• Guest, you're invited to help build our new TBT time capsule! It contains three parts, with some of its elements planned to open in 2029 and others not until the distant future of 2034. Get started in 2024 Community Time Capsule: Blueprints.

Mafia Bravely Default Mafia

At this point I feel mafia was super lazy, or newbies or mafia was trying to blame Kills on inactives. Right now, I'm a bit suspicious of Blue rose and Tom. Dad may have a safe claim but, as of now, I trust him.

- - - Post Merge - - -

At this point I feel mafia was super lazy, or newbies or mafia was trying to blame Kills on inactives. Right now, I'm a bit suspicious of Blue rose and Tom. Dad may have a safe claim but, as of now, I trust him.
oh yeah problem has been slipping by right now, I'd like to know what they have to say.
 
Why no kill??

..???

- - - Post Merge - - -

rereading the thread atm, this is just bizarre to me. Unless they're just frickin mega lazy
 
hey i skimmed the thread. what's up
all i see is dad claiming 2-shot vig or something

- - - Post Merge - - -

*it's the main topic at hand but i think it's been cleared up
 
ok lmao since there's nothing to go on here are some mild observations.

Trundle voted sonrio with no explanation. When asked to explain they piggybacked onto Waffle's explanation about them being third party (which I did too admittedly, I was flustered that I was being accused). Generally evasive and quick to point out other's flaws rather than defend themself. May just be their play style but it masks intent well, plus if the no kill was actually intentioned then (as mentioned by Dad) Trundle is one of the suspects.

Tom has been noted to post more than usual (apparently idfk) on day 1 and their inactive stance within the game makes them another suspect for intentioned no kill. Capella as well. I actually suspect Capella more if it was a lazy no kill since they seem to just not care about the game.

Other "inactive ingame but online elsewhere" are also suspicious, like NikkiNikki and Blu Rose.

Sorry if these are obvious/irrelevant. I'm kind of annoyed that the mafia was being lazy. Or maybe they didn't know KP couldn't be stacked.
 
ok lmao since there's nothing to go on here are some mild observations.

Trundle voted sonrio with no explanation. When asked to explain they piggybacked onto Waffle's explanation about them being third party (which I did too admittedly, I was flustered that I was being accused). Generally evasive and quick to point out other's flaws rather than defend themself. May just be their play style but it masks intent well, plus if the no kill was actually intentioned then (as mentioned by Dad) Trundle is one of the suspects.

Tom has been noted to post more than usual (apparently idfk) on day 1 and their inactive stance within the game makes them another suspect for intentioned no kill. Capella as well. I actually suspect Capella more if it was a lazy no kill since they seem to just not care about the game.

Other "inactive ingame but online elsewhere" are also suspicious, like NikkiNikki and Blu Rose.

Sorry if these are obvious/irrelevant. I'm kind of annoyed that the mafia was being lazy. Or maybe they didn't know KP couldn't be stacked.

No Tom isn't known to post more on day 1.

Also Trundle didn't defend himself because he had nothing to defend... and he stated that his reason for voting for Sonrio was because he claimed he was Mafia.
 
No Tom isn't known to post more on day 1.

Also Trundle didn't defend himself because he had nothing to defend... and he stated that his reason for voting for Sonrio was because he claimed he was Mafia.

I meant Tom's been posting more in this game on Day 1, more than he usually does
 
Toms only defense was saying that it's the beginning of the game and that he posts more later so I'd like to see what he has too say.
 
Putting my vote in for NikkiNikki tonight since I'm headed to bed & then to work (and I'm not usually home until close to day/night end).

There's not a whole lot to work with just yet - I'm trusting in Dad's claim right now based on justice's comments, the fact that nobody has stepped up to claim protection (or otherwise) & in my opinion the Mafia being too lazy to vote seems more likely than not killing on purpose.

NikkiNikki is one of the people I would consider to be "too lazy" to vote, along with Blu Rose & Capella. Activity in other parts of the site aside, they only posted once during day 1, didn't vote, didn't post at all during night 1, and hasn't posted so far during day 2.

We'll see if anyone comes out of the woodwork before the lynch... also wanted to note that Endless has been MIA since early this morning. Strange since he game out of the gate with guns blazing.

- - - Post Merge - - -

*came. Came out of the gate. Ugh.
 
Also want to note that NikkiNikki is normally a pretty active player if I remember correctly so I'm not sure what's going on there.
 
I believe you, Dad. But stop playing like an idiot. Hey, Tom, who do you think is scum?
You~

Tom is around too, sheeyut.

I know he's around.

Scom

Tom has been noted to post more than usual (apparently idfk) on day 1 and their inactive stance within the game makes them another suspect for intentioned no kill. Capella as well. I actually suspect Capella more if it was a lazy no kill since they seem to just not care about the game.

Other "inactive ingame but online elsewhere" are also suspicious, like NikkiNikki and Blu Rose.

Sorry if these are obvious/irrelevant. I'm kind of annoyed that the mafia was being lazy. Or maybe they didn't know KP couldn't be stacked.

As much as I'd like to experiment with not killing anyone the entire game and letting you nerds lynch each other, I doubt very seriously I would be able to convince a team to not kill as well. I'd have better luck just getting Trundle, Nikki or Daddio lynched. Capella tends to just avoid posting as scum, so it'll be blatantly obvious soon enough I suppose if Scumella is here.

Really I'm just wondering why nobody is questioning why Dad was able to kill two people. I can't recall a mafia game where the 2 shot vig was able to use both shots in the same night, that's pretty OP if you ask me. So Daddy, are you actually a protagonist like you claim to be or do you bleed red? :lemon:
 
also wanted to note that Endless has been MIA since early this morning. Strange since he game out of the gate with guns blazing.
Pretty sure I mentioned in my first post that I didn't expect to post much due to heavy school requirements. First day was the end of the weekend, I'm unlikely to have a block of free time like that again for a few days.

Alright now down to business. Host accidentally spewed Dad town, we're never lynching him ever. (It wasn't a safeclaim provided him since host said 'your' in the message, reportedly. Don't feel bad justice people make these sort of errors all the time. You should've seen what he responded to that with and responded to that, as to not effect the game.)

Side note, host spewed that mafia have provided safeclaims. It wouldn't have been on their mind if it wasn't on their mind at game begin. And if it was on their mind game begin then they'd have made sure it was accounted for. AKA we're going to have to look twice at trustworthy name-claims.

FTR the mafia probably killed one of the 2 Dad killed. It's not all that unlikely since there were 16 people at the beginning of the night, and 1 of them was him, and 4-5 of them were mafia, tackling it down to around 2/10 or 1/5 chance of it occuring.
Dad, double shooting was stupid no matter how you look at it. I'm not crucifying you for it, I'm just saying. No crying over spilled milk shtick.

Forget the activity comparison to meta for now since people have goddamn lives, and sometimes they need to focus on them. Day 1 was mothers day. I'm surprised we got the amount of activity we did.

I'm down for lynching Tom, and probably for lynching Audino too. Oh yeah, pillow bunny has mafiatold if anything; stop townreading them. No one comes into mafia that naive. "Do Mafia know each other?" isn't the sort of question you ask, even when you've never played before. If they're mafia they're overplaying the new player card, if they're town they're asking questions they've already intuitively figured out the answer to overplay the newbie card. Either way, it's not townie don't townread it.

There's some other stuff I want to respond to at some point but that'll have to duck around SAC preparation. (SACs are kinda like SATs.)
 
If we're looking twice at trustworthy name claims then kindly direct your spotlight at Dad, he's the one prancing about as a Party Member. And if I read host's post correctly, mafia MAY have been provided safe claims. It's not concrete and ultimately we could waste way to much time playing name games.
 
What did I even do tho. Two ppl have accused me with nothing no explanation already. Do I just give off a mafia vibe or what.

- - - Post Merge - - -

If we're looking twice at trustworthy name claims then kindly direct your spotlight at Dad, he's the one prancing about as a Party Member. And if I read host's post correctly, mafia MAY have been provided safe claims. It's not concrete and ultimately we could waste way to much time playing name games.

If safeclaims are in place all bets are off. And I'm probably be reading into it but Dad's post about DarkOnyx and Waffles just before the lynch seems a bit calculated? Like he was planning to claim vig?
 
If we're looking twice at trustworthy name claims then kindly direct your spotlight at Dad, he's the one prancing about as a Party Member. And if I read host's post correctly, mafia MAY have been provided safe claims. It's not concrete and ultimately we could waste way to much time playing name games.
Jesus christ. You managed to read some of my post but you somehow missed this part:
Alright now down to business. Host accidentally spewed Dad town, we're never lynching him ever.

Tom's last post is also a marvel of atrocity. The reasoning on audino is the horrible wagoning/switching around sonrio and Rune day one, coupled with the off posts midday yesterday. True, it's not the strongest case, but it's there.
The case on you on the other hand..

Petition to tie Tom up to the stake.

- - - Post Merge - - -

awwww pillow bunny is so cute
haha justice got interrogated in their own mafia game
*cough* stop fillering *cough*
Like seriously how hard is it to post 1 useful post?

Oh yeah and I found this gem:
I voted Sonrio for saying he/she was scum.
Trundle voted sonrio with no explanation. When asked to explain they piggybacked onto Waffle's explanation about them being third party.

Pretty sure both Tom and Audino are mafia. Leggo.
 
Back
Top