ppls agreement for not so strict constructionism

[beehdaubs]

Ya, his words are excactly the same ones i said when i posted the new ppls agreement, but the new ppls agreement i made GOT LOCKED AGAIN!!!!! Lets hope this one stays alive. I think storm and oddcrazyme are against this :'( so they keep finding ways to lock it. its frustrating.
btw, *signs*

 

[Megamannt125]

Ya, his words are excactly the same ones i said when i posted the new ppls agreement, but the new ppls agreement i made GOT LOCKED AGAIN!!!!! Lets hope this one stays alive. I think storm and oddcrazyme are against this :'( so they keep finding ways to lock it. its frustrating.

no i think its just Odd and Storm dont like me :'(

 

[beehdaubs]

Ya, his words are excactly the same ones i said when i posted the new ppls agreement, but the new ppls agreement i made GOT LOCKED AGAIN!!!!! Lets hope this one stays alive. I think storm and oddcrazyme are against this :'( so they keep finding ways to lock it. its frustrating.

no i think its just Odd and Storm dont like me :'(

True...true....but then why did they lock it when i made it? that means they must not like me either.....or it means that they just lividly hate the ppls agreement.

 

[Megamannt125]

Ya, his words are excactly the same ones i said when i posted the new ppls agreement, but the new ppls agreement i made GOT LOCKED AGAIN!!!!! Lets hope this one stays alive. I think storm and oddcrazyme are against this :'( so they keep finding ways to lock it. its frustrating.

no i think its just Odd and Storm dont like me :'(

True...true....but then why did they lock it when i made it? that means they must not like me either.....or it means that they just lividly hate the ppls agreement.

did you read my other post? i pmed odd to lock "the ppls agreement for not so strict constructionism by Mr Yippie not bdubs" i htink he got confused and locked yours, in yours it says "locked via member request" >.<

 

[beehdaubs]

:O how could you mega...HOW COULD YOU?!?!?!?!? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO....jk i forgive you....this ppls agreement will be the new official one i suppose o_o

 

[Megamannt125]

:O how could you mega...HOW COULD YOU?!?!?!?!? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO....jk i forgive you....this ppls agreement will be the new official one i suppose o_o

i refuse to make this the official one, know what forget about the ppls agreement its not going well lets just Wifi with whoever we want

 

[beehdaubs]

ok....what about the tyranny of the gentleman's agreement? lol....its not tyranny.....but they still won't play with us unless WE sign it....and i dun wanna....i like to time travel.....

 

[Megamannt125]

ok....what about the tyranny of the gentleman's agreement? lol....its not tyranny.....but they still won't play with us unless WE sign it....and i dun wanna....i like to time travel.....

theres a limit to the AC Friend list so i think theres enough ppl that would add us even though we didnt sign the agreement by storm

 

[crazygamer]

lol sign

 

[beehdaubs]

*revives*

 

[minimang]

why the heck would anyone even make this?
the whole point of the GAFSC was to make an agreement.. this is just basically saying that you didn't... so it's useless. Why even bother?

I disapprove of this topic. >.>

 

[Princess]

*sign* NVM copyright laws is what we need! coffeebean! 's words!

 

[ACCF lover]

signs

 

[iDandem]

Yup a copy of someone else's that I haven't signed because I believe Animal crossing sould be played how you want. Hack it if you please but don't cry about it, coz' I'm not hacking. Nice Sig Animal Crossing Fun REAL K.K!

 

[Megamannt125]

why the heck would anyone even make this?
the whole point of the GAFSC was to make an agreement.. this is just basically saying that you didn't... so it's useless. Why even bother?

I disapprove of this topic. >.>

You do know that most people who signed storms agreement just signed to get wifi friends. And most people signed and still Time Travel and etc.
And we have decided to ignore this, as it is a copy of a copy.

 

[beehdaubs]

BUt shouldn't we make a real one again?

 

[Megamannt125]

BUt shouldn't we make a real one again?

No. It is not needed.

 

[Link]

why the heck would anyone even make this?
the whole point of the GAFSC was to make an agreement.. this is just basically saying that you didn't... so it's useless. Why even bother?

I disapprove of this topic. >.>

I dissaprove of YOU.

 

[beehdaubs]

why the heck would anyone even make this?
the whole point of the GAFSC was to make an agreement.. this is just basically saying that you didn't... so it's useless. Why even bother?

I disapprove of this topic. >.>

I dissaprove of YOU.[/quote]Agreed