disapointed with wild world

I think the best one(s) were PG and CF. WW wasn't all that good, though it could keep me busy for hours...
 
#gsw1996 said:
Fluke said:
ACWW was a lot different from GCN. but CF isn't much different from both..
its a combo and that makes it AWESOME :3
Not really, i would have loved to see new things instead of the regular:

- Find money rock
- Sell fruit
- Find fossils
- Check Nooks

Byebye.
 
Bazzel said:
#gsw1996 said:
Fluke said:
ACWW was a lot different from GCN. but CF isn't much different from both..
its a combo and that makes it AWESOME :3
Not really, i would have loved to see new things instead of the regular:

- Find money rock
- Sell fruit
- Find fossils
- Check Nooks

Byebye.
Tell it like it is. I agree with you. CF deserves a 7.5, but its still fun. Its obvious that someone threw the ACWW ds cartridge at the Animal Crossing team and said "heres your design document. get to work."
 
Well, the AC team could have really knocked our socks off with AC:CF. But, IMO, nothing really changed except for the framerate and city..
 
QNT3N said:
Well, the AC team could have really knocked our socks off with AC:CF. But, IMO, nothing really changed except for the framerate and city..
That's true, but it's animal crossing, so who cares :D
 
Jas0n said:
QNT3N said:
Well, the AC team could have really knocked our socks off with AC:CF. But, IMO, nothing really changed except for the framerate and city..
That's true, but it's animal crossing, so who cares :D
Yeah, I guess.

Anyway, I don't care about nothing changed. I still worship this game.
 
I actually played WW over CF today. PG was second. Barely played CF today. WW is still good.
 
you're not alone thinking wild world was a disappointment. I thought it was pretty bad because:
A. the holidays were terrible except the acorn festival.
B.the town just wasn't big enough.
C.didn't have that nostalgic feel like the original game, even though it was my first AC game to buy.
 
Back
Top