The Villager Giveaway Thread!

[Zura]

A raffle seems more fair than first come first serve...

I Disagree with this!

 

[MamaMyers]

Muffy my auto correct does not like that name lol

 

[Wychglade]

Alli the alligator moving on the 15th if anyone wants her?

 

[Lellyna]

Looking for villagers in my signature

 

[billthejockduck]

I Disagree with this!

I agree! First come first serve is fair, because you're first. In a raffle, it's completely random to the users.

 

[Zura]

I agree! First come first serve is fair, because you're first. In a raffle, it's completely random to the users.

See someone agrees!

 

[jakeypride]

I agree! First come first serve is fair, because you're first. In a raffle, it's completely random to the users.

First come first serve is way more fair.

 

[fuzzy3]

Well... Random, in this case, means everyone who wants him has an equal probability of getting him. You don't have to just be lucky and happen to see someone offering a villager.

Any anyway, the villager in question was going to be auctioned or raffled, so first come first serve wasn't even on the table.

 

[MamaMyers]

First come first serve is way more fair.

I agree that's what I'm doing with the rest if mine I give away

 

[Zura]

First come first serve is way more fair.

I agree! First come first serve is fair, because you're first. In a raffle, it's completely random to the users.

First come first served is way more fair than a raffle!

 

[MyLifeIsCake]

I agree! First come first serve is fair, because you're first. In a raffle, it's completely random to the users.

A raffle gives everyone a fair chance. If someone claimed him right before you got there or if you were offline there would be disappointment. At least in a raffle you knew you had a fair shot >>---> ((o)) <---<< [arrows]

Eh... But it's not my raffle... :/

 

[jakeypride]

I MISSED ROSIE </3 OH WELL.

 

[-strawberry]

how is first come first serve more fair? a raffle gives everyone an equal chance of getting that villager, while first come first served... doesn't. it's just convenient and fast, not necessarily "more fair". at least imo.

 

[Samicakes]

I Disagree with this!

Same, lol

 

[Axeler137]

I don't care what you guys say, I feel that a raffle is the best option for giving away someone like Zucker. I could just auction him away, or just keep him, but I decided to give him away. Raffles are much more easier to handle.

 

[billthejockduck]

I feel that people want it first come first serve is because they're going to refresh the page every so often to get a chance to win him. I'm part of this actually. XD

 

[MyLifeIsCake]

No more arguments >.< Whoever is trading gets to choose how a villager is given away~



I just think raffles are more fun! (My two cents...)

 

[MorsMortie]

If anyone's giving away anything, be thankful they're doing it and don't make a fuss over how they give it away. It's free! If you don't like the conditions of getting it for free, then don't get it for free. :/

 

[Teacup]

Pekoe's moving! Anyone want her? c:
(Preferably if she's a dreamie of yours~)

 

[Gizmodo]

Raffles are way better
Some people cant just refresh the page constantly for a villager, and theres no way of gaging if the person has a full interest, atleast in a raffle people have an interest to even enter