First of all, I want to say that this exactly the kind of post I wanted out of you glow, and I'm sorry if I got on your nerves to get it. I'll respond to the portions I think need addressing, but ftr don't really scumread you anymore. (Since reasoning stated fills the gaps that I couldn't ramify myself, with a crack that feels kinda genuine.)
it would be more accurate to say "i read all dedennes posts, concluded that their tone felt like tentative mafia and attempted to piece together why as best i could"
This is ultimately what I wanted originally when I asked.
i genuinely do not see how my post was nullified.
HOW is being hesitant because rusty = TOWN?
sure it doesn't necessarily mean = MAFIA as we have all come to see, but i still assert that hesitancy (from players that aren't new to the game) is not towny and mafia are more likely to play it safe with their lines or be nervous
Misinterpretation on my part, allow me to explain.
You initially responded to me and stated that the only pertinent point epona made was to do with the hesitancy, which I took to mean "my reasoning for voting was outside of the hesitancy". In my defense, I cleanly stated this assumption and it took you this long to state that it was wrong.
your second point: how does the "can't wait to read later" "damn there's nothing" = TOWN?
i guess you're saying it fits in better because.... of context? so they stated their expectation earlier, therefor it makes more sense for them to be genuinely disappointed later?
if their expectation was not stated beforehand it would not matter to me. the fact that it was, does not matter to me. the sentiment was ALREADY implied by dedennes comment about nothing rly happening and expecting more
My point wasn't that "can'ts wait to read later" "damn there's nothing" = TOWN, but instead that your reasoning was the "damn there's nothing" post was weird/unexpected. (And epona provided evidence that it wasn't unexpected, and that if anything it would've been weirder for them to not make it.)
I'm not saying it's a town post - I absolutely detest that sort of post, but don't think it's alignment relevant. But you didn't point out that post and claim that it was structured weirdly, you pointed at it and said it didn't make sense for dedenne to post. (Which it did.)
You absolutely could've brought this up at the start of day 2, but I had to essentially tunnel you to get it out of you.
Honestly, do I think you fabricated the read on dedenne? No. Not anymore - not even sure I was convinced you did even while I was applying a lot of pressure to you. I was just struggling to figure out your thought process and was committed to pushing you until I did - I do more or less now.
So to summerise, my new interpretation as to your stance on your day 1 lynch is "You read through dedenne and you found their tone off, you attempted to describe aspects of their play that you thought gave you this feeling, and posted that as your initial push."
Once again, and as always, please correct me if I'm wrong.
5) endless
i find endless' posts really difficult to read he kinda talks like professor layton (no hate i love professor layton) and it makes it difficult to parse through his wallposts. i feel like a lot of his reads are along the lines of 'you read this person this way and i read them the same way but for different reasons which means your reasons are wrong therefore i'm scumreading you' and i don't really know how to feel about that. i guess i'm a bit wary because the entire thread seems to treat him like some big bad with a notorious reputation but i've never played with him before so it means nothing to me. he asks a lot of questions but i need to see whether those questions actually lead anywhere or if it's just performative
I.. wha.. zha?
Like honestly the quip about my posting style is whatever, the comment about my actual play is also not hugely relevant but.......
i feel like a lot of his reads are along the lines of 'you read this person this way and i read them the same way but for different reasons which means your reasons are wrong therefore i'm scumreading you'
Can you please demonstrate one read I've had that matches this? The only player I shared on a read on for different reasons was my townread on Antonio that was shared by Kat, and I never scumread Kat.
I just.. find it difficult to understand this read in any way, shape, or form.
I'm going to need some follow up from epona.