I'm placing a vote down for Dolby after going through his filter.
This is the first post he made that caught my attention. This is a perfect post from the perspective of a scum Dolby who knows Ryan and I are innocent. He analyses the situation with the mentality that one of us is scum, but doesn't commit to a position. I take a pretty dim view of any experienced player that seriously entertained the idea that I was a killblocked scum. I note that he doesn't find that possibility unusual, yet he labels the possibility that scum sent ryan out on a high risk mission to frame me as unlikely.
It merely didn't occur to me that both of you could have been telling the truth. As for thinking that it was possible that Ryan killblocked scum, it's merely because I've never played a game with a potentially town roleblocker before. I also doubt that scum would risk one of their own to get just own particular player out of the game intentionally(such as, for example, claiming town roleblocker in a closed set-up)
This post puts me off as well. Mentioning that SP is playing strangely, then conceding that it's common for him? Fenced. Saying that using the Yui=mark=scum argument is scummy, when his suspicions against me and Ryan were just as weak.
SP does play strangely all the time but he has never made seemingly noob arguments, that's what pushed me over, as for his suspicions against you and Ryan, I counted that as merely SP's usual strange behavior
Jellofish is an easy target.
I'm an easy target as well, and guess what. Jellofish just voted for me without explaining
I don't understand this post. Why would you need a defense?
Ashtot made a big accusatory post against me
Crystal is another easy target. Honestly, some of the same reasons you use for voting Crystal I could apply to you as well. Such as pushing already suspected players while bringing up nothing new.
Well, this is actually I pretty good game contribution-wise for me, I suppose that I could appear to be trying to blend in, but I did present a defense to Ashtot
tldr:
You are targetting easy players without your own developed reasons.
You have previously targeted people already under suspicion, again without your own developed reasons.
You're coasting by on other people's suspicions, on people that so far have been proven innocent.
Well let's see, I admit I bandwagoned onto SP without my own original suspicions, but so did 6 other people at least,
I created my own reasons for oath (with some poor word choices), and I created my own case on Jellofish
Really, I developed a my own view and reasoning on oath, who was innocent, however, using Dad's post as a structural point, so that's somewhat exaggerated, and a lot of people bandwagoned onto SP for the same reason (like nine other people), while he never produced a defense
##Vote: Dolby
