~The Novelty Pokedex Completers~

Nigel said:
Jasonnman said:
Oh yes!,i came up with an awesome idea when i was at my martial arts class yesterday so here it is.

Name of Novelty: Brucelee
Recolour/Edit/Fakemon/etc.:Edit
Pokedex entry: Hitmonlee
Comments (optional)This hitmonlee learnt the ways of kung-fu from a martial arts champion and began to look and dress like him ever since he passed away.

BruceLee.png
Hitmonlee is actually named after Bruce Lee, and Hitmonchan after Jackie Chan.
yeah, the weird thing is that they got it right with hitmonlee as Bruce lee because he kicks
but with hitmonchan we'll hes a boxer and Jackie chan inst a boxer hes a martial artist so...

EPIC FAIL WITH HITMONCHAN
 
Jake. said:
Don't mean to be rude, but after and including Auxhillary, they all suck. Except Bubble Gum Ganger, and some are doubles which suck even more, 'cause we're not really "completing" the dex, we're jsut adding more forms to already-made novelties.
So? There were doubles in the actual pok
 
Fossil Tyraniter
Fossil-Tyranitar.png


I figured since the exeggutor wasn't cracked, Tyranitar didn't need to be either.
 
Still don't see what's wrong with splicing. I really didn't, I just literally used it as a base in the way that I copied the seeing and edited it to fit my liking.
 
Bacon Boy said:
Still don't see what's wrong with splicing. I really didn't, I just literally used it as a base in the way that I copied the seeing and edited it to fit my liking.
Because it's a novelty creation group, not a splicing group.
 
Jake. said:
Bacon Boy said:
Still don't see what's wrong with splicing. I really didn't, I just literally used it as a base in the way that I copied the seeing and edited it to fit my liking.
Because it's a novelty creation group, not a splicing group.
Why can't splices be novelties?
 
Because a novelty is a unique edited Pokemon. Not a splice of another pokemon, simple as that.
 
Bacon Boy said:
But a splice IS a unique edit of a pokemon or two.
Bottom line is. A splice is not a novelty. End of story.
 
Jake. said:
Bacon Boy said:
But a splice IS a unique edit of a pokemon or two.
Bottom line is. A splice is not a novelty. End of story.
Bottom line is your not giving me hard facts that support your statement. A splice fits unto your definition of a novelty. It's a unique edit of a pokemon.
 
Bacon Boy said:
Jake. said:
Bacon Boy said:
But a splice IS a unique edit of a pokemon or two.
Bottom line is. A splice is not a novelty. End of story.
Bottom line is your not giving me hard facts that support your statement. A splice fits unto your definition of a novelty. It's a unique edit of a pokemon.
Yeah, but a splice isn't very creative whilst a novelty takes time to think about what edits to make. Thinking about splices is very easy since you just take two or more Pokemon and mash them into one. Thinking about a novelty is more difficult since you've got to figure out which themes to fit a Pokemon. No splices, end of story. Any more arguments and there shall be more trouble.
 
Well I take offense to that because splicing is not easy. You have to e creative because you have to take the time to see what fits and what doesn't. You don't just mash tem together. You also have to recoloe and most of the time edit. I could say the same thing about some of your novelties then as well for a lack if creativity.
 
Back
Top