Correct. But with access to the internet, it's possible to just look up that artwork to view it digitally. I know some people do like to have art on their walls at home though. I have a printed painting that I paid probably less than $20 for. It was a painting in an art museum, and I'm not sure if the artist was popular. But maybe photograph prints are more valuable than art? It would make sense, as you can't exactly conjure a photograph like you can with art.