Endless
Smugly egotistical
I am, as a mafia player, incredibly fond of occam's razor, which is a belief that advises the selection of the simplest explanation when it's difficult to determine between that and other hypothesised explanations.
In this scenario, I find it quite difficult determine whether or not you were flipping off qwertie because he was your mafia buddy or not, and I believe the simplest explanation is that you did in fact flip off due to that reason. (And I'm not saying this because I haven't read your reasoning for flipping off, I'm saying it because I don't think your reasoning is all that strong.)
Of course, this means that I'm presently reading that facet as a scumtell. I don't think solely scumreading you off that is at all fair, because it's a minor tell if anything. I found your first post off, which I'll need to follow up on.
What you should be doing right now is providing your thoughts regarding other people - I'm not saying this to be condescending, or otherwise rude or to imply that you haven't done quite a bit of this in thread, just that your last 3 posts have been solely with regard to the push on you. The best defense is a good offense, as they say. If you're town, then there's quite a good chance that I and others will townread you off your play. But if you accidentally curl into a defensive ball (and I'm not saying that you are, I'm just cautioning against the possibility) then that's no beuno for both you and us.
My goal is and always has been to progress meaningful content, so what I'd tentatively request from you now Kat (and I realise this might seem a little counter productive, but bear with me) is to ignore the pushes on you with regard to the vote flip, and to just to provide content like you would regularly as an unpressured player. The reasoning for this is that you've provided your reasoning for what you did, and there's nothing really to be gained from presenting any more argument from your side in the matter. I'm likely to encourage other people to provide their opinion on the matter, but it's important that this shouldn't elicit a response or defense from you, otherwise you'll get locked in a cycle of defense and that'll hamper your other content. (Which is usually quite good) I've been in this scenario myself before, and it's grisly.
My read on you is, of course, subject to change, once I get the time to properly ISO you. You've got a lot of content - and that's a good thing.
In this scenario, I find it quite difficult determine whether or not you were flipping off qwertie because he was your mafia buddy or not, and I believe the simplest explanation is that you did in fact flip off due to that reason. (And I'm not saying this because I haven't read your reasoning for flipping off, I'm saying it because I don't think your reasoning is all that strong.)
Of course, this means that I'm presently reading that facet as a scumtell. I don't think solely scumreading you off that is at all fair, because it's a minor tell if anything. I found your first post off, which I'll need to follow up on.
What you should be doing right now is providing your thoughts regarding other people - I'm not saying this to be condescending, or otherwise rude or to imply that you haven't done quite a bit of this in thread, just that your last 3 posts have been solely with regard to the push on you. The best defense is a good offense, as they say. If you're town, then there's quite a good chance that I and others will townread you off your play. But if you accidentally curl into a defensive ball (and I'm not saying that you are, I'm just cautioning against the possibility) then that's no beuno for both you and us.
My goal is and always has been to progress meaningful content, so what I'd tentatively request from you now Kat (and I realise this might seem a little counter productive, but bear with me) is to ignore the pushes on you with regard to the vote flip, and to just to provide content like you would regularly as an unpressured player. The reasoning for this is that you've provided your reasoning for what you did, and there's nothing really to be gained from presenting any more argument from your side in the matter. I'm likely to encourage other people to provide their opinion on the matter, but it's important that this shouldn't elicit a response or defense from you, otherwise you'll get locked in a cycle of defense and that'll hamper your other content. (Which is usually quite good) I've been in this scenario myself before, and it's grisly.
My read on you is, of course, subject to change, once I get the time to properly ISO you. You've got a lot of content - and that's a good thing.
