Hoot-Hoot sig.

[Grawr]

What do you think of it? I personally thought it had a good forest-y look to it. And, I never used this particular render before.

 

[flabbergasted]

its cool

 

[TERRY16389]

Not bad. I like the warpy thingy at the top and bottom, makes it look like it's kinda flying into battle.

 

[flabbergasted]

i agree

 

[dragonflamez]

If you keep on abusing blurs like that I'ma slap cho in da' face.


-_-

 

[Fanghorn]

Gengar, I also don't like when you abuse the blurs and stuff like that.

If you just had the trees n' the backound and the hoot-hoot along with some sub-par text, the sig would of looked great.

I think the blurs should be used only in the backround. Same with the ripple effects you keep on adding. These pokemon sigs all look the same to me.

 

[Grawr]

I didn't think I was "abusing" the blurs...




I just thought the blurrs added sort of a half-frame thing to it. I didn't even use a ripple effect in this one, I too thought that was getting too repetitive...therefore it isnt used here.

 

[Grawr]

Okay, I took out the blurred-half-border thing. Whadda' ya think now? Better? Worse?

 

[Deleted User]

Hey hey hey hey. If he wants to blur everything out, well, it's his choice, isn't it? It's Gengar's sig, not your guys. His art, not yours. Let him do what he wants. <_<

 

[Grawr]

Hey hey hey hey. If he wants to blur everything out, well, it's his choice, isn't it? It's Gengar's sig, not your guys. His art, not yours. Let him do what he wants. <_<

Well, I did want to hear what everyone had to say. The people who critisized were, well, "constructive" about it, and thats excepted here. Constructive Critisizm will, hopefully, help me to become a better sig maker in the future!!!

Btw, welcome, friend!!!

 

[Deleted User]

*paces around in circles via Mother Hen* Ehhh. Anyway, I like it, though it is a bit plain. Maybe some other pokemon, smaller ones, in the background, mixed with the trees? I'm no sig maker...

 

[Zelandonia]

Personally, I liked the Blurs.

 

[Grawr]

Personally, I liked the Blurs.

Me too...

 

[Nate]

Personally, I liked the Blurs.

Without them, it looks like a Paint sig. Paste on a background, add text, and voila!

Maybe add some light brushes over the background, and maybe a gradient map.

 

[Grawr]

Personally, I liked the Blurs.

Without them, it looks like a Paint sig. Paste on a background, add text, and voila!

Maybe add some light brushes over the background, and maybe a gradient map.

AhhhH! Big words that involve gimp that I don't know what they mean!!!

*looks at Gradient*...

 

[Nate]

Personally, I liked the Blurs.

 

[Grawr]

Thanks much for the info, Flygon! I'm workin' on an entirely new sig now, hopefully a better one. I also made it smaller...just to try something different...

 

[Nate]

Thanks much for the info, Flygon! I'm workin' on an entirely new sig now, hopefully a better one. I also made it smaller...just to try something different...

Good luck! =)

 

[SL92]

Overall it's a good sig, but just a tad too simple and bit too large for that small a render.

 

[Grawr]

[quote="Shadow_] Overall it's a good sig, but just a tad too simple and bit too large for that small a render. [/quote]
Agreed, definately. Thats why the new sig I'm working on is much smaller.