amanda1983
Senior Member
no i dont think it should be legal
so like... anybody know about that cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome or...
anyway, in terms of making it legal medicinally, why are non-medical field people even allowed to vote on that
then sometimes i wonder why people try to justify it by saying "well tobacco and alcohol are more harmful and are legal" because like ... do you guys not know that like,,, those two things are a huge part of the economy and like ... straight up banning them isn't gonna work too well since they're already a huge part of many people's lives It's not that simple
Yep I know about Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome. For anyone who doesn't, here's a (detailed) link :
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3576702/?report=classic
In Australia, non-medical people (aka the government) routinely make decisions on this and other issues on our behalf. They don't always (or even often) get things right, but that's our process nonetheless. They set policy on nuclear weapons, asylum seekers (where they notably fail again and again), environmental regulations, and any number of other issues they are not personally expert in. That's generally how democratic governments work, really.
In this particular case, the federal government listened to the experts themselves and it was *only* because of the push from our medical experts that medicinal cannabis use was legalised federally. Our Australian Medical Association (equivalent to the US AMA) published this in 2014 :
https://ama.com.au/ausmed/put-medicinal-cannabis-test-ama
From the article :
He said the introduction and use of cannabis for medicinal purposes was akin to the regulation and use of morphine.
A/Professor Owler said that, while morphine was used in medical application every day, it remained a controlled substance.
?We wouldn't dream of being without it. But we, of course, don't let it out on the street,? he said. ?We don't have people using it in an unregulated fashion, and I think we have to take some of the emotion out of this debate and look at marijuana or cannabis in exactly the same way.?
I won't copy+paste the rest but the reasons for legalising cannabis use in particular circumstances is clearly outlined - and that's just based on information to hand at that time.