Sig

[Sarah]

Rate please.

Made this following a tutorial. In GIMP.

I like it cause it's nice and simple.

 

[Elliot]

Kinda good I give it a 8.5.

 

[NikoKing]

7.5/10. It's pretty good, but it doesn't feel like an abstract signature. Most abstract sigs are colorful and have flow, this one is somewhat a complete opposite.

 

[John102]

7.5/10. It's pretty good, but it doesn't feel like an abstract signature. Most abstract sigs are colorful and have flow, this one is somewhat a complete opposite.

I was about to say the same thing myself.

 

[Sarah]

Okay. I should stop following tutorials so much I guess thenn... xD

 

[John102]

Okay. I should stop following tutorials so much I guess thenn... xD

Well abstract art in general has a lot of color that burst out at you....

 

[Sarah]

Okay. I should stop following tutorials so much I guess thenn... xD

Well abstract art in general has a lot of color that burst out at you....

Yea.. I know.
I followed this tut... But I don't know if i was just the one who messed up on it.. xD
http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/line-abstract-tut-t11250.html

 

[NikoKing]

Okay. I should stop following tutorials so much I guess thenn... xD

Well abstract art in general has a lot of color that burst out at you....

Yea.. I know.
I followed this tut... But I don't know if i was just the one who messed up on it.. xD
http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/line-abstract-tut-t11250.html

Nah, it was the user's fault for calling it an abstract sig when it isn't.

 

[Sarah]

Okay. I should stop following tutorials so much I guess thenn... xD

Well abstract art in general has a lot of color that burst out at you....

Yea.. I know.
I followed this tut... But I don't know if i was just the one who messed up on it.. xD
http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/line-abstract-tut-t11250.html

Nah, it was the user's fault for calling it an abstract sig when it isn't.

Kay. What should I change the title to? xP

 

[NikoKing]

Okay. I should stop following tutorials so much I guess thenn... xD

Well abstract art in general has a lot of color that burst out at you....

Yea.. I know.
I followed this tut... But I don't know if i was just the one who messed up on it.. xD
http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/line-abstract-tut-t11250.html

Nah, it was the user's fault for calling it an abstract sig when it isn't.

Kay. What should I change the title to? xP

Hm... Maybe a flow sig? I dunno, but it's flow is it's main focus point so I think that matches it better.

 

[Sarah]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Yea.. I know.
I followed this tut... But I don't know if i was just the one who messed up on it.. xD
http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/line-abstract-tut-t11250.html

Nah, it was the user's fault for calling it an abstract sig when it isn't.

Kay. What should I change the title to? xP

Hm... Maybe a flow sig? I dunno, but it's flow is it's main focus point so I think that matches it better.

Lol. Just changed it to 'Sig' .xP

 

[Ivysaur]

Its pretty cool.

 

[Numner]

I like it o-o
I might make me one :3

 

[bittermeat]

I'd change the gradient to make the white/transparent shapes more noticeable. I like the square near the text, but the font of the text is blahh.

It's cool for a simple sig. 6/10

 

[Sinep1]

Cool 8/10