You state main ideas in the ending of the article.STORMTROOPER88888 said:The other points too. But you should have stated what the main idea is in the beginning.Bulerias said:You listed only one point.STORMTROOPER88888 said:
My best article ever
- Thread starter Bulerias
- Start date
Here's my main point.
In conclusion...
I hope you, the reader, didn't misunderstand this. I love the Wii and Nintendo's approach, but I feel that something is wrong. I finally realized what was wrong after showing my mother that FFIII opening trailer, and thing is, Nintendo needs to make games with meaning and beauty instead of just making games so that people would merely spend time...
In short, Nintendo needs to change their approach, but ever so slightly; all they need to do is launch a "Gaming Is Beautiful" game series, much like the Touch Generations series, but which can also appeal to the non-gamer. Hopefully, even though they're not reading this, they do something akin to what I mentioned.
In case you misunderstood my point of view, here's a chart-ish thing to sum it up... Let's detail how it would work, in the order of which a non-gamer would play these games.
1) Touch Generations - The non-gamer would get into gaming with this series, play it for a while, and then understand that there are bigger and better things ahead, and that the TG series was merely to get him or her into gaming.
2) Gaming Is Beautiful - This could be a series also for the non-gamer, but a bit more evolved one. This series would be more complicated than the TG in terms of artistic direction, music, and graphics, but not necessarily gameplay.
3) Nintendo's Usual Games - The non-gamer would, err, drop his title and move on to a gamer and play games like FF, Mana, Zelda, Mario, etc.
In conclusion...
I hope you, the reader, didn't misunderstand this. I love the Wii and Nintendo's approach, but I feel that something is wrong. I finally realized what was wrong after showing my mother that FFIII opening trailer, and thing is, Nintendo needs to make games with meaning and beauty instead of just making games so that people would merely spend time...
In short, Nintendo needs to change their approach, but ever so slightly; all they need to do is launch a "Gaming Is Beautiful" game series, much like the Touch Generations series, but which can also appeal to the non-gamer. Hopefully, even though they're not reading this, they do something akin to what I mentioned.
In case you misunderstood my point of view, here's a chart-ish thing to sum it up... Let's detail how it would work, in the order of which a non-gamer would play these games.
1) Touch Generations - The non-gamer would get into gaming with this series, play it for a while, and then understand that there are bigger and better things ahead, and that the TG series was merely to get him or her into gaming.
2) Gaming Is Beautiful - This could be a series also for the non-gamer, but a bit more evolved one. This series would be more complicated than the TG in terms of artistic direction, music, and graphics, but not necessarily gameplay.
3) Nintendo's Usual Games - The non-gamer would, err, drop his title and move on to a gamer and play games like FF, Mana, Zelda, Mario, etc.
No you don't. Main ideas should be put in the introduction and the idea is backed up with the rest of the article. Unless... you want to do it differently, but, it makes more sense for it to be in the beginning. And then in the conclusion you either go back to the main idea or finish it up with something else.Bulerias said:You state main ideas in the ending of the article.STORMTROOPER88888 said:The other points too. But you should have stated what the main idea is in the beginning.Bulerias said:You listed only one point.STORMTROOPER88888 said:
I like to do it this way - gradually get to the idea threw examples and facts in the main piece, and then present the main idea in the end for discussion.STORMTROOPER88888 said:No you don't. Main ideas should be put in the introduction and the idea is backed up with the rest of the article. Unless... you want to do it differently, but, it makes more sense for it to be in the beginning. And then in the conclusion you either go back to the main idea or finish it up with something else.Bulerias said:You state main ideas in the ending of the article.STORMTROOPER88888 said:The other points too. But you should have stated what the main idea is in the beginning.Bulerias said:You listed only one point.STORMTROOPER88888 said:
Well if ya want people to know what you're main idea is (which it sounds like because of capsBulerias said:I like to do it this way - gradually get to the idea threw examples and facts in the main piece, and then present the main idea in the end for discussion.STORMTROOPER88888 said:No you don't. Main ideas should be put in the introduction and the idea is backed up with the rest of the article. Unless... you want to do it differently, but, it makes more sense for it to be in the beginning. And then in the conclusion you either go back to the main idea or finish it up with something else.Bulerias said:You state main ideas in the ending of the article.STORMTROOPER88888 said:The other points too. But you should have stated what the main idea is in the beginning.Bulerias said:You listed only one point.STORMTROOPER88888 said:
) then maybe do it the other way.
Smart_Tech_Dragon_15
Retired Staff
I disagree. Nintendo's doing good now, they're pulling in people by the thousands, sitting on billions with a world franchise. To tell you the truth, I really don't see what they're doing wrong, and they seem to have a better forecast this year than some other gaming companies. If what I think may happen, and Sony's PS3 because of its high price will flop, Sony may have to make some major cuts in its video gaming industry. They've already made cut backs this year, and if they don't start making up for lost revenue, they'll be making more. :yes:
