Mafia The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild Mafia: Endgame MAFIA WINS
- Thread starter toadsworthy
- Start date
amazonevan19
DLELELEWOOOOP
I'd love for dolby to explain why me agreeing with dad is a contradiction, when my reads of Karen and Zendel are both null because there is not enough information to go either way. With aron, though, I feel their continued explaining away is something potentially significant. How that is contradictory with my other stances is very unclear.
Aronthaer
Back from Hiatus (3/18/22)
Quick question: what is the point of asking specifically one person, Zendel, what they think instead of asking the whole group? that seems odd considering you have no idea what their alignment is.
No, it's not you agreeing with Dad that's the contradiction, it's your turnaround on Zendal
nah dude i don't think i can pull this style off as scum but idk maybe we'll see in a future game
- - - Post Merge - - -
why did no one ask me a question
someone ask me a question
It kinda reminds me of this one time when someone asked a user named Corrie a question, I think, specifically instead of the entire group.
Btw, that got you bluesniped
amazonevan19
DLELELEWOOOOP
Isolating a question to one person can be used to help establish causation (for example, Zendel is maf, so he will townlean someone who's town to make himself look town, or townlean a buddy, or scumread a townie to try and kill them off or scumlean a buddy for bussing. Once zendel flips, we can go back to his old posts and try and establish links between him and other players). Anyone is free to discuss whatever interactions they want, and idk dad's exact motivations for asking zendel alone that question, but speaking for myself I like to probe specific people to reaction test, get them to potentially slip, or hear a new perspective on something.
Aronthaer
Back from Hiatus (3/18/22)
Yeah I guess that makes sense, to be honest. I'm not the most experienced player and I didn't really think of how that question would kinda single out a maf based on their answer. thanks for the explanation.
at the time it seemed weird to me because it sounded like he was looking for validation from one member with an unknown alliance instead of asking the group what their thoughts were. but that makes a lot of sense actually.
Damniel
Openly Wolfing
Yes
I think Dolby reads too deeply about every single post all the time so u should chillax
I'm not sure how people think **** posting is alignment telling. You can joke around town or mafia, it just comes down to whether it's too distracting or that's all the person does. But for beginning of d1 it's expected
amazonevan19
DLELELEWOOOOP
it's worth noting that both dad and dolby have dinged me on my supposed "turnaround" on zendel. Potential team there.
I explained to dad, but I'll explain again: I wanted to toss out that thought and hear from people (preferably Zendel himself) on his behavior in a prior game. I didn't scumread him for it. Yeah I wanted it to be given some weight in case he was maf in that game, but it's not a good scumtell. Just trying to collect info and piece together the puzzle. I never flipped on zendel. I never said "oh I think he's scum, whoops I was wrong now he's town." He has been and remains null in my eyes.
Why do recent events push your sus on Evan higher? Evan isn't piggybacking on me since he posted this in response to Aronthaer making what can appear as a jokeish 'please don't lynch me over that' smalltext line in regards to how their rqs was a large post full of useless stuff:
##VOTE: Aronthaer
Kappa
- - - Post Merge - - -
also since you didn't answer RQ 4 that confirms you're SK
So even though I was the first person to give a fuller read on Aron's constant excuses, I'm giving Evan credit here that he did indeed sorta note it. Also, I've been getting some reaction out of him by accusing him of backtracking and his response, a quickly posted reaction, was anger before anything:
Particularly seeing the anger in the italicized 'not' here. This is a common behavioral reaction of an honest person being accused of something: they quickly explain or clarify what they previously stated and an instinctual anger arises from the fact that they know they're being honest about something and somebody is threatening that honesty.
So if anything, I townread Evan in these recent events. And in fact I think it looks good for him and I like that my one on one exchange with him has led to this small case against him coming from you.
Yeah, that's why I noted that Evan was addressing him somewhere.
If you don't see that as a response then I don't know what to tell you. You can't say that writing a paragraph responding specifically to that point isn't an up-in-arms reaction.
I said I wanted a response from what game it was. Hence why I said "When was that"?
He has responded to that clarifying that he got mixed up.
Adding more scumlean points for Aronthaer's defense being an attempted read at me for just focusing on asking one person.
I was actually having a personal exchange with Zendel about being a good player and not letting their emotions get to them, which is what also happened when they hosted, and so that's why after they said they felt there was nothing to look into yet, I asked them what they thought of you after I pointed out that you have been making excuses all game.
- - - Post Merge - - -
And of course I wouldn't want just one person to look into Aron. When I make a post, I make a post hoping that everyone in the game will read it.
