the wage gap isnt real
Do you believe in alternative facts?
the wage gap isnt real
Do you believe in alternative facts?
I believe in the side that the media doesn't report on.
I didn't reply to you so why did you reply to me?
I didn't reply to you so why did you reply to me?
Because it's a thread. Why do you care if I reply to you?
Do you believe in alternative facts?
eh there could be truth to some
The wage gap doesn't take into consideration of women having pregnancies, women tending to work less hours, women's choices in career, etc.
oh wow but did u know women are discriminated bc of that too !! women dont get paid maternity leave in the us!! women lose their kons bc theyre having children . thats not Cool
So women working less hours and wanting to get pregnant is discrimination. Ok.
So women working less hours and wanting to get pregnant is discrimination. Ok.
A woman working less hours just means she works less hours. Why should that mean that she gets paid less for the hours she DOES work?
A fair amount of women do leave work (often temporarily) because they're a mother. You can't deny that. That's what isn't put into consideration with the "wage gap."Not everyone *wants* to be pregnant, just wanted to point that out right quick.
The wage gap doesn't take into consideration of women having pregnancies, women tending to work less hours, women's choices in career, etc.
She doesn't get paid less for the hours she works. It's illegal to pay someone based on gender. Equal pay act of 1963 is one example of it being illegal.
Just because one said women gets paid less than one said man does not mean it's because of gender. Job performance, amount of hours that's worked, et cetera all go into how much you're paid.
- - - Post Merge - - -
A fair amount of women do leave work (often temporarily) because they're a mother. You can't deny that. That's what isn't put into consideration with the "wage gap."
Studies have also shown women were happier before the third wave of feminism hit.
So women working less hours and wanting to get pregnant is discrimination. Ok.
... I don't work less hours (than the average in my sector, early childhood education), nor do I want to get pregnant. In fact, for medical reasons I am unable to carry a foetus to term (or viability outside of my uterus). So pregnancy is *completely* out of the question for me.
What an inconsiderate comment.
Men are welcome to start wanting to get pregnant and all that comes with that *choice* just as soon as science finds a way. In the meantime, society kinda needs at least some women to want to carry children.
So maybe don't make life so incredibly difficult for women in the meantime, yeah? Just a thought. Access to appropriate health (including reproductive services) is crucial for people in general but especially those looking to start a family.
Penalising those people who are willing to procreate - as the current situation effectively does in many respects - is shortsighted at best. And absolutely qualifies as discrimination, whether malicious or not.