Patriot Act Weakened :)

Flummoxer

Retired Staff
Joined
Dec 2, 2004
Posts
526
Bells
950
Well, this is kinda long, but it's good to see the Executive branch lose some power.

Associated Press said:
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate voted overwhelmingly Tuesday to end the Bush administration's ability to unilaterally fill U.S. attorney vacancies as a backlash to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' firing of eight federal prosecutors.

Gonzales got a morale boost with an early-morning call from President Bush, their first conversation since a week ago, when the president said he was unhappy with how the Justice Department handled the firings.

Also, the Senate by a 94-2 vote passed a bill that would cancel the attorney general's power to appoint U.S. attorneys without Senate confirmation. Democrats say the Bush administration abused that authority when it fired the eight prosecutors and proposed replacing some with White House loyalists.

``If you politicize the prosecutors, you politicize everybody in the whole chain of law enforcement,'' said Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.

The bill, which has yet to be considered in the House, would set a 120-day deadline for the administration to appoint an interim prosecutor. If the interim appointment is not confirmed by the Senate in that time, a permanent replacement would be named by a federal district judge.

Essentially, the Senate returned the law regarding the appointments of U.S. attorneys to where it was before Congress passed the Patriot Act, including the unilateral appointment authority the administration had sought in the wake of the 9/11 terror attacks.

The vote came as Gonzales and the White House braced for more fallout from the firings. The White House also denied reports that it was looking for possible successors for Gonzales. ``Those rumors are untrue,'' White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino said.

Bush called Gonzales from the Oval Office at 7:15 a.m. EDT and they spoke for several minutes about the political uproar over the firings of eight U.S. attorneys, an issue that has thrust the attorney general into controversy and raised questions about whether he can survive. The White House disclosed Bush's call to bolster Gonzales and attempt to rally Republicans to support him.

Meeting later with reporters, White House press secretary Tony Snow characterized Bush's call to the attorney general as ``a very strong vote of confidence.''

Snow said Bush believes the firings were justified.

``Let me put it this way: Nobody was removed for reasons of partisan recrimination; nor was anybody removed for the purposes of trying to influence the course of ongoing investigations,'' Snow said.

He called reports that Bush was seeking a replacement for Gonzales ``just flat false, period.''

But the day grew more difficult for Gonzales as another Republican, Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado, called for his resignation.

``Alberto Gonzales has repeatedly shown that he is unwilling to enforce the law and unable to effectively manage the Department,'' said Tancredo, a longshot presidential candidate. ``While I do not believe the dismissal of these eight political appointees warrants Mr. Gonzales removal, his total mishandling of the affair is simply the latest in a series of leadership failures at the Justice Department.''

Former House Republican Leader Tom DeLay had said earlier Tuesday that the scandal ``is just a taste of what's going to be like for the next two years.''

``And the Bush administration sort of showed their weakness when they got rid of Don Rumsfeld,'' the Texan said on NBC's ``Today'' show. ``... This is a made up scandal. There is no evidence of wrongdoing whatsoever. ... They ought to be fighting back.''

Bush's call came as congressional investigators sifted through 3,000-pages of e-mails and other material concerning the dismissal of the prosecutors. Some of the documents spelled out fears in the Bush administration that the dismissals of eight U.S. attorneys might not stand up to scrutiny.

The documents were not the end of the inquiry. House and Senate panels later in the week expected to approve subpoenas to White House aides Karl Rove, former counsel Harriet Miers and others. Miers' successor, Fred Fielding, was to tell the Judiciary Committees later Tuesday whether and under what conditions Bush would allow the officials to testify.

But the documents told more of the story of the run-up to the firings and the administration's attempt to choreograph them to reduce the bloodletting. It didn't work out that way - the prosecutors were shocked and angered by the dismissals, the lack of explanation from the Justice Department and news reports that the administration fired the eight for performance reasons.

The documents that Congress will focus on in the coming days show that Gonzales was unhappy with how Deputy Attorney General Paul McNulty explained the firings to the Senate Judiciary Committee in early February.

``The Attorney General is extremely upset with the stories on the US Attys this morning,'' Justice spokesman Brian Roehrkasse, who was traveling with Gonzales in South America at the time, wrote in a Feb. 7 e-mail. ``He also thought some of the DAG's statements were inaccurate.''

In a statement Monday night, Roehrkasse said he was referring to Gonzales' concerns over the firing of Bud Cummins in Little Rock, who he believed was dismissed because of performance issues. At the hearing, McNulty indicated Cummins was being replaced by a political ally.

Neither of the two most senior Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee are stepping forward to endorse Gonzales, but likewise are not calling for his ouster. Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania said he will reserve judgment until he gets all the facts. Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah has not given interviews on the subject, his spokesman said.

Speculation has abounded over who might succeed Gonzales if he doesn't survive the current political tumult. Possible candidates include White House homeland security adviser Frances Fragos Townsend, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, former Solicitor General Ted Olson, Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Wainstein, federal appeals judge Laurence Silberman and PepsiCo attorney Larry Thompson, who was the government's highest ranking black law enforcement official when he was deputy attorney general during Bush's first term.



^_^
 
WAHOO! Finally! I hated that Act since the day it was approved.

Now as long as Gore becomes President, we're good.


^_^
 
Zelandonia said:
A. Political stuff here is kinda frowned apon but,

WAHOO! Finally! I hated that Act since the day it was approved.

Now as long as Gore becomes President, we're good.


^_^
Um.He isnt new.He is a retired staf.
 
Oh good, no more catching terrorists. I'd hate for that to happen.

I'm just glad bush got two terms... Gore would have choked on his own saliva in office during 9/11, and Kerry had his head stuck so far up his own butt it was beyond repair. The guy probably shot himself in Vietnam to get metals, what a wuss.

I think i'll move out of country as soon as possible... this one's gene pool is wrecked.
 
ƒish said:
Oh good, no more catching terrorists. I'd hate for that to happen.

I'm just glad bush got two terms... Gore would have choked on his own saliva in office during 9/11, and Kerry had his head stuck so far up his own butt it was beyond repair. The guy probably shot himself in Vietnam to get metals, what a wuss.

I think i'll move out of country as soon as possible... this one's gene pool is wrecked.
Haha, I'm really hoping that that was sarcasm.

But, I will not start arguing.
 
A. Political stuff here is kinda frowned apon but

Oh sorry, I don't really know the recent (like within a year) rules too well.


:unsure:

And no matter what party you side with, this is good news. The Patriot Act gives the executive branch too much power over the legislative and judicial branches. It's an insult to the system of checks and balances that the founding fathers thought up.

This wasn't meant to become a Republican vs Democrats thread, and I don't really know what Gore and Kerry have to do with it.


;)
 
Flummoxer said:
A. Political stuff here is kinda frowned apon but

Oh sorry, I don't really know the recent (like within a year) rules too well.


:unsure:

And no matter what party you side with, this is good news. The Patriot Act gives the executive branch too much power over the legislative and judicial branches. It's an insult to the system of checks and balances that the founding fathers thought up.

This wasn't meant to become a Republican vs Democrats thread, and I don't really know what Gore and Kerry have to do with it.


;)
Yeah, I am also sorry I posted that. I forgot that you were ex-staff.


:p
 
Back
Top