Damn hackers...

[Megamannt125]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Can I ask you something Tye? If you had a choice, Super Mario Galaxy or Super Mario World?

Super Mario Galaxy. Is there a problem with that? I prefer 3D games to 2D games. Sprites bore me, especially older ones. I'm not saying that I don't like SMW, because I LOVE it. It's one of the greatest games ever. But I'd prefer Galaxy to it any day, because it's more fun to play.

You need help.

Why? Because he prefers games with better graphics, cool controls, wide variety of enemies, and storyline?

Just because the storyline isn't "Bowser took peach, go to his castle and beat him up" doesn't mean the game is bad.

I'm not the type to care about graphics but gameplay, sure Super Mario Galaxy is fun the first time you play it, but after that it's incredibly boring, Casual games are short and sweet, amazing games like SMW are like the everlasting gobstobbers that still taste good after you've gotten through the first layer and then last for a long time.

 

[Pear]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Can I ask you something Tye? If you had a choice, Super Mario Galaxy or Super Mario World?

Super Mario Galaxy. Is there a problem with that? I prefer 3D games to 2D games. Sprites bore me, especially older ones. I'm not saying that I don't like SMW, because I LOVE it. It's one of the greatest games ever. But I'd prefer Galaxy to it any day, because it's more fun to play.

You need help.

Why? Because he prefers games with better graphics, cool controls, wide variety of enemies, and storyline?

Just because the storyline isn't "Bowser took peach, go to his castle and beat him up" doesn't mean the game is bad.

This. Nintendo ceased to really make games in about 2004.

 

[Tyeforce]

A game company that doesn't develop products for gamers, how is that even remotely correct?

What if Oscar Meyer all of a sudden started producing vegetable snacks? Would that be fair for those that love their Bologna?

They DO develop games for gamers. Along with games that target non-gamers. Why? To get more people to become gamers!! If they weren't still developing for gamers, we wouldn't have games like Other M, Zelda Wii, Spirit Tracks, Galaxy 2, and New Super Mario Bros. Wii in the making.

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Super Mario Galaxy. Is there a problem with that? I prefer 3D games to 2D games. Sprites bore me, especially older ones. I'm not saying that I don't like SMW, because I LOVE it. It's one of the greatest games ever. But I'd prefer Galaxy to it any day, because it's more fun to play.

You need help.

Why? Because he prefers games with better graphics, cool controls, wide variety of enemies, and storyline?

Just because the storyline isn't "Bowser took peach, go to his castle and beat him up" doesn't mean the game is bad.

I'm not the type to care about graphics but gameplay, sure Super Mario Galaxy is fun the first time you play it, but after that it's incredibly boring, Casual games are short and sweet, amazing games like SMW are like the everlasting gobstobbers that still taste good after you've gotten through the first layer and then last for a long time.

I'm all for gameplay, too. Super Mario Galaxy's gameplay is much more fun and entertaining than Super Mario World's. Sorry.

 

[Megamannt125]

A game company that doesn't develop products for gamers, how is that even remotely correct?

What if Oscar Meyer all of a sudden started producing vegetable snacks? Would that be fair for those that love their Bologna?

They DO develop games for gamers. Along with games that target non-gamers. Why? To get more people to become gamers!! If they weren't still developing for gamers, we wouldn't have games like Other M, Zelda Wii, Spirit Tracks, Galaxy 2, and New Super Mario Bros. Wii in the making.

They'll probably screw up Zelda too. They have already started when they made TP and PH incredibly easy.

 

[Tyeforce]

Why? There's nothing wrong with liking newer games better than older ones. YOU people are the fanboys. Old school fanboys. I love older games, but I like newer experiences.

We simply have nostalgic roots planted with the games of yesteryear. Doesn't make us ignorant fans.

So do I, but I just prefer newer games. How does that make me ignorant?

 

[Blue Cup]

A game company that doesn't develop products for gamers, how is that even remotely correct?

What if Oscar Meyer all of a sudden started producing vegetable snacks? Would that be fair for those that love their Bologna?

They DO develop games for gamers. Along with games that target non-gamers. Why? To get more people to become gamers!! If they weren't still developing for gamers, we wouldn't have games like Other M, Zelda Wii, Spirit Tracks, Galaxy 2, and New Super Mario Bros. Wii in the making.

They'll probably screw up Zelda too. They have already started when they made TP and PH incredibly easy.

Sad, but true. Twilight Princess was such a drag.

And dude, just noticed the cute catgirl in your sig.

And now it's gone?!

 

[Tyeforce]

A game company that doesn't develop products for gamers, how is that even remotely correct?

What if Oscar Meyer all of a sudden started producing vegetable snacks? Would that be fair for those that love their Bologna?

They DO develop games for gamers. Along with games that target non-gamers. Why? To get more people to become gamers!! If they weren't still developing for gamers, we wouldn't have games like Other M, Zelda Wii, Spirit Tracks, Galaxy 2, and New Super Mario Bros. Wii in the making.

They'll probably screw up Zelda too. They have already started when they made TP and PH incredibly easy.

Twilight Princess was about the same as Ocarina of Time when it comes to difficulty, so are you saying that OoT is too easy to be a good game?

 

[Blue Cup]

A game company that doesn't develop products for gamers, how is that even remotely correct?

What if Oscar Meyer all of a sudden started producing vegetable snacks? Would that be fair for those that love their Bologna?

They DO develop games for gamers. Along with games that target non-gamers. Why? To get more people to become gamers!! If they weren't still developing for gamers, we wouldn't have games like Other M, Zelda Wii, Spirit Tracks, Galaxy 2, and New Super Mario Bros. Wii in the making.

They'll probably screw up Zelda too. They have already started when they made TP and PH incredibly easy.

Twilight Princess was about the same as Ocarina of Time when it comes to difficulty, so are you saying that OoT is too easy to be a good game?

Lulz

Haven't you given up yet?

 

[Megamannt125]

A game company that doesn't develop products for gamers, how is that even remotely correct?

What if Oscar Meyer all of a sudden started producing vegetable snacks? Would that be fair for those that love their Bologna?

They DO develop games for gamers. Along with games that target non-gamers. Why? To get more people to become gamers!! If they weren't still developing for gamers, we wouldn't have games like Other M, Zelda Wii, Spirit Tracks, Galaxy 2, and New Super Mario Bros. Wii in the making.

They'll probably screw up Zelda too. They have already started when they made TP and PH incredibly easy.

Twilight Princess was about the same as Ocarina of Time when it comes to difficulty, so are you saying that OoT is too easy to be a good game?

You can't possibly compare TP's difficulty to OOT's like that. A 5 year old could solve the puzzles in TP without any effort. The only part I got stuck at is finding the right door to go to in the beginning of the lakebed temple with the stairs, but I figured it out after a few minutes and went through the rest of the temple like a cakewalk. Also, why don't you go out in Hyrule field in TP, stand with a bunch of enemies and see how long it takes to kill you. Now go play Link to the past and stand with a bunch of enemies and see how long it takes to kill you.

 

[Tyeforce]

A game company that doesn't develop products for gamers, how is that even remotely correct?

What if Oscar Meyer all of a sudden started producing vegetable snacks? Would that be fair for those that love their Bologna?

They DO develop games for gamers. Along with games that target non-gamers. Why? To get more people to become gamers!! If they weren't still developing for gamers, we wouldn't have games like Other M, Zelda Wii, Spirit Tracks, Galaxy 2, and New Super Mario Bros. Wii in the making.

They'll probably screw up Zelda too. They have already started when they made TP and PH incredibly easy.

Twilight Princess was about the same as Ocarina of Time when it comes to difficulty, so are you saying that OoT is too easy to be a good game?

Lulz

Haven't you given up yet?

What is there to give up? I just have a bunch of old school gamers flaming me because I have different opinions on gaming. Is my opinion really that important to you? Honestly, you act as if you need to "change" me.

 

[Tyeforce]

A game company that doesn't develop products for gamers, how is that even remotely correct?

What if Oscar Meyer all of a sudden started producing vegetable snacks? Would that be fair for those that love their Bologna?

They DO develop games for gamers. Along with games that target non-gamers. Why? To get more people to become gamers!! If they weren't still developing for gamers, we wouldn't have games like Other M, Zelda Wii, Spirit Tracks, Galaxy 2, and New Super Mario Bros. Wii in the making.

They'll probably screw up Zelda too. They have already started when they made TP and PH incredibly easy.

Twilight Princess was about the same as Ocarina of Time when it comes to difficulty, so are you saying that OoT is too easy to be a good game?

You can't possibly compare TP's difficulty to OOT's like that. A 5 year old could solve the puzzles in TP without any effort. The only part I got stuck at is finding the right door to go to in the beginning of the lakebed temple with the stairs, but I figured it out after a few minutes and went through the rest of the temple like a cakewalk. Also, why don't you go out in Hyrule field in TP, stand with a bunch of enemies and see how long it takes to kill you. Now go play ]You're just being biased. Twilight Princess wasn't as easy as you're making it seem.

 

[Pear]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

They'll probably screw up Zelda too. They have already started when they made TP and PH incredibly easy.

Twilight Princess was about the same as Ocarina of Time when it comes to difficulty, so are you saying that OoT is too easy to be a good game?

Lulz

Haven't you given up yet?

What is there to give up? I just have a bunch of old school gamers flaming me because I have different opinions on gaming. Is my opinion really that important to you? Honestly, you act as if you need to "change" me.

Shun the nonbeliever! Shunnnnnnah!
Jk.

 

[Megamannt125]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

They'll probably screw up Zelda too. They have already started when they made TP and PH incredibly easy.

Twilight Princess was about the same as Ocarina of Time when it comes to difficulty, so are you saying that OoT is too easy to be a good game?

You can't possibly compare TP's difficulty to OOT's like that. A 5 year old could solve the puzzles in TP without any effort. The only part I got stuck at is finding the right door to go to in the beginning of the lakebed temple with the stairs, but I figured it out after a few minutes and went through the rest of the temple like a cakewalk. Also, why don't you go out in Hyrule field in TP, stand with a bunch of enemies and see how long it takes to kill you. Now go play ]You're just being biased. Twilight Princess wasn't as easy as you're making it seem.

I didn't die a single time in TP, or even came close to dying.

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Twilight Princess was about the same as Ocarina of Time when it comes to difficulty, so are you saying that OoT is too easy to be a good game?

You can't possibly compare TP's difficulty to OOT's like that. A 5 year old could solve the puzzles in TP without any effort. The only part I got stuck at is finding the right door to go to in the beginning of the lakebed temple with the stairs, but I figured it out after a few minutes and went through the rest of the temple like a cakewalk. Also, why don't you go out in Hyrule field in TP, stand with a bunch of enemies and see how long it takes to kill you. Now go play ]You're just being biased. Twilight Princess wasn't as easy as you're making it seem.

I didn't die a single time in TP, or even came close to dying.

Nor did I in Ocarina of Time.

 

[Blue Cup]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

They'll probably screw up Zelda too. They have already started when they made TP and PH incredibly easy.

Twilight Princess was about the same as Ocarina of Time when it comes to difficulty, so are you saying that OoT is too easy to be a good game?

Lulz

Haven't you given up yet?

What is there to give up? I just have a bunch of old school gamers flaming me because I have different opinions on gaming. Is my opinion really that important to you? Honestly, you act as if you need to "change" me.

Give up this foolish fanboy cover of yours and take a look at what your precious Nintendo has done to its fan base.

You calling us fanboys is just ignorant. You know nothing of our gaming habits or which company we favor, unlike you where it's blatantly obvious with your sad attempts at defending and trying to justify every single move Nintendo has made with the Wii.

Nor did I in Ocarina of Time.

Whatever helps your argument I suppose. I know another cretin on another forum that does the same thing.

 

[MygL]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Twilight Princess was about the same as Ocarina of Time when it comes to difficulty, so are you saying that OoT is too easy to be a good game?

Lulz

Haven't you given up yet?

What is there to give up? I just have a bunch of old school gamers flaming me because I have different opinions on gaming. Is my opinion really that important to you? Honestly, you act as if you need to "change" me.

Shun the nonbeliever! Shunnnnnnah!
Jk.

Make him play without items, Fox only, FInal Destination, NAO!!!

 

[Tyeforce]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

Twilight Princess was about the same as Ocarina of Time when it comes to difficulty, so are you saying that OoT is too easy to be a good game?

Lulz

Haven't you given up yet?

What is there to give up? I just have a bunch of old school gamers flaming me because I have different opinions on gaming. Is my opinion really that important to you? Honestly, you act as if you need to "change" me.

Give up this foolish fanboy cover of yours and take a look at what your precious Nintendo has done to its fan base.

You calling us fanboys is just ignorant. You know nothing of our gaming habits or which company we favor, unlike you where it's blatantly obvious with your sad attempts at defending and trying to justify every single move Nintendo has made with the Wii.

I lol'd. You're still trying to change me? Nintendo is doing nothing but good. You just want them to go back to their old school roots. This is obviously going nowhere, so let's just get back on topic. Or are you incapable of doing that?

 

[MygL]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

You can't possibly compare TP's difficulty to OOT's like that. A 5 year old could solve the puzzles in TP without any effort. The only part I got stuck at is finding the right door to go to in the beginning of the lakebed temple with the stairs, but I figured it out after a few minutes and went through the rest of the temple like a cakewalk. Also, why don't you go out in Hyrule field in TP, stand with a bunch of enemies and see how long it takes to kill you. Now go play ]You're just being biased. Twilight Princess wasn't as easy as you're making it seem.

I didn't die a single time in TP, or even came close to dying.

Nor did I in Ocarina of Time.

I did!

LOOLOLOLOLOLo
....
..

Oh crap!

 

[Megamannt125]

I remember when I could be proud to own a Nintendo console. Now I can't wait until I get a PS3.