Acre B-3 (TBT Chat Thread)

I personally like the Iron Dragon. Its one of those rides where theres no track, theres just a beam that the cart is connected to above you. ^.^ Its cool.

Also the older ones, like the Mean/Blue Streak (forgot the first part of its name) is a pretty old coaster too. Its still awesome.


:D
 
I have glasses now. D:

Yea last week was just my eye exam and getting the frame. Now I actually have them.
 
I enjoy 20/20 vision, yet cannot help but feel outnumbered.... <_<

So many people I know end up actually using contacts it is weird...
 
OddCrazyMe said:
I have glasses now. D:

Yea last week was just my eye exam and getting the frame. Now I actually have them.
I got my new ones last friday.
 
dragonflamez said:
Bulerias said:
Contacts? Glasses?

20/20 vision FTW.
FTW!
Visual acuity depends upon how accurately light is focused on the retina (mostly the macular region), the integrity of the eye's neural elements, and the interpretative faculty of the brain [8]. "Normal" visual acuity is frequently considered to be what was defined by Snellen as the ability to recognize an optotype when it subtended 5 minutes of arc, that is Snellen's chart 20/20 feet, 6/6 meter, 1.00 decimal or 0.0 logMAR. In humans, the maximum acuity of a healthy, emmetropic eye (and even ametropic eyes with correctors) is approximately 20/16 to 20/12, so it is inaccurate to refer to 20/20 visual acuity as "perfect" vision. 20/20 is the visual acuity needed to discriminate two points separated by 1 arc minute. The significance of the 20/20 standard can best be thought of as the lower limit of normal or as a screening cutoff. When used as a screening test subjects that reach this level need no further investigation, even though the average visual acuity of healthy eyes is 20/16 or 20/12.

ding!
 
Dont make fun of me glasses!

-cries-

-glasses get wet-

-wipes off glasses-

-repeats process-
 
STORMCOMMANDER said:
dragonflamez said:
Bulerias said:
Contacts? Glasses?

20/20 vision FTW.
FTW!
Visual acuity depends upon how accurately light is focused on the retina (mostly the macular region), the integrity of the eye's neural elements, and the interpretative faculty of the brain [8]. "Normal" visual acuity is frequently considered to be what was defined by Snellen as the ability to recognize an optotype when it subtended 5 minutes of arc, that is Snellen's chart 20/20 feet, 6/6 meter, 1.00 decimal or 0.0 logMAR. In humans, the maximum acuity of a healthy, emmetropic eye (and even ametropic eyes with correctors) is approximately 20/16 to 20/12, so it is inaccurate to refer to 20/20 visual acuity as "perfect" vision. 20/20 is the visual acuity needed to discriminate two points separated by 1 arc minute. The significance of the 20/20 standard can best be thought of as the lower limit of normal or as a screening cutoff. When used as a screening test subjects that reach this level need no further investigation, even though the average visual acuity of healthy eyes is 20/16 or 20/12.

ding!
Bah. I have 6 eyes anyways.
 
STORMCOMMANDER said:
dragonflamez said:
Bulerias said:
Contacts? Glasses?

20/20 vision FTW.
FTW!
Visual acuity depends upon how accurately light is focused on the retina (mostly the macular region), the integrity of the eye's neural elements, and the interpretative faculty of the brain [8]. "Normal" visual acuity is frequently considered to be what was defined by Snellen as the ability to recognize an optotype when it subtended 5 minutes of arc, that is Snellen's chart 20/20 feet, 6/6 meter, 1.00 decimal or 0.0 logMAR. In humans, the maximum acuity of a healthy, emmetropic eye (and even ametropic eyes with correctors) is approximately 20/16 to 20/12, so it is inaccurate to refer to 20/20 visual acuity as "perfect" vision. 20/20 is the visual acuity needed to discriminate two points separated by 1 arc minute. The significance of the 20/20 standard can best be thought of as the lower limit of normal or as a screening cutoff. When used as a screening test subjects that reach this level need no further investigation, even though the average visual acuity of healthy eyes is 20/16 or 20/12.

ding!
Never called it perfect, haha.
 
Kyle said:
dragonflamez said:
STORMCOMMANDER said:
dragonflamez said:
Bulerias said:
Contacts? Glasses?

20/20 vision FTW.
FTW!
Visual acuity depends upon how accurately light is focused on the retina (mostly the macular region), the integrity of the eye's neural elements, and the interpretative faculty of the brain [8]. "Normal" visual acuity is frequently considered to be what was defined by Snellen as the ability to recognize an optotype when it subtended 5 minutes of arc, that is Snellen's chart 20/20 feet, 6/6 meter, 1.00 decimal or 0.0 logMAR. In humans, the maximum acuity of a healthy, emmetropic eye (and even ametropic eyes with correctors) is approximately 20/16 to 20/12, so it is inaccurate to refer to 20/20 visual acuity as "perfect" vision. 20/20 is the visual acuity needed to discriminate two points separated by 1 arc minute. The significance of the 20/20 standard can best be thought of as the lower limit of normal or as a screening cutoff. When used as a screening test subjects that reach this level need no further investigation, even though the average visual acuity of healthy eyes is 20/16 or 20/12.

ding!
Bah. I have 6 eyes anyways.
Are you a bug? Like a fly? Flies are teh annoying.


Glasses are sorta good because if you look up when its raining, the glasses block your eyes. The glasses shield your eyes. Glasses FTW.
Flies have 2 eyes.

I have 6.
 
Back
Top