lowkey, the demonizing omnivores with "you cannot be an animal lover who advocates for animal rights if you eat meat because you pay people to torture and rip out animal guts for your selfish consumption, therefore you love to torture animals" is a very upsetting "guilt trip" method. not because its "the harsh truth" but because it goes under the unfair beleif and prosecution of judgement that everyone who eats meat deliberately wishes harm and torture upon animals. there is a difference between disagreeing with inhumane torture of animals before death and beleiving in giving animals decent lives and a painless death. it can be argued that they ultimately have the same result. a dead animal. its better to live with decent lives and die without pain rather than be processed and tortured in an animal factory there is a difference in that. however, this is simply my opinion and philosophies that i beleive does not NEED to be enforced throughout the world. i can understand the heavy, emotional sentiment of beleiving that everyone who partakes in eating meat no matter the methods is placed under the same label as "murdurer"
another point, im really against those who enforce their vegan diets on pets who NEED meat in their diet especially those whose ancestors eat meat. such as cats and dogs. just because some hmans are capable of living without meat does not mean it can apply to other species. its possible for wolves to eat berries and cats to eat grass on the side, but their predomintory, natural diet that their own bodies were built for, is to capture and eat meat. also, i dont think veganism is for EVERY HUMAN, since every human's body is built different and has different needs.
despite my points/beleifs above with the prosecution and intolerance, i am still interested in getting to know more about veganism and its health benefits and deficiencies for humans, outside the ethics topic. and just in general, how it works for those who strictly follow it.
can someone who has an unbiased, and decent knowledge in the nutrients and vitamins in food that the human body needs, tell me what is the health pros and cons for having a vegan diet?
i know that eating alot more greens (60%) in comparison to the needed (10%) meat is much more healthier for human diet in general, while ive heard that vegans have nutrition deficiencies because they do not get enough calcium/iron/zinc/vitamin b12 that is found in meats, due to cutting out meat.
another point, im really against those who enforce their vegan diets on pets who NEED meat in their diet especially those whose ancestors eat meat. such as cats and dogs. just because some hmans are capable of living without meat does not mean it can apply to other species. its possible for wolves to eat berries and cats to eat grass on the side, but their predomintory, natural diet that their own bodies were built for, is to capture and eat meat. also, i dont think veganism is for EVERY HUMAN, since every human's body is built different and has different needs.
despite my points/beleifs above with the prosecution and intolerance, i am still interested in getting to know more about veganism and its health benefits and deficiencies for humans, outside the ethics topic. and just in general, how it works for those who strictly follow it.
can someone who has an unbiased, and decent knowledge in the nutrients and vitamins in food that the human body needs, tell me what is the health pros and cons for having a vegan diet?
i know that eating alot more greens (60%) in comparison to the needed (10%) meat is much more healthier for human diet in general, while ive heard that vegans have nutrition deficiencies because they do not get enough calcium/iron/zinc/vitamin b12 that is found in meats, due to cutting out meat.