I just have some disagreements with this statement.
At the time I traded with him, he had fewer negative reviews.
Also, because of my mishap with this Wifi System, I disagree with your connotation of the review.
For two months I have been rejected and chastised for my own rating of 94%.
You are right however, that it is people's fault for choosing who they want to trade with. But if someone were in my shoes, I would overlook that one review and trade anyways.
Are you saying that because of my faulty review, you wouldn't trade or accept with me or anyone that has been in my shoes?
Are you saying that "that is why we have the wifi rating, to let you know who and who not to trade with" applies to me because I have a mistaken 94%? Are you agreeing with the people who chastised me about it?
I did find that rude and insulting. So thank you for that chastisement. Even though my problem has been resolved, it hasn't been resolved fully. This needs to be dealt with properly.
i still stick by what i said, regardless of how many "less" negative ratings they had, he still had 4, two of them explicitly stating he was a scammer, that should have been red flag from the get go.
If they have a low rating, don't trade with them. Simple. I never said no one would trade with you because of your neg rating, I said you should sus people out before you trade. Obviously if someone has one negative rating, with no actual legit reason behind it, then if they're nice enough, they'll trade with you - which is like 90% of the people on this forum so maybe you were just trading with the wrong people? I've had some stupid bull**** neg rating for over a year now, that the mods refuse to remove, even when I have explained the situation to them multiple times, on how it was a misunderstanding, etc.. I'm the exact situation as you (well were, because you weaseled your way out of your negative rating), and I never once had someone refuse me service because I had 1 negative rating. I really do think you were just trading with the wrong people, because like I said, the majority in this community are nice enough to over look one neg rating. So please stop trying to soak up attention like a sponge because people were "chastising" you over one negative rating. A fair chunk of people here have at least one negative rating, and they don't seem to have an issue with trades. Maybe the Club Nintendo side of things are weird after the scam crusade, idk, I've never traded Club Nintendo codes because their rewards suck.
If you're someone who has multiple negative ratings (like the user in question), and actually have ones that say they're a scammer, then no, a normal, level-headed person probably wouldn't trade with them. So yeah, tbh I do think it's your own fault for not checking out your surroundings before going through with the trade, and i'm not one of the people who refused to trade with you because of your "94% wifi rating", so stop taking it out on me just because I was the only one here with balls enough to speak the truth, and not come to your side slapping on sympathy.
and tbf "revenge ratings" are against the rules as it, and you literally gave him a neg rating bcoz you were butthurt because he called you a scammer. i don't see how "harassment" is a fair issue for a negative rating, when it's blatantly obvious anyone would be upset had they thought they'd been scammed, and given the recent scam that went on by a certain user with club nintendo codes, it's really no surprise they didn't believe you.
i didn't come here to start a fight, i came here simply to speak my mind on the situation, and essentially give you a fair warning that next time you should have taken the wifi rating system into account, and that hopefully you learned your lesson. i don't know why you're being so passive aggressive.
and i did say that i wasnt trying to be rude so if you interpenetrated it as rude then sorry, but that's your own problem for not knowing how to read internet comments properly. and yes, this post sounds rude, but it's really not my intention at all. truth =/= rudeness and if you chose to interpret it that way then sorry.
Keep in mind that when we remove a signature, it doesn't necessarily mean we're going around inspecting every single signature we see down to the pixel ourselves like you might be imagining.
umm yes u do pls dont lie
