DSFAN121 said:
Bulerias said:
DSFAN121 said:
>_>
That's not what I meant by over, and I thought that was obvious. But since it apparently isn't, I'll elaborate: Nintendo will not make any more good Zelda games. They'll be more "accessible to casuals", in other words the game will do everything for you. And the same thing goes for all the other franchises. Basically, I meant Nintendo will be over in the same way Sonic is currently over.
What? You're making absolutely no sense.
Sonic is over because his games suck, not because they're accessible to everyone. Zelda, however, has been enjoying high rated games this past decade (unlike Sonic), and guess what... the "accessible to everyone" mentality has been there since they finished Wind Waker, and Twilight Princess + Phantom Hourglass are great games. The latter is good, not great, but TP is a masterpiece.
First off, chill. It's just a video game.
Second,
you are not making sense. The games will suck BECAUSE they're accessible to everyone. Like I said in my last post, the game will basically do everything for you. There will be no new challenge, and therefore they won't be as good. And Twilight Princess, the game that they rushed to make "Wii-compatible", is NOT a masterpiece. It is an example of the path Nintendo is going down. PH > TP.
Chill? I am in no way riled up... if I was, you'd know, hahaha...
Wow, you just contradicted yourself twice. You compared Sonic to potential future Zeldas. You're saying Zelda will suck because it'll be accessible to casual gamers. Then the comparison makes no sense because Sonic was
never dumbed down to appeal to the lowest common denominator.
Your second contradiction is "PH > TP". Phantom Hourglass was
obviously pandering to the casual crowd. It was devoid of challenge, unlike TP. So sorry, again, you're making no sense.