Fair enough. You already said that you ran due to lag, though. You also supposedly admitted to not reading the rules the host had set. You're not in the right here.
The first set of rules I admit I did break but only because I couldn't read the tiny writing without my glasses. After that I appologised and didn't break one rule.
- - - Post Merge - - -
Yeah but I don't remember anyone's names
How do I lock it? Lol
The first set of rules I admit I did break but only because I couldn't read the tiny writing without my glasses. After that I appologised and didn't break one rule.
Well, that's enough reason for you to keep the ratings. You broke a rule. You're sorry. If you're sorry, you accept the rating. You made a mistake, and that's okay, but you need to deal with the consequences of that.
You can't give someone a bad rating because they helped out for 2 hours for free and they couldn't read the rules -____-
You can't give someone a bad rating because they helped out for 2 hours for free and they couldn't read the rules -____-
Not talking to anyone anymore. I just want to know any staff that are online.
It was like 2 seconds *facepalm*. Negative wifi ratings are for negative things.
I don't know how breaking a rule by accident for 2 seconds is negative.
FFS IM QUICKING. HELPING OUT IS MENT TO BE KIND. BYE IDIOTS
If what he's saying were to be completely true and he did apologize, I probably wouldn't give him a bad rating/remove it, but of course he's probably leaving out some stuff. Although, yeah, follow their rules.