What is New Health Care? As someone who's grown up with the blessing that is the NHS, I don't know how other healthcare systems work around the world, other than they're expensive and unaffordable to any regular citizen.
I feel you. I live in Canada and we get free health care! I mean, we do have to pay for the dentist, prescriptions and the eye doctor, unless we have insurance, which not all jobs provide. But it's still loads better than in the US. I honestly feel awful for the people down there. It's screwed. I'm hoping Trump will fix it but that's highly unlikely.
I feel you. I live in Canada and we get free health care! I mean, we do have to pay for the dentist, prescriptions and the eye doctor, unless we have insurance, which not all jobs provide. But it's still loads better than in the US. I honestly feel awful for the people down there. It's screwed. I'm hoping Trump will fix it but that's highly unlikely.
Sorry I don't know what "New Health Care" is? Which country is this a proposal for? I tried googling but just got results for "[how to get a] new health care card" (which eligible Australians have for even cheaper doctor visits and medications, around $6 per PBS script), or articles about Trump/Ryan's debacle.
(Bump?)
Maybe they're referring to this.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/06/us/politics/affordable-care-act-obamacare-health.html?_r=0
I don't think we should force people to pay for health insurance if they're healthy and don't need or want it. And while I think junk food and other unhealthy things should be taxed and go to pay for ObamaCare rather than forcing people to pay who don't want it, I do get some places don't have access to healthy food options, and I think that's something that needs to be fixed first and foremost. The goal should be for all places in the US to have access to fresh food that's a reasonable price, junk food/unhealthy habit items would be heavily taxed and those taxes would go to universal health care, and also allow private insurance companies compete for business so people still have options but can fall back on universal health care if needed.
I noticed once ObamaCare really hit that some prescription drug prices skyrocketed. One I can remember clearly is Epi-pen. I think forced insurance like this only allows drug manufactures to go rampant with their prices because people need them and now are forced into insurance or penalized. I don't think that's right. I think we should be negotiating down prices on medical equipment and medicines, not allow them to inflate to ridiculous prices so that people not only are forced onto insurance because of penalties, but are now also forced onto insurance any because prices are so ridiculous.
I think if we can negotiate the crazy prices on medical down, we can negotiate down insurance, and maybe come up with a universal insurance plan that works for everyone. But that won't happen if drug companies keep skyrocketing their prices just because they can.
*snip*
The reason why insurance prices are going up under Obamacare is because healthy people are choosing to pay the penalty which isn't that much instead of buying insurance which is more expensive. The way to bring insurance costs down would be to increase the penalty for not having insurance so healthy people buy insurance and the risk gets more spread out between healthy and sick people.
Taxing junk food makes sense from a health perspective, but that would be even more politically unpopular than the insurance mandate. Michael Bloomberg did that when he was mayor of New York, and he got a ton of crap for it.
This is one of the reasons why many countries have a single-payer system. If there is one main "insurance company", then the drug companies have to play ball with that group or they don't have any customers. Single-payer systems are able to leverage drug companies into charging reasonable prices. In the U.S. it's a lot easier for drug companies to gauge people because there are a lot of insurance companies and it is much harder for them to form a united front to force prices down.
Yes, that's true, but if said 27 year old doesn't have insurance and gets seriously sick or injured, then that person is really screwed. One of the issues with Obamacare is states refusing to expand Medicaid for people who can't afford insurance. More needs to be done to help people afford coverage, but letting people go without insurance is just a temporary bandage which eventually leads to much bigger problems.I'm not going to disagree with you because I know that's definitely why the prices are so crazy, it just sickens me to see people have to choose whether they can pay their mortgage or whether they can pay their forced insurance and they're really stuck in a hard place. And I just don't like the idea of penalizing people for not having something - if you're a 27 year old just getting started not finding a job that fits your diploma, being forced to pay all this extra stuff can be devastating. This is why I think taxing unhealthy habits would be a much better solution.
*Edit - The government doesn't force pedestrians to purchase car insurance even though pedestrians can still be involved in traffic accidents. Health care is definitely more complex but if you see my logic I'm very much in favor of not forcing people to pay for things they don't think they need.
Heck I think a person should be able to opt out of paying for the police/fire if they really want to but then the police/fire have no obligation to watch out for that person. Do I think it's a good idea to opt out of that? Definitely not and I would pay in to keep those services around, but if someone really decides they don't want it, they shouldn't have to pay and they should deal with the consequences of that choice when those consequences arise.
Yes, that's true, but if said 27 year old doesn't have insurance and gets seriously sick or injured, then that person is really screwed. One of the issues with Obamacare is states refusing to expand Medicaid for people who can't afford insurance. More needs to be done to help people afford coverage, but letting people go without insurance is just a temporary bandage which eventually leads to much bigger problems.
I understand that some people are ideologically libertarian on every issue, but sometimes it just doesn't make practical sense. If there is a burning building, the fire department doesn't have time to look through a database to see if a building is covered, and even if they could do it instantly, they have to douse the fire to prevent other stuff from catching on fire. Health care is similar. Doctors take an oath to treat any patient who comes through the doors. It doesn't matter whether the patient was irresponsible or couldn't afford insurance. It still ends up costing money though, and a lot of the cost of treating uninsured patients ends up being paid for by other people anyway, so it isn't that unfair to tell people to get covered or pay a penalty.