visibleghost
ʕ •̀ o •́ ʔ
what's up 2day we're talking about if people who have problem they brought on themselves in one way or another deserve help, sympathy and healthcare. anywayz uhh let's Begin and also b nice to each other and remember that whomstever you're talking to or about is a human person and all that lol
So, should people who made decisions that made them sick or injured them be helped?
some examples are self inflicted injuries or health problems are suicide attempts, self harm, drug abuse, injuries due to criminal activity (gang violence etc.), medical problems caused by plastic surgery and medical issues due to engaging in memes or trends (eating tide pods).
some people think people made their bed and now have to lie in it, therefore they don't deserve healthcare, help or sympathy and that taxpayer's money should go to helping people who didn't "bring this on themselves."
on the other hand there are people who think people deserve help, sympathy and healthcare no matter how they got their issue, because yes it might be stupid to eat tide pods for memes but they still need help.
so, what do u all think?
i guess this is a bigger issue in places where healthcare is funded by taxes because people don't want to pay for other people's bad choices but you can still have an opinion on it even if you're not paying for someone else since it's a moral issue too and whatever.
i think that aside from thinking people only have themselves to blame is very unsympathetic and ignorant of other people's situations, a giant issue with implementing a system where these people get treated differently (paying more or whatever) would be knowing where to drag the line. are mental health issues and drug abuse the people suffering from it's fault, meaning they shouldn't get the same help? are injuries due to a hobby (breaking a bone playing sports, being kicked by a horse, slicing your finger off when cooking) the person's fault, since after all they knew that there are risks with engaging in the hobby and they could have prevented it from happening by not doing it? should smokers get treated for cancer and should former or current alcoholics get liver transplants?
So, should people who made decisions that made them sick or injured them be helped?
some examples are self inflicted injuries or health problems are suicide attempts, self harm, drug abuse, injuries due to criminal activity (gang violence etc.), medical problems caused by plastic surgery and medical issues due to engaging in memes or trends (eating tide pods).
some people think people made their bed and now have to lie in it, therefore they don't deserve healthcare, help or sympathy and that taxpayer's money should go to helping people who didn't "bring this on themselves."
on the other hand there are people who think people deserve help, sympathy and healthcare no matter how they got their issue, because yes it might be stupid to eat tide pods for memes but they still need help.
so, what do u all think?
i guess this is a bigger issue in places where healthcare is funded by taxes because people don't want to pay for other people's bad choices but you can still have an opinion on it even if you're not paying for someone else since it's a moral issue too and whatever.
i think that aside from thinking people only have themselves to blame is very unsympathetic and ignorant of other people's situations, a giant issue with implementing a system where these people get treated differently (paying more or whatever) would be knowing where to drag the line. are mental health issues and drug abuse the people suffering from it's fault, meaning they shouldn't get the same help? are injuries due to a hobby (breaking a bone playing sports, being kicked by a horse, slicing your finger off when cooking) the person's fault, since after all they knew that there are risks with engaging in the hobby and they could have prevented it from happening by not doing it? should smokers get treated for cancer and should former or current alcoholics get liver transplants?