Mafia TBT Mafia-Korean War (Cancelled)

well that's nice and everything, but between this post and the post where you FINALLY posted your case on minties (which was still a SHORT POST iirc only about 9-10 lines. that's hardly building a proper case, that's just posting the bare minimum) you must've posted at least another 5 or 6 times saying you were going to do it and you were just finding the posts. in fact you had to refind the posts at one point. why did you put it off for so long? it's not like you weren't active in the thread seeing as you posted a bunch in between where you said you were making a case for minties and the actual 'case'. i'm not sure if i buy into your vig claim either - whereas no-one has come forward and counterclaimed why would they since you could be lying and it would just put a target on their head too. and sataric, as somebody pointed out to me in the last game i played, it is possible that the mafia could have a list of the names to go with each role, so therefore i don't believe that the namedrop is enough to prove that his claim is legitimate.


I like to put things off until the last few hours or minutes that is why I didn't make it plus I forget things sometimes.

- - - Post Merge - - -

@Tui using meta is a good way of finding scum I use it a lot. Endless likes to try and control people sometimes.
 
Tui, am I to understand that you're defying my experience and claiming that meta is a good method of reading someone, while simultaneously claiming to retract your townread on me because of something that I do which is an integral part of my meta?

You can't have your cake and eat it too. I was townreading you up until this point but I'm starting to wonder if you're just playing crowds' favourite.

'another one of the reasons i listened to endless is because i was town-reading him at the time, but now it's been pointed out how controlling his behaviour seems to be i'll have to have another think when i go back through his posts and complete my reads after i finish this post.'.
nowhere do i mention a retraction of your town-read - i in fact haven't even completed a full read on you yet since i only got halfway down the list in the OP. i simply said that i'll do what i did with the half of the game that i read last night - and that's to go back through their posts to see if i notice anything or if i still stand by my initial lean when i read through the thread for the first couple of times, and in doing that i would notice if a very controlling stance is integral to your meta throughout and if so it wouldn't change my position.

and i wouldn't say that i 'defied' your experience - i originally did the exact opposite before a couple of other players pointed out the possibility of me being strung along through lack of my own experience.

I like to put things off until the last few hours or minutes that is why I didn't make it plus I forget things sometimes.

- - - Post Merge - - -

@Tui using meta is a good way of finding scum I use it a lot. Endless likes to try and control people sometimes.

but surely if you were looking to help town then you'd want to throw your thoughts into the pool as soon as you could? i can't remember you making a case in the previous game so i don't have anything to compare your timing to with this one.
 
'another one of the reasons i listened to endless is because i was town-reading him at the time, but now it's been pointed out how controlling his behaviour seems to be i'll have to have another think when i go back through his posts and complete my reads after i finish this post.'.
nowhere do i mention a retraction of your town-read - i in fact haven't even completed a full read on you yet since i only got halfway down the list in the OP. i simply said that i'll do what i did with the half of the game that i read last night - and that's to go back through their posts to see if i notice anything or if i still stand by my initial lean when i read through the thread for the first couple of times, and in doing that i would notice if a very controlling stance is integral to your meta throughout and if so it wouldn't change my position.

and i wouldn't say that i 'defied' your experience - i originally did the exact opposite before a couple of other players pointed out the possibility of me being strung along through lack of my own experience.



but surely if you were looking to help town then you'd want to throw your thoughts into the pool as soon as you could? i can't remember you making a case in the previous game so i don't have anything to compare your timing to with this one.

Cause I didn't live that long in the Newbie game if I did I would been making a case.
 
Cause I didn't live that long in the Newbie game if I did I would been making a case.

You weren't town in the newbie game though... LOL

- - - Post Merge - - -

As for my experience with Tardis as scum during Attack on Titan when he was mafia, I don't even think he made a case in that one. He said he was going to make a case on Entropy, but never followed through because it was "no longer needed" xD

- - - Post Merge - - -

I just find it very weird for tardis to say that he would have made a case, because he rarely has xD He likes to stay on the down low or only post reads that are really similar to others/have already been said xD

@Tui
Here's a link to the Attack on Titan game where his timing with Minties's explanation was pretty similar LOL Instead, this involved Wills ahaha xD
http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?370687-TBT-Mafia-Attack-on-Titan-Game-Over-Town-Wins&p=6615054&highlight=#post6615054
 
Tui, the sentence 'I was town reading him at that time' is exclusive of the current. And while that can be explained as needing to check up on my meta to re-affirm your townread, ever since the notion was passed that I was 'controlling', it's been mentioned by a lot of people that that isn't weird behaviour for me. In fact, it would be weird if I wasn't.
 
now i've got my hot drink i'll finish my reads. i realise some people consider this to be a risky thing to do at night but since we don't yet know how many mafia or hostile third-parties their are we don't know the number of people who will get killed tonight (although it's suspected to be pretty high) so i'd rather get my reads out there in case i do get killed and can't post them in the day.

first half of my reads are here for those concerned - oddly enough it's not appearing when you click my name to search my posts but i figure that that's just a forum glitch since it's still there.

endless - casting my personal upset aside endless did come in and break the ice with the introduction of the purple votes and the first set of RQS, something that a scum player or someone with something to hide wouldn't be inclined to do as it immediately put them under the spotlight. they've shared their thoughts on a couple of players though i'd really like to see more since a lot of their posts regard the acts of the blue roles (including straight off the bat with recommending the doc protect sataric due to his won - even though we don't know whether the stuff that can be acquired through the black market is worth a night's protection especially since the night is expected to be lethal) which could be either genuine concern or somebody trying to get blue roles to play into their hands. their posts are consistent in this though, and read very transparent and honest to me, so at the moment i'm erring to the former and hence have them at a slight town lean.

xine - xine hasn't posted a great deal yet but their post regarding their suspicions reads very transparently to me. yes - their main suspect was ashtot and it was ashtot who got lynched and flipped blue, but a) ashtot's posts raised the same suspicions with me and b) since this is a kingmaker (? is this the correct term) game, one player's suspicions don't really have a great impact, and most people cast their purple votes on oak and kirby anyway. they also explored all the outcomes regarding the doctor save discussion which shows to me that they're not holding anything back, so i'm very interested in seeing what other reads they have. slight town lean for now since i'd still like to hear a bit more from them.

tom - tom's post honestly confuse me so much i really can't read him at this point. they're either banter or very straight to the point (which i feel comes across as honest but i'd really like to see more of the reasoning behind some of their thoughts, for instance the 'him (daniel) or oak would be a good choice for lynch', which brief reasons were given for but not enough i feel to warrant trying to lead a lynch. i feel this is down to them just being busy outside of this game so i'm going to read them as null for now and come back later after i've seen a bit more.

entropy - i was slightly skeptic of them when ashtot and minties stated pretty early on that they trusted them based on how they got their reads right in previous games, but having seen more from entropy herself since i find her thoughts very clear and she's ruthless in calling other people out (in particular liamslash's post here which rubbed me right up the wrong way and that nobody else seemed to pick up on but since he responded with reasoning that i felt sufficient i didn't bring it up again). although minties mentioned that she tended to keep her reasoning to herself which isn't exactly a pro-town thing to do in my opinion i am not getting this feeling from her posts and i feel that her reads and views are very individual which is valuable to town so i'm reading town lean.

sataric - they were quick to admit their mistake with the initial debacle with the won which i feel that anyone who was trying to scam people wouldn't do in favour of pursuing their point in order to get what they want. however i did think that they were quick to buy into kirby's vig claim especially after you had him down as the most suspicious player and purple-voted him just five hours before you back-pedalled. this is strange play to me as a claim - especially without any added defense (i.e kirby just claimed his role and name and didn't really defend himself alongside that) wouldn't be enough to erase my suspicions of a player who otherwise i found to be very suspicious. you seem to put a lot of thought into the possible scenarios in the game which is why i'm surprised that you missed the possibility that mafia have been supplied with a list of names for each role in case they want to claim. i'd like to hear your defense on this but i'm currently reading you as a slight scum lean.

ness - please post more so i can actually gain an accurate read on you. their one post didn't raise any instant red flags to me and since i have nothing else to go off other than that i'll have to keep them as a null read for now although if they keep this up i imagine they'll be a candidate for a modkill or replacement.

liamslash - this post does not sit well with me atall
Speaking personally here, I have no idea why he town read me. I feel like if he town reads me he might have a reason or something, as, from as much as I can say, I haven't done anything. I just want to cover my back to say if he flips scum, I had nothing to do with him.

'i have no idea why he town read me' 'he might have a reason or something' 'i haven't done anything'; ALL of these statements point towards you being something other than town. why would you want to hear a particular reason for someone town-reading you if you were actually town? 'i haven't done anything' also implies that you intended to appear as something other than town. to me this is a huge slip so i'm scum leaning you for now.

esphas - i really want to see more from you though i understand if you're deliberately shying away from posting since you were mislynched on the basis of being active in the SU game. null read.

shiida - based on the SU game i can safely say that i don't think shiida is third-party since their play is completely different to when they were. the main difference being that they seem to be more active in contributing to pro-town discussion though i'd still like to hear more of their thoughts. slight town lean.

--------------------------------------------------
i'm sad to say that i'm a busy bee for pretty much the entirety of this weekend. tomorrow night my bf is staying over then the next morning we're going straight to a festival which lasts until sunday morning. i will be coming home saturday morning for a shower so depending on whether anybody comes back with me i might be able to post in detail, but otherwise it's sunday before i'll manage to post any new cases or in depth reads. i should still be able to answer any questions directed at me using my phone though hopefully.

- - - Post Merge - - -

Tui, the sentence 'I was town reading him at that time' is exclusive of the current. And while that can be explained as needing to check up on my meta to re-affirm your townread, ever since the notion was passed that I was 'controlling', it's been mentioned by a lot of people that that isn't weird behaviour for me. In fact, it would be weird if I wasn't.

i see how that line implies that i currently read you otherwise, my followup still implied that i read you as town and that my read wasn't swayed by the fact you were controlling if it appeared that way to me in your meta (which i said i would check once i finished my in depth read on you)

and @Crys
'crys - i find their posts odd at times, in particular this one:
i mean there's a chance anyone could be mafia but I don't think I'll see him contribute as I haven't even seen him post in the forum in awhile.

To whoever wants to answer or whatever idc; if you could have one person lynched or killed right now who would it be?

the first part was responding to miharu who asked why they were suspicious of blue pikachu (being that their original reasoning was just 'there is a chance he could be mafia') and their second response here is nearly as basic and really just points out the obvious. and the last half of this post seems to be fishing for people to pin lynches on which is a pretty scummy thing to do especially only 24 hours after the game has started and people are only just starting to get a feel for eachother's gameplay.'

this is my read on you from yesterday which i c/p'ed since it included a quote. you've probably seen it already but since you're asking for reads on you i figured there was a chance you hadn't.
 
What are you guys reads on me ;)

I really can't read you. But you are being more active so I'm null for you sorry I have been jumpy on reading you.

Townreads and leans

9. Tui - Tui's playstyle has reminded me of Steven Universe Mafia when they were town. Their confidence and tone in posts makes me believes they are town. They are questioning others, and analyzing peoples posts. One thing that left a bad taste in my mouth was how they complie with Endless when he said not to use meta.
16. Xine - My gut and your meta say youre town. Although only one poost has been made I like how she was able to analyse ashtots posts and use his meta to read him.
7. KirbyStarShip - Playing how they usually do with small posts. No offense but I see him more as bad town that the scum team and other players are piling up on.
5. Miharu - Like all of other town games, miharu has been able to question oothers, put logic into posts and analyse other players, without the usual questions. Using meta of past games, shes town.
3. Crys

Null
4. Call me Daniel
6. oak
11. Aronthaer
12. Blu Rose
13. Minties
14. Jacob
16. Xine
18. Entropy
19. Sataric
20. Ness
21. Liamslash
22. Esphas


Wya??
17. Tom
10. inkling
1. Ashtot
2. Byuntae



Scumreads and leans
23. Shiida - Ultimate fence sitting. This post also shows it. She says that "if i had to vote right i would probably vote for tardis, but honestly i dont think what hes done is completely enough to label him as scum and suggest a lynch on him. its enough for him to get noticed at best, but again, not deserving of a lynch." She doesn't think tardis deserves a lynch and doesnt want to neccesarily label him as mafia. She then goes on after that and says that scum is in the experienced players after what was said and the kirby vote. Next with this They say inexperienced and experienced, the whole playerlist, this isnt adding anything to the table. Nice fence sitting and back pedaling.


15. Endless - This is a small sus atm but I don't like being told what to do yo... and i dont think other players like the controlling behaviour either.

8. Bluepikachu47 - I have been sus of you since yesterday with your reaction to entropys post, my reaction test and how you 'read' the thread and is only sus of one person and have no town reads or anything to comment on.


##Vote: Shiida


- - - Post Merge - - -

Shiida

Why put Xine as null if your gut feeling says she is town?
 
i'm going to address these together since i'm pretty hurt by what has happened (lol). i personally did think meta had a large part in reading somebody hence i based part of my suspicions of kirby on his meta - which by the way, is the EXACT same as when he was scum - so i wasn't exactly going to ignore this in my read since it was raising so many red flags. i've only played one game with only a small handful of the players here and so far i've discovered that the benefits of playing mafia within a small group of people is that you get to know people's playstyles and that betters your judgement and reads. but when a more experienced player comes along and basically says 'no don't do that' it's understandable that it made me think twice since i'm still sitting here and learning the ropes of this game as a whole, so now i'm left feeling like a bit of a guillable idiot.

don't feel gullible or anything like that, you're playing way better than some people that have way more experience than u do lol

don't let anyone intimidate you, especially if they're trying to change your opinion. i wish someone would've told me that when i started playing tbh
 
I really can't read you. But you are being more active so I'm null for you sorry I have been jumpy on reading you.



Why put Xine as null if your gut feeling says she is town?
Oops but xine is supposed to be in town.
 
Tui, am I to understand that you're defying my experience and claiming that meta is a good method of reading someone, while simultaneously claiming to retract your townread on me because of something that I do which is an integral part of my meta?

You can't have your cake and eat it too. I was townreading you up until this point but I'm starting to wonder if you're just playing crowds' favourite.

you can't act like everything you believe is the only answer

you scumread hayden, correct? and i scumread him early on d1 for a change in meta. nothing besides that. i applied pressure on him and then it led to him doing other scummy things. which you later scumread him for, do you think that makes my read wrong and yours right?

nobody's saying meta is the be all and end all, which is the point you're trying to make for some reason. i don't like this post at all, and how you're trying to use appeal to authority. literally nobody should buy into this, and i didn't really expect something that illogical from you. nor did i expect the ad hominem towards xine
 
that moment when you just realize that Kirby is Tardis

I feel like an idiot lmao
 
tom - tom's post honestly confuse me so much i really can't read him at this point. they're either banter or very straight to the point (which i feel comes across as honest but i'd really like to see more of the reasoning behind some of their thoughts, for instance the 'him (daniel) or oak would be a good choice for lynch', which brief reasons were given for but not enough i feel to warrant trying to lead a lynch. i feel this is down to them just being busy outside of this game so i'm going to read them as null for now and come back later after i've seen a bit more.
Pretending there's good reasons to lynch someone Day 1 in a game where we officially have no vote is quite silly. Either we policy lynch players who rub us wrong or we lynch the talker and see who piled on the bandwagon. But since the vote is out of our control, it matters not what happens.
 
Pretending there's good reasons to lynch someone Day 1 in a game where we officially have no vote is quite silly. Either we policy lynch players who rub us wrong or we lynch the talker and see who piled on the bandwagon. But since the vote is out of our control, it matters not what happens.

I dont agree, you're acting like finding scum is impossible d1 when it's not. I'm not against policy lynches but there's usually a lot better reasons to lynch someone

so ru lethal or non lethal 3rd party?
 
I dont agree, you're acting like finding scum is impossible d1 when it's not. I'm not against policy lynches but there's usually a lot better reasons to lynch someone

so ru lethal or non lethal 3rd party?

It's not impossible, but it's usually unlikely. That said whoever dear leader is clearly doesn't agree with the rest of us because I really do think that had we nailed Oak or Daniel D1 KP would be knocked down a peg.

you first :^)
 
It's not impossible, but it's usually unlikely. That said whoever dear leader is clearly doesn't agree with the rest of us because I really do think that had we nailed Oak or Daniel D1 KP would be knocked down a peg.

you first :^)

it's as likely as you make it to be, though

i'm armed 'n dangerous, wbu?
 
Back
Top