Why Minties/Monroe/Salties is wrong and quite possible third party
Minties really likes to work in hypothetical scenarios. Essentially - nearly all of Minties' posts just take the assumption that I am
third party (or whenever it's convenient to her posts, I'm actually
mafia), and never considers the position of my posts if she assumed I was town. This is something the great
Karla often worked to try to correct in many players' posts over the old mafia days but it seems
Minties never grasped it.
Here are the points
Minties has on me, and I'll number them for formatting sake.
1.
Minties thinks my RQS post is stupid and I'm trying to act pro-town.
2. I jumped on
Beardo after
SarasaKat's reaction test.
3. I voted for
doughssant right after D2 started instead of including
Beardo in my suspicion list, even though
Beardo was dead and I used references to
Beardo in my case anyway to help show why I think the 3 are scum. (point 3 is pretty much entirely null)
4. I posted that I thought
Ness was mafia on D1 but I didn't switch my vote over to him (I love this one a lot)
5. I'm defending myself against
Minties' posts on me.
POINT 1
Relevant Quote from Minties:
Why Trundle/BeaverMan is Third Party
A paper by Minties Mintington
s.n.i.p
General overview and trying very hard to appear super pro town. These question things tend to be highly unhelpful and the answer to number 3 sticks out to me. I feel like this entire game so far, he has basically shoved how "town" he is in our faces when questioned. Almost to the point of being desperate to prove that he's town because he's not. Now onto where he picked a response to his stupid questions:
-
Minties thinks I'm trying to act super pro-town in my posts. I must admit, I was quite excited to play this game and I actually was just trying to show my enthusiasm, but
Minties assumes that I am speaking from a third party standpoint and I'm just trying to shout out "Hey everyone! I'm town, not third party! Because that would mean you'd have to kill me!", which I have rarely ever done as
mafia or
third party before, AFAIK.
- If my RQS is so bad, why is
Minties using my answer to my own RQS to show I'm
third party? Obviously, if you are correct about me, then my RQS was effective. If you are wrong about me, my RQS is ineffective, which means point 1 is no longer a relevant point.
POINT 2
Relevant Quote from Minties:
He literally sussed out Beardo for their response to the third question because they stated confusion at Kat jumping their ass for nothing (Kat didn't even have a case, it was clearly a reaction test). New players WOULD be confused if someone just jumped on them for no reason? I feel like this was a completely terrible reason to actually vote and KEEP HIS VOTE on Beardo. Later on he goes to say:
- My vote and post on
Beardo was pretty bad, I admit. It was Day 1 and nothing else had happened yet. But I saw
SarasaKat's reaction test, read her as town, and figured I'd follow along.
- After
Ness was lynched, I didn't really have much to post. I just wanted everyone to make sure I still thought
Beardo was scum, and I ended up wrong (woo hoo no surprise). The reason I thought
Beardo was scum was just because I thought their reaction to mine and
Sarasa's votes on her seemed fishy to me. To be fair,
Beardo has not played in a long time, and even when she played, she didn't play much.
- Overall, point 2 can be read as me trying to go after a noob as
third party, but it's perfectly reasonable as
town players make mistakes too.
Point 2 is still relevant, but it would be reasonable for me to push Beardo from any alignment.
POINT 3
Relevant Quote from Minties:
THAT HE IS STILL PUSHING FOR BEARDO, YET HE VOTED FOR DOUGHSSANT AND DID NOT INCLUDE BEARDO IN HIS SUS LIST AT ALL.[/SIZE][/B][/U] He also claimed to have sent in a kill, but then later recanted it, which most people missed. Why is that something of concern? Because he did send in a kill because he IS third party. Here is Trundle's "reads" posts where he completely neglects to mention Beardo even though he said he was still pushing a lynch on Beardo:
- This point is completely irrelevant. I didn't include
Beardo in my D2 sus list because
Beardo was dead.
- Regardless I used
Beardo's death in my push for
doughssant in his scum reads list anyway.
Point 3 is completely null.
POINT 4
Relevant Quote from Minties:
Saying he felt there was a strong chance that Ness was mafia, yet he did not remove his vote on Beardo even though there was evidence on Ness and nothing on Beardo. He esentially goes on to actually AGREE with Ness' case on Daniel when it was clear at that point that Ness was trying to paint Daniel in a bad light to save his own ass:
- Haha well,
Minties. Here is a huge flaw, again. You are arguing I am
third party, but then you bring up this point.
- If I was
third party, there is no way I would be able to know whether or not
Ness was
mafia. So
Minties is suddenly suggesting I am
mafia just because it fits this point in her case. The flip flop and you grasping at points here is pretttty pathetic.
-
Ness was already easily on the path to being lynched at that point anyway, so it didn't matter if I voted for him or not. My vote was irrelevant at that point.
- I didn't think day ended so soon, and as Thursday is my busy day. I didn't have as much time to read through as I had hoped, only time to make a few off posts.
Point 4 is irrelevant. Mainly because
Minties is arguing I'm
third party, and also because
Ness was set to be lynched regardless of my vote. If I was
mafia, shouldn't I have voted him anyway to make myself seem more
town?
POINT 5
- I mean, the rest of this is just that I'm defending myself from her posts. I have already stated that any of my behavior as town or scum can be attributed to any behavior from any game, and my recent scum games have actually been quite different from what
Minties has mentioned against me. If you think my scum playstyle is scummy because (insert game here), I can show you a scum game where my behavior completely contradicts it.
- Would you rather I don't defend myself from your posts? Or defending myself by saying "well, I might be scum, I might not be, but please don't lynch me". I am obviously going to heavily push the fact that I am town if I want to avoid being lynched.
Conclusion:
Point 1 is mostly irrelevant (it sucked anyway).
Point 2 is valid but doesn't take into account the hypothetical scenarios where I'm town, mafia, and third party - only that I'm third party, so it is very weak.
Point 3 is completely irrelevant.
Point 4 is mostly irrelevant unless Minties wants to say I'm now
mafia rather than
third party.
Point 5 is literally just getting mad at me for defending myself. It doesn't make much sense.
Minties is wrong. To me, it seems like she is just trying to push me as hard as possible to get me out of the game like she did in the last game where I was town. I think
Minties herself could be
mafia, which is why she was pushing me as
third party rather than
mafia. There seems to be no reason for her to push me as
third party rather than
mafia when it makes more sense for her case for me to be mafia unless she herself is
mafia and is trying to get rid of the other team. Salty that your scum buddy
Ness died so early, Monroe?
Let's not forget to mention that you yourself,
Minties, did not even vote for
Ness yesterday. You voted for
Lucanosa for no reason other than because he posted a placeholder after people were posting reads, and you put is that you "would be satisfied" with a
Lucanosa lynch. Even when you posted about
Ness in post #508 you refrained from taking making a position on him. You just spouted out information about him that didn't really make it clear what you were trying to say. I'm going to post this for now and follow it up later but oh my, there is more.
- - - Post Merge - - -
oh also my title is supposed to say why she is quite possible mafia, not third party, my bad