Auction Merengue is moving!

I know what you are saying, like i will not get her for 30 mill or something but i always find a villager i love, bid 200k, the rules DO say increases of 100k and then the next person bids 15 million or something, i find it unfair and strange that the host does not go with there rules :eek:

Typically it's minimum 100k so the prices aren't fluctuating by single bells
 
I know what you are saying, like i will not get her for 30 mill or something but i always find a villager i love, bid 200k, the rules DO say increases of 100k and then the next person bids 15 million or something, i find it unfair and strange that the host does not go with there rules :eek:

I also understand what you're saying. I never really see set increments, it's usually minimum increments that I see. Maybe just set a maximum increment or something. Like no one can bid more than 1 million more than the current high bid or something?
 
I also understand what you're saying. I never really see set increments, it's usually minimum increments that I see. Maybe just set a maximum increment or something. Like no one can bid more than 1 million more than the current high bid or something?

ok, sure :eek:

minimum increase- 100k
maximum increase-500k
 
Last edited:
I'm backing out of this lol it's gonna get ugly near the end lol

Nice thought by op and generous gesture- sorting the winner may be more difficult than expected
 
I know what you are saying, like i will not get her for 30 mill or something but i always find a villager i love, bid 200k, the rules DO say increases of 100k and then the next person bids 15 million or something, i find it unfair and strange that the host does not go with there rules :eek:

most of the auction threads say minimal increase which is why people bid more! I do like this method because it is fairer but at the same time it's still creating issues of overlapping prices :( it's probably going to get worse at the end though. :x
 
Back
Top