Blood Eclipse
𖤐 ♱ 𖤐
.
Last edited:
Thank you so much, I will definitely give them a watch!I wasn't a fan of that sad movie either. But a couple of movies i liked ( I'm old, so these are old) are The Birdcage, and To Wong Foo, Thanks For Everything, Julie Newmar. They may not be exactly what you're looking for, but I thought they were fun.
Absolutely this. You'll find a lot of older movies about minority groups (though it still feels a little weird to categorize 2005 as 'older') tend to be seen as important less because of how they portray the characters in question, and moreso because of how they portray the minority characters given the limitations of their respective time periods. Similarly, you'll find what is defined as "good representation" to one generation will inevitably be criticized--no matter how well-intented--by later generations. Simply put, if you're going to watch any older movie--particularly those known for their social impact--you're going to have to look at them with a much more analytical eye and generally be aware of the many asterisks that come along with it.i've never seen this movie and don't intend to, so take this with a grain of salt.
i don't think it's necessarily heralded as good representation but more for what it did for representation. this movie came out only two years after the striking down of the anti-sodomy law which "effectively decriminalized homosexual relations nationwide" or, in layman's terms, made gay relationships legal. it was a huge risk. i believe the script itself was written before that law was even overturned, but nobody wanted to touch it for obvious reasons. it could've locked the two lead actors out of hollywood, and they faced a lot of homophobic hate etc. for going through with it, but they did so anyway because they knew how important it was. the academy acted like it didn't even exist, but it was a historic accomplishment nonetheless. but even aside from that, this was one of the first times a lot of gay people saw themselves on the big screen, in the media. it made them feel seen. it made them feel less alone. it made them feel like people. it meant a lot to them and still does, and i think that's why it still receives the praise it does.
My favorite LGBTQ movie right now (and one of my favorite movies of all time) is Carol. Oh my god its so good, you have to watch it if you haven't already!Recently, I've been on the hunt down for some good LBTQ movies to watch and came across Brokeback Mountain on some top 10 list (I've heard about it before, too, I just never decided to watch it then).
I decided to watch it yesterday and didn't like it at all. I'm now wondering how on earth this movie got so popular as one of the best films to represent the LBTQ.
[Spoiler Alert]
It starts of ok... nothing too special though the pacing is pretty forced and rushed, imo.
Later on, in the story, the main character goes from someone I had sympathy for to someone I thought was terrible. Being married, WITH CHILDREN, I might add, he kept dumping the responsibility of raising his daughters on his working wife to go cheat with his lover. (I would find this act equally abhorrent if he was cheating with a female). He even tries hitting his wife when she figures out that instead of fishing with his "friend", he was actually with his lover. He also got mad when she wanted to use protection to not have any more kids that he wouldn't help to raise. And despite all of that, his wife never reveals any of that to their daughters. If anything, I had the most sympathy for his wife than any other characters in this movie.
How is this a good representation of LGBTQ again? I'm confused.
(BTW if you know of any good LGBTQ movies pls feel free to list them ^^)