Tbh, I feel like I can see a big difference in the method that Dads going about this than compared to last game. More up-front and seeking to directly interact with people more (though this could be due to me creating something to actually talk about)
Kinda feel like I can see the wheels turning in Runes head, but strange that there hasn?t been anything like in past games that made me townlock him
Now for the elephant in the room, the RQS. As I said at the time, my brain was fried, but after last game when there was no discussion for pretty much half the day I felt that there should be an RQS posted, of at least to get people posting. Frankly, exempting Q3, none of the questions were designed to do anything except get people to at least display a cursuary interest in the game (which Unravel and Phil failed to show, so it was pretty much just me Dad and Antonio).
Now I?m going to dispute that Q3 was really all that bad and this kinda reminds me of how I was attacked for asking people who?d they king in Kingmaker. Nobody, myself included, can guess people?s card based solely on that data point, could it provide a data point for me? I suppose, but I?d have to do a lot of fishing to get more, because I might be able to tell as scum if someone had a baron. Furthermore, THE QUESTION ENDED UP BEING USEFUL, because apparently Punchy would not have used the baron(or he didn?t read the N2 part of the that question, which could end up invalidating all of this paragraph). This is exactly the viewpoint that I was trying to reveal about card play, because if N2 comes along and it?s 2v1 with maf killing, you better be using that card on someone, which it looks like he wouldn?t do (also, D2 MYLO and D2 LYLO can effectively be the same thing because scum needs one mislynch to win and town has no way of gaining them back in this set up)
Also Dad, where are you getting that I?m slipping
I?m gonna have to read back in how all of you play, but I do have at least gut townleans on all who have posted
- - - Post Merge - - -
Also no