Sig Survey

[DarthGohan1]

Please answer the following questions.
Thanks.

1)Do you feel that 500x200 is an acceptable sig limit?
2)If yes, why? If no, what would be better?
3)Do you experience loading times slower on TBT compared to other sites?
4)Do you think sig limits should become bigger as a reward (example - no warns for 2 months, active member = larger sig limit)?
5)Any other comments on the subject.


Thank you for your input.

 

[Grawr]

Please answer the following questions.
Thanks.

1)Do you feel that 500x200 is an acceptable sig limit?
2)If yes, why? If no, what would be better?
3)Do you experience loading times slower on TBT compared to other sites?
4)Do you think sig limits should become bigger as a reward (example - no warns for 2 months, active member = larger sig limit)?
5)Any other comments on the subject.


Thank you for your input.

I'm not good with computers, soo I dont really know what pixels are... all I know is, I HAD TO GET RID OF SOMETHING IN M' SIG BECUASE OF THAT DUMB RULE!

I think people should be able to have their sig be as big as they want, as long as it doesnt take forever to get to the next persons post because your too busy scrolling past someones sig (if that makes sense).
Lately today, I have noticed that it loads pretty slowly. It hasnt always been that way, though...
Sure, sig limits can become bigger as a reward, I guess...

 

[Jeremy]

Please answer the following questions.
Thanks.

1)Do you feel that 500x200 is an acceptable sig limit?
2)If yes, why? If no, what would be better?
3)Do you experience loading times slower on TBT compared to other sites?
4)Do you think sig limits should become bigger as a reward (example - no warns for 2 months, active member = larger sig limit)?
5)Any other comments on the subject.


Thank you for your input.

I'm not good with computers, soo I dont really know what pixels are... all I know is, I HAD TO GET RID OF SOMETHING IN M' SIG BECUASE OF THAT DUMB RULE!

I think people should be able to have their sig be as big as they want, as long as it doesnt take forever to get to the next persons post because your too busy scrolling past someones sig (if that makes sense).
Lately today, I have noticed that it loads pretty slowly. It hasnt always been that way, though...
Sure, sig limits can become bigger as a reward, I guess...

You didn't have to take the howle thing out. It was only a little bit over and you still have room width wise.

 

[DarthGohan1]

Please answer the following questions.
Thanks.

1)Do you feel that 500x200 is an acceptable sig limit?
2)If yes, why?

 

[Justin]

Please answer the following questions.
Thanks.

1)Do you feel that 500x200 is an acceptable sig limit?
2)If yes, why? If no, what would be better?
3)Do you experience loading times slower on TBT compared to other sites?
4)Do you think sig limits should become bigger as a reward (example - no warns for 2 months, active member = larger sig limit)?
5)Any other comments on the subject.


Thank you for your input.

1)Do you feel that 500x200 is an acceptable sig limit? -- No. Plain simple.
2)If yes, why? If no, what would be better? -- I mean think, 200 is tiny. I say 350 or 400 would be more like it. Maybe a little less.
3)Do you experience loading times slower on TBT compared to other sites? -- No.
4)Do you think sig limits should become bigger as a reward (example - no warns for 2 months, active member = larger sig limit)? -- Yes.
5)Any other comments on the subject. -- I'm with you.

 

[Grawr]

Please answer the following questions.
Thanks.

1)Do you feel that 500x200 is an acceptable sig limit?
2)If yes, why?

 

[Justin]

I agree with blathers and darth.

 

[Tennis=Life]

Please answer the following questions.
Thanks.

1)Do you feel that 500x200 is an acceptable sig limit?
2)If yes, why? If no, what would be better?
3)Do you experience loading times slower on TBT compared to other sites?
4)Do you think sig limits should become bigger as a reward (example - no warns for 2 months, active member = larger sig limit)?
5)Any other comments on the subject.


Thank you for your input.

1)Do you feel that 500x200 is an acceptable sig limit? -- No. Plain simple.
2)If yes, why? If no, what would be better? -- I mean think, 200 is tiny. I say 350 or 400 would be more like it. Maybe a little less.
3)Do you experience loading times slower on TBT compared to other sites? -- No.
4)Do you think sig limits should become bigger as a reward (example - no warns for 2 months, active member = larger sig limit)? -- Yes.
5)Any other comments on the subject. -- I'm with you.

I agree with you Justin. This is an outrage

 

[Mino]

1. Put simply: no.
2. I said no.
3. Yes, but it has no relation to signatures.
4. No.
5. File size is all that matters, as it is what really affects how long it takes to load an image. My sig has no problems with anyone and I'll be angry if I have to fix it just because of an illogical rule.

 

[Zero_13]

1)Do you feel that 500x200 is an acceptable sig limit?
2)If yes, why? If no, what would be better?
3)Do you experience loading times slower on TBT compared to other sites?
4)Do you think sig limits should become bigger as a reward (example - no warns for 2 months, active member = larger sig limit)?
5)Any other comments on the subject.

Answers:

1- Yes
2- Its big enough, and the bigger the badder for dial up users.
3- not really, its actually faster.
4- Bigger limits should be earned or bought.
5- ... Its good how it is right now, I mean, why would I want a bigger sig?

 

[Tyler]

I think it is fine becase if it is really big it will take forever to load for slow computers.

 

[DarthGohan1]

I think it is fine becase if it is really big it will take forever to load for slow computers.

is this true???

i have a widows 98 (really low Ram) and use IE, and my load times are fine...
even when people had big sigs before storm went oc.