RobotCrazyMe

[Tyler]

v1

v2

C@C

 

[Propaganda Man]

The background kills it.

 

[Tyler]

Anyway I could improve it?

 

[flabbergasted]

i'd lighten up the backround a little bit.

 

[YogurtBandit]

Unreadbable Text= Bad

 

[UltraByte]

Unreadbable Text= Bad

<_<

Tech sigs are supposed to be like that.

 

[.bored]

I really like it.

 

[Gabby]

I like it too

 

[Nate]

The scanlines go over DK, which is baaaad. D: Kinda bland too.

 

[Grawr]

Unreadbable Text= Bad

You've uhhh, you've become quite the critic recently :/ ..

Anyway, the sig is alright. I suggest maybe using a lighter type of brown for the backround, it looks a bit too dark compared to DK (then again, it could be my computers' brightness or something..)

 

[UltraByte]

Either lighten the bg up (like what 12341234127304891720984 other people said), or maybe.... brush up a bg? *is shot*

 

[Basher]

looks good, the only bad thing with it is the text, thats all but good job
7/10

 

[Tyler]

Unreadbable Text= Bad

You've uhhh, you've become quite the critic recently :/ ..

Nothing wrong with being a critic... D=

 

[YogurtBandit]

Unreadbable Text= Bad

You've uhhh, you've become quite the critic recently :/ ..

Nothing wrong with being a critic... D=

I would say Cut some stuff out of the text and then Make the text larger, if possible.

 

[Propaganda Man]

Unreadbable Text= Bad

<_<

Tech sigs are supposed to be like that.

The sig is called robotcrazyme. You are supposed to read that part

 

[Propaganda Man]

Either lighten the bg up (like what 12341234127304891720984 other people said), or maybe.... brush up a bg? *is shot*

Do both.

 

[Tyler]

Okay I think I have enough info for Version 2.




v2

 

[Grawr]

Okay I think I have enough info for Version 2.




v2

Muuuch better!

8.5/10

 

[Propaganda Man]

Its good. 7/10. But it would be foolish to think that its one of the best.

 

[UltraByte]

Okay I think I have enough info for Version 2.




v2

Way better. 8/10