I entirely misinterpreted you here and apologise. My understanding was your list being a list of reasons he was town - but it absolutely makes sense to list a justification for something he was doing given that the post you were responding to mentions his "sketchy behaviour".
Well my original question was asking your reasoning for townlocking Antonio. I assumed that you were answering that question in your reply. If you want to justify his behavior in this game by relating it with his past meta, that’s your call. I can’t attest to it because I’ve never played with him or read through any past games in which he’s participated in. But for me, being new to his supposed playstyle, I think my suspicions are more than reasonable.
In the perspective of the entire 36hr phase, in the last hour of the game, there was a sudden consideration for Dedenne and myself when that wasn't much of an option before. It would be obviously suspicious for Mafia to suddenly push them all of the suddenly, I believe their best option was to wait a bit before pushing them.
This is valuable information. Glow's behavior is suspicious in this and I would also like to see their opinions on Epona's rebuttal. I also find it odd that Kat, Epona, and Ronishy changed their vote suddenly with a similar excuse between the three. What worries me is Mafia is known to cause chaos near EOD, confusing everyone about their votes.
For the same reason Volt reads are important, so we can understand the motives behind their actions since it was confirmed that Dedenne was town.
Why is their post towny exactly?
It was a serious idea that came across my mind during the second time. The first time was a joke. As I stated, I had no solid concerns on who to vote for at the time so rnging was something that came to mind.
this is the train of thought that threw me off. within 20 mins, you grasped at who to vote for by asking others/following majority. why lie low and follow majority/change willingness to vote for people within such a short timespan? if you truly believed me to be scum, you should've voted for me instead of hopping on wagons. it's the same reason i don't understand antonio jumping their train of thought to whatever majority believes at the time (abandoning the option of eliminating a random until i proposed to). leaves too much room to remain inconspicuous and claim "oopsie! my bad uwu!"
i never said i was. i mentioned you abandoning that train of thought until i addressed it again, which is incredibly odd to me. if it's what you truly believed, you should've advocated for it (as i did) instead of proposing rng 2.0
Have you not read my statement regarding why I voted for an inactive or are you just ignoring so you can repeat your "voting for an inactive is useless" statement.but like, by the looks of it evan wasn't rly going to be voted to be lynched so ur vote was just pointless anyway, rng'ing it seems just as anti town to me than being inactive
Post automatically merged:
i haven't actually read the thread yet so actually maybe me and evan were actually close to being lynched tho
Post automatically merged:
i guess tho like i know i'm town, mafia would probably be ok with the inactives being lynched
I didn't abandoned the thought after you reproposed the idea, I abandoned the thought after we talked over the pros and cons in the thread.
i understand the context. antonio still was a viable cfd candidate because he was up for elimination w/ 2 votes lower. antonio EASILY could've had a cfd against him, regardless of what you said
i agree w this for mountainous, people need to be in the hot seat in this mode to garner any sort of response. town won't win unless there's active discussion and everyone is questioned
