I could always go into more detail about it later, but my suspicion comes from something people do as mafia a lot, and what I would do as mafia when I was new to the game: post things that seem helpful/analytical like a big scenario rather than actually trying to pick apart people's interactions or making a case - when you make a nice big post of a scenario you look like you're active and pro-town when in reality you're using it to coast. But that's just my read, really.
I'm curious as to why you still have the stance you do on Forek, I thought you were reaction testing with him. The owner being miller makes sense because Tina likes to make stories out of the roles and I have a feeling the owner being framed for something is a part of the game's story - that's something I'd expect from Tina.
I stopped reaction testing him and committed a while back, and that description about why the owner would be the miller rings true. This is one of those cases where I can
see the entire counter argument and
see why I'd be wrong and what I'd done wrong to get the wrong read but where if I
do back off and he turns out to be red I'll never forgive myself. His play is erratic and contradictory and his pushes are spontaneous and wacky and I'm not entirely sure if I can justify unvoting him. (He's also really self concious and defensive, which is typical coming from mafia.)
Luckily, crunch time is delayed for 24 hours so I have more time to tackle this dilemma.
Forek, why claim villager over miller? (Your actual role) What's the benefit you get from hiding that you're miller?
Also @Dad point conceded on pillow bunny, but I don't agree with it.
Just ISO'd pillow bunny and I'm going to need a clarification, they stated in
one of their posts that the difference between me-red/Forek-town and me-town/Forek-town was 'basically indistinguishable' yet is now pushing me in favour of the large Forek wagon. This makes absolutely no sense because either a) you think Forek is town and my alignment is therefore 'indistinguishable' or b) you think Forek is red and you'd go along with that wagon over trying to push your own individual wagon on me. And yeah, I read over your later post but I'm starting to doubt that the egregious errors in it weren't merely misinterpreting data (My votes, my reaction push on you) but you actually misconstruing things.
Pre-post edit: what happened to the terrible logic for townreading me
here? Glad I re-read over pillow, I'd almost marked off Dad's read as 'decent but incorrect'.
Forek has ironically had consistent inconsistencies, you on the other hand were very consistent last game and the mis-match between your first sort of content post and your second content post is way out of place. I'm not going to move my vote yet but tomorrow is another story, as much as I hate to do what whoever said I was likely to make a last second switch off Forek predicted I'd do.
Pre-post edit: You know what? I'm going to bite the bullet. I know I said I'd never forgive myself if Forek is actually red and I'd back off for now but at this rate I'm going to forgive myself even less if he isn't and I don't - especially when a better candidate presents itself. The last one I caught on pre-post edit tips the scales. Here we go boys, we're in for a ride, let's pivot to
pillow bunny.
That wasn't spontaneous either, I've been thinking over Forek for a couple of hours and while I haven't been thinking on pillow that long, a brief skim of their content last game provides a stark difference. They were ten times more hesitant last game. Well, their entire play last game was tentative. And while people are often less nervous on their second game, I don't think that scales this hard - or even comes close. Once again, unto the breach.
And with that, I'm off to bed. Let the harp play it's beautiful tunes while I'm out, I'm going to enjoy the carnage it leaves behind.