Pokémon Least favorite legendary Pokémon

Sweetley

- Gone -
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Posts
8,963
Bells
0
Which legendary Pokémon is your least favorite and why?

To be honest, I'm not really a big fan of Latias and Latios. It's not like that I completely hate them, it's just that I never could make friends with them, as they are not appealing to me.
 
Last edited:
Rayquaza. Groudon and Kyogre look so awesome, but then here comes the dumb lip-gloss wearing snake. And the official pronunciation for its name is stupid.
 
Terrakion (soo ugly), whatever that fire/water type is because I always forget it even exists (can't even think of its name but I think it's from gen 6), and never really cared for Palkia and Dialga. I used to hate the cloud guys from Black/White but they've kind of grown on me now lol their alternate formes are weird though.. bird with a mustache.
 
you know, here's the thing about legendaries; some of them are really nice looking (legendary birds) and some are quite ugly (lake guardians) either way all these pokemon have features that make them different like when you see one you say "yep, that looks like a legendary pokemon" except for one in my opinion. alright I have nothing against him and I actually like this pokemon and his design however, Heatran just doesn't look like a legenday at all, he looks like some fire type pokemon, a very normal pokemon. he's cool but his design doesn't scream legendary especially compared to the others.
 
Last edited:
terrakion and those other bear-dog-things. and yeah azelf/uxie/mesprit, like come on three almost identical thing let alone their heads and colouring.
 
Yes! I totally agree with this. And also the Kami Trio; Tornadus, Thundrus, and Landorus. I just find them kind of stupid-looking.

I was going to say Shaymin because he just doesn't strike me as very "legendary" but you just reminded me that those things exist. They're just muscular guys on clouds who sometimes put on fur suits.
 
Arceus, for multiple reasons. One being the concept behind it was overrated IMO, two it's not a great design, and the third reason is personal
 
I don't dislike any Legendary Pokemon, but I do have gripes with some of them.

I cannot stand Lugia's gross hand wings, but I like everything else about it.

I love the look of Regigigas and wish that it weren't burdened with Slow Start, but with it it's just terrible. I hope, but don't expect, that someday Regigigas will receive a Primal Reversion to make it worth using at all.

If this were to extend to event/mythic Pokemon as well, I also have to state my disappointment with Meloetta. I have loved the design and concept since I first saw it but the execution is terrible. It would have been better if you could have switched between the Aria and Pirouette Formes with an item or NPC instead of having to sacrifice a moveslot to Relic Song and not even being able to retain the forme change outside of battle.
 
I dislike all of the Regi's.

There were only three, last time I played.
 
I dislike all of the Regi's.

There were only three, last time I played.

There is a 4th this time but yeah I agree I don't like them and they have insanely low catch rate unless you magically got plenty of master balls or heavy balls :(
 
Probably Volcanion because it's the only Legendary Pokemon I don't understand the point of, we already have two volcano Pokemon being Entei and Heatran so I don't understand their need to give us another one, other than finally pairing Water with every type... I also don't really understand the point of Diancie/Hoopa but Diance at least looks nice, and the concept of Hoopa being a "genie in a bottle" is a cool idea, even though both of them don't really have much purpose/origin lore-wise. It seemed like every Legendary Pokemon pre-Gen VI actually had an origin behind them, and even the Gen VI XYZ trio have an origin, but once we get to Diance and the game literally hands it and the next two Pokemon over to you, where all previous generations had an event that at least helped you understand their purpose. The placing of Diance, Hoopa and Volcanion just fees odd.

I also don't really like Type:Null, Silvally, or the Ultra Beasts as "legendary Pokemon". I like the UB's on their own as "Pokemon from another dimension" but I don't like them being called Legendaries (even though I know they are listed as such in the games code). Like, how does every Pokemon from another dimension that's been discovered thus far have the status of being a Legendary? Are there no regular Pokemon in that dimension? I feel like a Legendary Pokemon needs to have some kind of legend/origin behind it, and the Ultra Beasts just don't have anything. Type: Null and Silvally I just don't think are worthy of being Legendary Pokemon.
 
I like all of the legendary but the Regis are meh

there are just t o o many legendaries game freak calm down pls
 
@Jake, yeah I agree silvally/null shouldn't really be a legendary, more a regular "gift pokemon" or something.
 
Type: Null and Silvally I just don't think are worthy of being Legendary Pokemon.

ikrrrrrr

Like Silvally has been one of my favorite Gen 7 pokemon since I found out about it, but I actually didn't know it was a legendary until a few months ago (I don't play Sun/Moon/US/UM so idk it very well).

Maybe it could've been a pseudo-legendary or something like that, but it really doesn't need to be classified as a legendary pokemon.
 
Do ultrabeasts count? Because I hate all of them.

If not then I’d go with Regigigas, he’s just so bland compared to the others and pretty useless too
 
Last edited:
The regis easily, every other Legendary/Mythical Pokemon is fine by me.
 
Back
Top