I'll admit that Clinton has the most potential to do good, but she also has the potential to do evil. As I said previously, Trump isn't likely to get done what he wants but Clinton is. Sure, she'll probably put some good things into place, but at what cost? I have to admit that I am not a fan of huge corporations and their interests, but Clinton is going to conform to those interests since those are the ones who are paying her the most.
She can come up with cute ideas here and there, but ultimately, will it really help the average American or ravage them with taxes and fees when they are unable to comply due to xyz circumstances?
I think Trump is the better of the two, simply because he won't be able to actually do much of what he says he wants to do in his first year of office. We can take 4 years to try to get some GOOD choices while he does next to nothing.