I remove this comment from @-Blue- thread because @-Blue- did do me a disrespect by making a like on a bully post by @Tude saying this I am troll and ridicule for words I say when you are awareness of English struggle. Why can you expect me support a thing I thought would be a great include in group community project after they do join bully? No such. Not unless apology. You like apologies from other but not forthcoming yourselves when you cause a person that is not your group distress.Firstly @GooseyGuos , welcome to TBT. Everything I’m going to say is my own opinion, unless otherwise stated.
Other members have really summed up well why hosting any type of event official or unofficial is not a good idea at this time. Even the site owner has already stated there will be no events for the foreseeable future so staff can work on trying to sort out issues that many members have risen to staff dating back years.
You’ve already stated: I am new this much is to be the true and it is most difficult to understand this thread. I come to practice English and I made a let down of myself to use translation app for reading some of long posts and I still cannot all follow things and events and what every problem is.
Even if you can’t follow things or every problem, you cannot tell members to stop ‘moping’ and ‘to move on’. This isn’t a petty disagreement which has taken place to make members leave. There are serious issues here which have led a lot of the userbase to leave altogether or take indefinite hiatuses. Some of the members who are on hiatus are unsure if they will ever return.
Personally, I haven’t seen any evidence of bullying or rudeness towards you. You have also told members they are bullying you because they have liked someone else’s post! To me that is ridiculous! Please remember this is a public forum and you or I cannot expect everyone to agree with everything you write. I haven’t even seen anyone criticizing you, only trying to justify their opinions on why an event isn’t a good idea at present. To be honest, I wouldn’t feel comfortable taking part in an event if you dismiss members concerns. How would you react if someone questioned your event? This is nothing exclusively to do with you, there are a few other long term I wouldn’t want to take part in due to the same reasons.
As far as I have seen everyone has treated you with respect, however, you proceed to edit a positive post you made in -Blue- ‘s Let go to the Movies reboot, into a disagreeing post, because they didn’t feel an event was appropriate at this time!
When you suggested an event for the community, at the time of writing this, only 2 members have liked you post. That speaks volumes to me. If I had suggested hosting an event at this time and English is my native language and I have been an active member for over 3 years, I can guarantee members would have replied to me with the exact same comments. I really don’t feel this has anything against you personally, it’s just bad timing with the site in its current poor state.
If you feel that you have bullied here, I suggest you report posts by clicking the report button on the left hand side of the posts or use the Contact the Staff link and share your concerns privately. You can liaise with staff, and they can decide if any members or I have been unfair towards you or if you are being unfair to your fellow members.
Contact the Staff
This is only a suggestion from me, you could contact the staff and ask them about just you hosting an event. However, I think they will agree with most members who feel it would be highly inappropriate to make out everything is all happy and jolly here presently and to repeat myself and others, the site owner has even stated no more events for the foreseeable future, which I think it very fair. If staff agree to your idea, you could try hosting a single event yourself and then maybe others would follow your example and join in.
A few things you would need to think about when hosting an event:
1 – It ties in with forum rules, and the host has to make their own rules for the event.
2 – What do members have to do to participate? Physical or digital drawing, crafting, cooking, photography, Animal Crossing related, different theme, etc.
3 – It would have to be something very different to other events to even try and get what’s left of the members interested.
4 – You would have to keep up-to-date with members questions regarding the event.
5 – How long would it be opened for? How many entries can a member enter?
Those are just a few things you would have to consider, I’m missing many other points.
To conclude, I don’t feel as if anyone is ‘moping’ here or ‘dog piling’ on you. Blue has been very respectful from the start and even admired your enthusiasm, as have others and I. It’s great that you want to be involved in community events here, but this is not the correct time. Official forum events will return, we all just need to be patient and hopefully, word will spread and long term members who have left will return and the forum can be buzzing with activity once again.
Thanks for reading.
No one is saying you can’t have fun. I am curious as to know what you think people are demanding? I think if you understand some the problems maybe you would understand and maybe care why people are upset. People are not demanding we be given anything. They are asking for rule clarification and changes to the site and event rules. There have been many misunderstandings and problems causing people to get upset and take a break. People would like to know why a person got banned and understand the rules. We had a problem with an event at the beginning of the year that left people confused and upset. Events should be fun. I don’t think it’s a lot to ask for a break in events so that rules can be changed and clarified. The staff also needs a bit of a break with all the events that happened last year. I know some are very busy outside of here so people just need a break.you want to mope and say all is bad and staff not giving what we want and must meet our demands or nobody be allowed fun.
Are you seriously dismissing her entire post because she liked a post that you think is bullying you and you still believe there’s some kind of hate bandwagon against you (when it’s already been established that you can like a post because you agree with part of it and not all of it)? There’s things I want to say about the rest of your post but that alone reassures me it’s not worth my time to argue with you anymore.You did do this like the post also I can see, so why can you expectation I be of trust you?
This is an out of control thing to say.By the way, it comes off kind of condescending calling people friends when you've never interacted with them before. Almost makes me wonder if you're a troll account.
Girl it's not that seriousOkay, hold up, wait a second, something ain't right. This is what I mean when I say we have a community problem. Y'all are bored as there has been no update from staff to continue the drama and thus are finding any reason to get a pot stirred, with the latest focus being GooseyGuos
Obviously, Goosey is new and has no idea the context for the time and energy that forum events require. But instead of ignoring it and moving on, y'all are engaging. And yes, you all are band-wagoning against this person.
Sometimes you have to let a person not understand until they understand themselves.
And out of all the things you argue about, you're arguing about why an event cannot happen, when it's already been announced that it can't happen? Be for real right now. There's actually no reason this had to be a drawn out argument.
This is out an out of control thing to say.
This is what I mean when I say we are not welcoming to new people. This is what I mean when I say that the forum's priorities for what we allow conversationally are skewed in a weird direction.
The last page and a half are not feedback driven posts. They are doing nothing to improve the website and true feedback isn't being given, it's just been people dog-piling on a new member who is an English-learner on a predominantly English speaking forum. What exactly is being done here that is productive?
bless you for trying, hat, but you're wasting your time with them because they actually are a troll, as seen in this very thread a dozen pages or so back, and also like to stir drama on and off site. it's not worth interacting with them, because they detract from the same "productive" discussion they claim everyone else is. they're part of the very community problem they're describing, ironically.Girl it's not that serious
How are members not welcoming when they've written entire paragraphs trying to explain how they're in no way trying to be mean and just want to tell them how the forum and events work and how much time and ressources they take, considering it takes real people and real artists to think about and create events. Just because members are trying their best to explain how running this site especially during events is close to a full time job doesn't mean they're dog-piling on him. And language has nothing to do with this. You can be condescending and you can undermine other people's work in every language.
It took me a while to read through most of this thread but what you call "drama" isn't necessarily actual drama, maybe there are actual issues that need to be adressed behind all of this, and maybe the commotion is justified. Calling people bored as if they spent their entire day refreshing this topic for a drop of "drama" seems weird to me tbh!
You did do this like the post also I can see, so why can you expectation I be of trust you?
It is the right thing to do to make it 4 hours because too many make an enjoyment of Dog Piling this and is already too hard to read everything and then everyone says long posts to me at same time.
No-one ever wrote they didn’t want/like your idea, only just not at this present time. To repeat myself, I tried to encourage you, please ask the staff and see what they say and that could be the decider whether you host a solo event.I had idea, you want no idea, you want to mope and say all is bad and staff not giving what we want and must meet our demands or nobody be allowed fun. You want make a shoot of everyone who want to make it better. Good luck my friends.
Gabby, I've just re-read the opening post by Jeremy and this is quoted from the opening post:The last page and a half are not feedback driven posts. They are doing nothing to improve the website and true feedback isn't being given, it's just been people dog-piling on a new member who is an English-learner on a predominantly English speaking forum. What exactly is being done here that is productive?
Everything we post here doesn't necessarily have to be feedback, we can offer opinions posted by other users.Feel free to discuss and share your own opinions about suggestions left by other users.
Okay, hold up, wait a second, something ain't right. This is what I mean when I say we have a community problem. Y'all are bored as there has been no update from staff to continue the drama and thus are finding any reason to get a pot stirred, with the latest focus being GooseyGuos
Obviously, Goosey is new and has no idea the context for the time and energy that forum events require. But instead of ignoring it and moving on, y'all are engaging. And yes, you all are band-wagoning against this person.
Sometimes you have to let a person not understand until they understand themselves.
And out of all the things you argue about, you're arguing about why an event cannot happen, when it's already been announced that it can't happen? Be for real right now. There's actually no reason this had to be a drawn out argument.
This is an out of control thing to say.
This is what I mean when I say we are not welcoming to new people. This is what I mean when I say that the forum's priorities for what we allow conversationally are skewed in a weird direction.
The last page and a half are not feedback driven posts. They are doing nothing to improve the website and true feedback isn't being given, it's just been people dog-piling on a new member who is an English-learner on a predominantly English speaking forum. What exactly is being done here that is productive?
@Tude Step into Goosey’s shoes for a second. You are a non-English speaker on an English speaking forum, and you have 3-4 people who are more proficient at a language than you attempting to argue and debate about something you have little knowledge about. This puts Goosey at a clear disadvantage. I’m not saying people are being negative about his ability, I’m saying that people are being willfully ignorant of the position we are putting this member in. It’s vulnerable to learn a new language and even more vulnerable to try to join a community where you don’t speak the predominant language and then have a bunch of people be rude to you in that language, which is what is happening in this thread.
Uh, interesting post. There’s a lot I disagree with in here, but based on the first paragraph, it seems like you hold the assumption that people in this thread eagerly anticipate staff updates just so they can rip them to shreds. I highly doubt this is true. When a staff member posts something and it’s immediately torn apart by multiple people, it’s because they’re deservedly frustrated that we had to wait weeks for a nothing answer, not because they’re chronically online and don’t have anything better to do with their lives. Most of the people who did this in the first place are gone because having hope in a site like this is futile and tiring, and I’m sure they’d still be here if they enjoyed any of this. If I’m wrong about that and this isn’t what you were trying to insinuate, you can let me know.Okay, hold up, wait a second, something ain't right. This is what I mean when I say we have a community problem. Y'all are bored as there has been no update from staff to continue the drama and thus are finding any reason to get a pot stirred, with the latest focus being GooseyGuos
Obviously, Goosey is new and has no idea the context for the time and energy that forum events require. But instead of ignoring it and moving on, y'all are engaging. And yes, you all are band-wagoning against this person.
Sometimes you have to let a person not understand until they understand themselves.
And out of all the things you argue about, you're arguing about why an event cannot happen, when it's already been announced that it can't happen? Be for real right now. There's actually no reason this had to be a drawn out argument.
This is an out of control thing to say.
This is what I mean when I say we are not welcoming to new people. This is what I mean when I say that the forum's priorities for what we allow conversationally are skewed in a weird direction.
The last page and a half are not feedback driven posts. They are doing nothing to improve the website and true feedback isn't being given, it's just been people dog-piling on a new member who is an English-learner on a predominantly English speaking forum. What exactly is being done here that is productive?
@Tude Step into Goosey’s shoes for a second. You are a non-English speaker on an English speaking forum, and you have 3-4 people who are more proficient at a language than you attempting to argue and debate about something you have little knowledge about. This puts Goosey at a clear disadvantage. I’m not saying people are being negative about his ability, I’m saying that people are being willfully ignorant of the position we are putting this member in. It’s vulnerable to learn a new language and even more vulnerable to try to join a community where you don’t speak the predominant language and then have a bunch of people be rude to you in that language, which is what is happening in this thread.
Okay sir. I’m sorry, that’s my fault for not having enough restraint to ignore your posts (I’m not trying to be sarcastic by the way, that was a serious apology). That last post was genuinely going to be my final response, but I guess this one will be it now. I have no idea what you mean when you said I enjoy causing trouble. I’m not that pathetic. I only respond because you keep insisting that there’s some kind of hate bandwagon against you when that simply does not exist. This argument shouldn’t have started in the first place and I really don’t get why you had to insist that events don’t require a lot of work when that’s incorrect.Thank you my friend, I say this before and say this now. You are wonderful person. It is of great disappointment to find this bigotry for way I speak when English is still learning.
No matter what it takes to try to cover it up it is bully to call person names, to be critic of language they still learn and to write to me many times a long post that I say time again I cannot understand it and takes me most time to translate if not use app and with use app is not perfect for this anyway.
Making to this behaviour to new member because they want to make encouragement that everything can be alright is bad behaviour and this be why there not be a community and new people will not wish to stay. Excuses to say not bullying are not truthful.
@Yoshi155 you keep say this you not go to talk anymore then keep say more to me anyway. Please do not and leave me alone now. It seem you enjoy too much making trouble.
That is same for all of you joining in Dog Piling. Please do not and leave me alone I will not waste time try to translate long posts of User. I do not need this reading many posts of organised Dog Pile of people justify way you treat new people not of your language and saying it not be bullying to call person troll, ridicule way of speak when language still learn and rude about my English be broken and being angry for my not understanding or speak like American.
You only destroy your own community doing this. You can do liking on bully post but that can be big red sign of community that only thriving on bullying.
Again I say thank you to @Gabby but it is with disgust I see people call Gabby troll too.
This really isn't productive and calling people trolls doesn't help anything.bless you for trying, hat, but you're wasting your time with them because they actually are a troll, as seen in this very thread a dozen pages or so back, and also like to stir drama on and off site. it's not worth interacting with them, because they detract from the same "productive" discussion they claim everyone else is. they're part of the very community problem they're describing, ironically.
Gabby isn't wrong here. This is the feedback thread, not "let's all respond to this one user who isn't taking no for an answer about events instead of moving on".The last page and a half are not feedback driven posts. They are doing nothing to improve the website and true feedback isn't being given, it's just been people dog-piling on a new member who is an English-learner on a predominantly English speaking forum. What exactly is being done here that is productive?
There's not exactly an on/off switch when it comes to moderating, so history is something that would always be considered, especially when an official warning is sent. For example, if a member receives a warning for spamming after they were warned for the same thing a few days earlier, it would start to paint a picture that they may be struggling to follow the staff's direction about it. Sometimes, this is occurring over a much longer period. If the same problem occurred once or twice a year ago, it may not factor into the actions we take. However, if it occurred dozens of times over a long period, it may be recognized as a pattern like in the first example.At what point is an investigation appropriate into a member’s posting history?
No, so there will be something that causes us to do so if we're not already familiar with their history. For example, something that warrants a warning, as I mentioned above. The warning history alone is typically (ideally) enough to show a history without digging through tons of other posts.Do you have the time to look at every member’s posting history?
I probably covered this one above, but we're looking at the warning history of a member when something about their behavior comes up. To get an even bigger picture, we may skim through their post history if they already have an extensive warning history and we're considering further action.When and why does this act become a priority?
It does apply to everyone, but I should reiterate that having a few warnings from a while ago won't typically be taken into consideration. Even if you have dozens of previous warnings, if they're very old, with a long period of active and unproblematic history since, they won't necessarily be taken into consideration as much as a consistent pattern of behavior. Escalating to a ban happens when we feel nothing is changing after communicating our concerns. So would a sincere apology help? Possibly a bit, if we think the member is serious about correcting the thing they were warned or banned for.If historic posts contribute a ban extension - why is this not applied to everyone - does an apology just make everything okay?
I assume this is about looking through post history as opposed to warning history. This is not something we normally do since the warnings usually cover members' actions, and how we've tried to communicate to them about their actions. If we feel like we need to review unwarned posts, it's probably because we're trying to be thorough before taking further action or because we're worried that posts may have been missed (unseen or unreported). The latter would typically apply to cases where the member is newer, so doesn't have a long history on the site, but has raised red flags with potentially problematic content. These are cases where we'd actually like to increase our review of post history because posts can sometimes go unreported.Is this act of review not just fishing for a reason to extend a ban?
I mentioned this a bit with the first question, but this is typically already going to be outlined by warning history. If we have to look through the actual posts for some reason, I don't imagine that we'd spend a long time closely looking through all of them one by one. Instead, this process is going to start by looking at the list of warnings to see if there's a pattern of unchanging behavior. The big thing here is that if we feel we've been trying to communicate an issue to a member but the issue keeps happening, we are going to start considering the next step. No one's looking through random members' posts to dig up dirt, but even if something was uncovered from a while ago, we're not necessarily going to hold it against you. Except in very extreme/dangerous/obvious cases, our first goal is to communicate and allow chances to work with the moderators to change course in order to fit with the community and its rules.How long back do you go into a user’s history - a year, 5 years, 1 month?
We take every report with a grain of salt in the sense that it's just a way to highlight content. As if we came across the post on our own, we'll look into it ourselves and make our own decision, which is sometimes that no action needs to be taken. Reporting is very useful for us because we can't participate in every discussion, so it simply lets us know that something should be read.If a user makes multiple reports against someone instead of using the ignore feature, doesn’t that create a bias for staff? As they’re now actively listening for things that may not be there?