pizzapie44
Senior Member
antonin scalia's ghost is going to haunt this thread for all eternity
(Also, more relevant to the thread: It?s been shown that tax-funded birth control and sex ed programs actually save the government money because paying for education and safe sex practices is cheaper than paying for pregnancy and childbirth costs. paying for abortions instead of pregnancy/childbirth would definitely be cheaper as well. Do your research.)
If your opinion is blind to fact, I'm afraid that your opinion becomes null. You cannot be blind to fact.
No offense, but from that reply alone it kind of shows how little you recognize how this effects people.
But, to answer your question, yes. I do care very much.
They still have the right to believe what they want to believe. You may show me the facts that prove my opinion on a particular issue wrong and I can validate them, but I would still be stuck to my beliefs because I can get facts from the other side. No matter who you side with, facts backing both sides are correct, unless if it includes exaggerations or something objectively ridiculous (i.e. mining for coal makes you a plant hater, universal healthcare is bad because it's an Orwellian practice, taxes should be increased because the rich are evil). This is why I choose to stick with my pro-life opinions, even if Goshi's points are valid.
/take a shot every time u see the word child
But I haven't seen you counter Goshi's post yet, which leads me to assume that you have nothing to counter it with. You're giving reason for not changing your opinion but none of it, in my eyes, is justified until you can counter the argument.
Are you really sure that I need to reconsider my opinion? Do you really want me to become a pro-choicer instead of a pro-lifer? Because I'm not going to change my opinions, even under new knowledge, peer pressure, or internet posts.
They still have the right to believe what they want to believe. You may show me the facts that prove my opinion on a particular issue wrong and I can validate them, but I would still be stuck to my beliefs because I can get facts from the other side. No matter who you side with, facts backing both sides are correct, unless if it includes exaggerations or something objectively ridiculous (i.e. mining for coal makes you a plant hater, universal healthcare is bad because it's an Orwellian practice, taxes should be increased because the rich are evil). This is why I choose to stick with my pro-life opinions, even if Goshi's points are valid.
I'm asking you to provide some of that "counter argument" you spoke of earlier.
I'm also asking you not to ignore fact in favour of belief.
Despite that long post pointing out the facts, I am not changing my opinion on abortions. Even if they don't think an unborn fetus isn't considered a human, it's still a human to some, and not part of the woman's body either. It spends the first nine months developing in the woman's body, then once it's out, it's already viable, but still needs to develop (bone fusion, brain development etc.). I may see what you believe on the whole issue, and you may have a lot of evidence to back it up, but I still choose to believe that abortion is murder, taxpayer-funded abortions is government interference with religion, and that abortion rights should be limited. Whether or not I know more about the issue, I'm set in stone on my side.
I think it says a lot when people who call themselves "pro-life" want undocumented citizens to receive less healthcare.
Sorry for my misunderstanding of what you were saying.
I can't think too much of a counter-argument right now, but for that whole "pro-life linked to terrorism" part, all political issues have people like this, not just pro-lifers. There's eco-terrorism, Antifa, and a whole lot of other political violence issues. Usually the more controversial groups are the most threatened out of anything.
I think it says a lot when people who call themselves "pro-life" want undocumented citizens to receive less healthcare.
In the contrary, it makes perfect sense that illegal immigrants wouldn't get free healthcare. And do you know why? If you want to have the same citizenship rights as everyone else (financial aid, voting, food stamps, medicaid etc), you have to be a citizen. Now if they are traveling abroad and need healthcare, whether or not they are going for healthcare or tourism, but need healthcare, that's a different story. But if you're not a citizen of the United States, you shouldn't even live here. Unless if you want to sign up for amnesty, then that wouldn't be a problem. But we shouldn't have people crossing the borders or the seas illegally just to get free stuff.