Pathetic
Senior Member
## UNVOTE
##VOTE: alise
Tom hasn't wrote anything about her. Maybe tom and alise are scum
did u not just see tom's bully post
## UNVOTE
##VOTE: alise
Tom hasn't wrote anything about her. Maybe tom and alise are scum
Nvm! Saw the post. But I'm sticking with her## UNVOTE
##VOTE: alise
Tom hasn't wrote anything about her. Maybe tom and alise are scum
## UNVOTE
##VOTE: alise
Tom hasn't wrote anything about her. Maybe tom and alise are scum
I assure you, Tsun passively covering me is a frame on me. What kind of scum would (hypothetically) make a scummate appear so obvious, especially when the game was balanced towards Mafia?Because there was essentially nothing worthwhile responding to in your post? You felt that Tsun was simply trying to win you and Leaf over because you two were being the most active contributors, but I really don't feel the same way about that. I do think it was Tsun merely trying to passively cover Leaf while not giving them complete endorsement. Your post was nothing but statements and commentary for the most part, not direct read from it.
Nvm! Saw the post. But I'm sticking with her
Because there's literally nothing to analyse, Elise hasn't contributed anything worthwhile to dissect. Just like you haven't Ryan, nor have you even given reason why you constantly wanted to lynch me.
Yet there was nothing of value to actually criticize Elise or the others on. They're literally nothing contributed by any of them to give me any remote indication of their alignment, so instead we're stuck in this continuous air of uncertainty. I honestly expect us to mislynch and lose because of this. There's no real substance to anyone's posts outside of Blue Leaf.
Because there was essentially nothing worthwhile responding to in your post? You felt that Tsun was simply trying to win you and Leaf over because you two were being the most active contributors, but I really don't feel the same way about that. I do think it was Tsun merely trying to passively cover Leaf while not giving them complete endorsement. Your post was nothing but statements and commentary for the most part, not direct read from it.
Regardless, I'm not convinced Elise because she's a stupidly easy target.I assure you, Tsun passively covering me is a frame on me. What kind of scum would (hypothetically) make a scummate appear so obvious, especially when the game was balanced towards Mafia?
I said I would vote for either Natty or Elise, so here.
##VOTE: Alise
This game got pretty frustrating ever since we mislynched. :/
In fact what do the rest of you think about Niamh?
In fact what do the rest of you think about Niamh?
Quiet, not really contributive. Interesting that a majority of them were all sus but dogpiled on Elise.
Quiet, not really contributive. Interesting that a majority of them were all sus but dogpiled on Elise.
I voted Elise because it's apparent that's who everyone wants to vote for and we're probably going to lose anyways. Therefore, #YOLO.
![]()
I said my thoughts a while ago ; I think she's Town, she was quiet at the beginning of both this game and Mean Girls (she was Townie).In fact what do the rest of you think about Niamh?
Just because BlueLeaf is the only one posting anything of much substance you're going to vote for him? Great job as town, Tom (if you are one).
From what I'm reading you could have talked about why you disagreed with my read on what tsundere could have been doing with their post at the time you made that response to me. I think that it's easy to read the same thing into me when it comes to tsundere's post because I can see parts of what they said about me being a means to cover me up as well. However, what makes my position on this matter different than yours is that I know what I am and they were doing a similar thing to me as they were doing to BlueLeaf.
Tsundere also gave Niamh the 'lives in a different timezone' pass when it came to being suspicious or not in the aforementioned post. What do you think about that being used as a free pass out of being suspicious?
But do you think that her living in a different timezone is a legit excuse not to be more contributive?