Mario Enemy Sigs

[Bacon Boy]

Numero Uno:

Numero Dos:

Numero Tres:

C'n'C

(Don't comment on the quality of the gif please.)

 

[muffun]

Weird, the third one's flashes keep in time with the song I'm listening to.

 

[Ron Ronaldo]

Welll I think I like the first best, although the second one's pretty cool too. The third one is a good idea, but I find the flashing between them distracts me from both. ^^; Maybe if it went a little slower (although my compy seems to play gifs or whatever those are kinda fast so maybe it's slower to most people)?

 

[Bacon Boy]

Third one, fixed:

 

[NikoKing]

The first one's 10 focal points have a cheap filter effect to them, never do this stuff with focal points. There isn't really flow or depth in this signature. If it's meant to not have it, then alright. The .gif animation quality is good. Overall: 8.9/10.

 

[Bacon Boy]

The first one's 10 focal points have a cheap filter effect to them, never do this stuff with focal points. There isn't really flow or depth in this signature. If it's meant to not have it, then alright. The .gif animation quality is good. Overall: 8.9/10.

It's not meant to have flow. That's the only reason I added a filter. It looked horrible before. Thanks for the 8.9 though. Which one should I use?

 

[Kanye Omari West]

just filters?

 

[Bacon Boy]

just filters?

HEY! I had to render them and place them.

 

[Princess]

:/
strikingmatches likes 2nd best.

 

[djman900]

Dude that's sooo badass ^_^

 

[Kanye Omari West]

just filters?

HEY! I had to render them and place them.

background eraser tool

 

[Thunder]

Second one... burns... x_x

 

[Nate]

keep trying.

 

[Bacon Boy]

just filters?

HEY! I had to render them and place them.

background eraser tool

HAHA! Nope.

@Nate: YOU'RE BACK!

 

[SamXX]

just filters?

HEY! I had to render them and place them.

background eraser tool

HAHA! Nope.

@Nate: YOU'RE BACK!

Nate being the one who had Boxy as their av or sig for ages?

And I don't like it, it just lacks any style. Keep trying, the renderings good.

 

[Bacon Boy]

just filters?

HEY! I had to render them and place them.

background eraser tool

HAHA! Nope.

@Nate: YOU'RE BACK!

Nate being the one who had Boxy as their av or sig for ages?

And I don't like it, it just lacks any style. Keep trying, the renderings good.

Only problem with me, is I'm still running a CS2 without the first update. (Only thing we have.) So I don't have half of the brushes that you guys do.

 

[SamXX]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

background eraser tool

HAHA! Nope.

@Nate: YOU'RE BACK!

Nate being the one who had Boxy as their av or sig for ages?

And I don't like it, it just lacks any style. Keep trying, the renderings good.

Only problem with me, is I'm still running a CS2 without the first update. (Only thing we have.) So I don't have half of the brushes that you guys do.

Agh yeah because a few brushes would be nice, still a lot can be done without brushes (Most of my work doesn't use it) but it depends on what it is.

The placement is good though, the filter on v2 looks a bit too plain and makes everything look weird. Try erasing parts and lowering the opacity and stuff.

 

[Bacon Boy]

Quoting limited to 5 levels deep

HAHA! Nope.

@Nate: YOU'RE BACK!

Nate being the one who had Boxy as their av or sig for ages?

And I don't like it, it just lacks any style. Keep trying, the renderings good.

Only problem with me, is I'm still running a CS2 without the first update. (Only thing we have.) So I don't have half of the brushes that you guys do.

Agh yeah because a few brushes would be nice, still a lot can be done without brushes (Most of my work doesn't use it) but it depends on what it is.

The placement is good though, the filter on v2 looks a bit too plain and makes everything look weird. Try erasing parts and lowering the opacity and stuff.

The second one was just to mess with the filter and make everything look odd.

 

[JasonBurrows]

Very nice Bacon Boy.

 

[Roachey#2]

i like V3 the best