Yeah, personally I'm willing to lynch Farobi bc I don't that Ness would have a lyncher two games in a row, and Farobi's response wasn't so much a defense but an attempt to discredit the investigation itself.
Thoughts as I read back
The role description says once you frame someone the next day your target gets killed 
- - - Post Merge - - -
IM LEGIT SERIOUS
Ok, actually kinda less comfortable bc waffles seems to be describing a role cop. Waffles, what did you mean with the bolded
my scum lean is dooby and waffles
I find it weird how Farobi goes from agreeing with me to having me in his top two sus in two posts. Yeah, I know he had a grievance with me "plugging to establish my townieness", but his reason to sus me is as follows.
dolby because he's making too much sense oWo
waffles was more a joke read but if u want reasoning shes trying to lynch a randtown!
A-ahh! I have to uh.. see my pl-plans first... Do-don't worry! I will be back at a more.. convenient.. time.
No, that's not a reason to sus someone. That's him floundering trying to justify against the person who he's sussed. He even admits that Waffles is a random suspicion
That being said, I actually kinda have some concerns about the timeline of Waffles claim. She claimed at day start, but didn't vote Farobi for three hours later, but claimed to received her result when the game started. I'd expect her to have voted and began to push immediately. However, she did wait to seriously claim until after she voted, so I'm going to look back and try to see if she's been a cop before in a (recentish) game.
However, Farobi is really acting differently, so yeah, I trust waffles over Farobi
Im hella legit day cop its even green text smh
Credit for being the first to say this
Waffles did you come to this game just to tunnel me :^( if youre town then you're wasting time trying to put me up for lynch and town efforts too. If youre scum then eh, it'll make more sense but i doubt it atm. I'll be in the thread for a couple hours but i cant answer yet because im in a thing, but lay out some things so i can respond to ur suspicions.
As I said this before, I don't like this. It dismisses the possibility of Waffles being a day cop when she has seriously claimed, and the possibility of Farobi himself being a miller.
I get you are serious but how can rest of town agree to this? Im just as curious as to why you hold these suspicions on me
Delibratly not pushing Waffles and pretending to act confused. While I also see some reason to doubt waffles claim, Farobi's method of defending himself does not sit right with me. His attempts, again, focus on him defending from
the possibility of having been inspected, and dismissing Waffles as a fake claim. I think he'd at least consider the possibility of him being a miller
Well by the time I receive role pm it did says I could investigate before day 1 starts and so I decided to send an action to investigate you and it says "Farobi is not innocent ( ͡? ͜ʖ ͡?)"
It's cheesy I know
eh
ehhhhhhhhhh
I guess one way to confirm what your role does is to inspect yourself in Day 2 phase and see what it reveals to you. Or inspect me again if it's the same thing but that's probably just gonna waste your inspect if your role is what I think it is. But hey, variety of options my dude.
Isn't even doubting the legitness of Waffles claim, despite the result. He's playing for time here
Kat is still my definitive townlean.
I want to say Waffles is town as well, because this is extremely odd for any third-party or maf to be doing
I kinda like how Locket flowed into the game wither her colored text
If one of the post-restricted people is sus right now it's Punchy right now for me honestly, but I haven't seen good reason to really sus any of them
Glow and ily have both been uncharacteristically silent.
Farobi is the person that I most suspect right now. I actually like his vote on Punchy, and will say that I don't think that him/Punchy are teammed, but waffles claim and his weak as **** response which consists of him dismissing the inspection, first by saying that Waffles is fake claiming, then saying that it's a bad result without elaborating in the options just seems like maf play (particularly the first bit)
