your sig a 6.5, this sig should get more of a 6.0-5.5 ish rating...
It was twice in a row, and I thought you did it a 3rd time...

wait, nevermind that was a 7.5
 
ZELDAFREAK104 said:
Gengar said:
ZELDAFREAK104 said:
Gengar said:
It's okay, it could be better.

The text is the main part that needs work...different color would be better, I think.
The bullet could be smaller, so it actually fits in the sig better. Like Shadow said, the white outline doesn't help much either.

6.5/10.
why do you give 6.5 so much? >_>
"so much"? Twice is "so much" now, eh? >_>


I guess your sorta right...if I gave your sig a 6.5, this sig should get more of a 6.0-5.5 ish rating...
It was twice in a row, and I thought you did it a 3rd time...

wait, nevermind that was a 7.5



:p

I see what you mean though, ZF. I changed around what I said.


^_^
 
Back
Top