Mafia Xenoblade Chronicles Mafia-Endgame
- Thread starter Damniel
- Start date
So Tardis buddy wanna claim now
Kirbystarship
Senior Member
Still need to post reads Cory, Tardis, & Hayden, and analyze Dolby's reads and apply them to mine. But I got home too late from work. Also, I realize that Tina and Ares just died but I spent ****ing too long on this to just delete it so I do not even care. I am posting this in its entirety. Disclaimer: It is also quite unedited because half of it was rushed so forgive my non-eloquence.
I will finish this up tonight and I expect responses from people that I am addressing.
I am certain scum is within the Inkling bandwagon. However, I do not think mafia would be so bold as to lead the lynch, so I have a slight town lean on Cadbbury considering they also mentioned Inkling as scummy the previous day. I also do not think that the entire scum team is on Inkling?s bandwagon, because that is very short-sighted.
Inkling (9)
Cadbbury
Mother of all Llamas
Cory
Tardis2016
PandaDarling
Nightmares
*Tina (1)
Ashtot
Cory
Very likely scum:
Mother of all Llamas:
Textbook Grade F bandwagoning, coasted through the game, matching exactly with their mafia meta that posts the minimum requirement as to not be modkilled.
Attempting to justify their bandwagon on Ares. But there were PLENTY of others that had ?confident? answers to the RQS, including even Dolby- so it is blindly apparent they are trying to come up with anything to jump on the easy lynch. Over confident and forced are strange words to put together: if anything, THAT sentence is what feels forced. Considering you have no actual reasoning
I actually laughed at that second line, because it is truly hilarious and beyond hypocritical. You are the one that is trying to blend in with the others, you are the one jumping on bandwagons without your own reasoning. Not once have you formed your own opinions on someone that was not influenced by everyone else that was bandwagoning them. There is no way that town would do this. You also did not even bother to try to explain your opinion on Tina, you are just throwing out random **** and attempting to see what sticks.
Of course, does neither of those things.
Top kek.
All I hear is ?baaaaaaaaa"
Yet again, jumping in on one of the bandwagons very late into Day phase, only a few hours before voting ends.
YOU ARE THE ONE THAT IS SHEEPING. Literally name one of your votes all game that has not been sheeping others reads? You have not posted in depth reads the entire game. You are the one that is perfectly matching your scum meta, you are the one pushing for the easy lynch by voting Ares on D1. Indecisiveness is not even scummy, in fact usually it indicates not knowing what to do- which is typically actually more town behavior than scum. Scum is known to flip flop, but Cadberry was explaining why throughout each and every one of their votes. You have said nothing but trying to disguise the fact that you are
And finally, what I believe is one of the scummiest things anyone has said during the entire game: asking third party if they would side with the mafia. I literally tried to figure out what town-sided motivation anyone would ever have to ask this question, and the only answer would be if it was one of their first few games. However, Mother of all Llamas is not new to the game. OF COURSE he would if it met meeting his win condition sooner, that is literally his job in the game and town needs to lynch mafia not him so this question is just an attempt at extending an olive branch to Tom for the future.
There would be no reason to ask this question if you are really town. If you cannot provide actual reasoning why this question felt like it was something important for you to ask, you are almost definitely scum.
Leaning scum:
Tina:
I refrained from reading them in hopes that their post quality would pick up. Let?s just say I am let down.
There is nothing wrong with this exactly, but then they do not contribute before Day ends. Were you setting up your excuse in advance in case there was a mislynch? Oh, but you had time to post a one-liner at night?
Why do you feel the need to constantly excuse yourself?
Now onto the shiny part we had all been waiting for. I commend you for your organization and use of color, it almost made me overlook the fact that the majority of your reads have little substance.
Notice how they?re almost entirely scumreads: town reading only four people, scum reading 12, null reading 2. What really is disturbing about these reads is that the most expanded ones are on their TOWNREADS. The longest read in the entire post in on Nightmares, who is their townread. This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Basically you are just trying to give us a wall of text so it looks like what you are saying is contributing when in reality, you have given us nothing.
If you are leaning interpreting something as a joke then why is that grounds to include in your post??
If you didn?t isolate someones post when you are reading them what did you do?
This is actually comical. What exactly is it that you like about that post? It was awful and even THIRD PARTY admitted it. Dolby tried to jump on the Entropy bandwagon that the lyncher started and gave no sound reasoning for it- you can see above if for some reason you truly believe that Dolby?s push on Entropy was warranted.
Please, do tell.
This is your one of your only reads that I agree with.
You know, I was going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you did not realize that Alexi was scum last game while Aronthaer was town.
But then you said ?Based on a single post? ??????
She quoted five posts in that post you linked. Aronthaer was giving several excuses for not posting/ contributing, yet he was posting in other threads. He did not just say that he would and didn?t follow through once, but multiple times.
Only four reads in and this is the second time you have mentioned that you will need to re-read someone. Why not just analyze someone properly in the first place?
This is your other read that I agree with.
My only problem with it is that you are saying that like Entropy did not already point it out- do you not know what a pocket is? Because that is what Ashtot was trying to do there.
You realize that if you would have just explained why, I might not be here right now.
Literally what the hell. This is driving me insane.
WHY THIS THE READ YOU CHOOSE TO EXPAND ON THE MOST? How is this useful from even YOUR OWN perspective? It is not like anyone was trying to even lynch Nightmares at that point???
Please elaborate or I will just continue to draw the conclusion that you tried to fill in your pretty post with lots of text so that you can placate us by justifying yourself because you have given us ?reads".
Again, expands on her town reads more than her scumreads.
Already made a separate post on why this is so wrong.
The only justification I can see for why you did not expand on some of your scumreads is because you included it in the Nightmares post, but that makes your post extremely awkward to read and also does not allow your scumreads to properly answer or address what you said.
You know, at least you admit that this is extremely lacking. And naturally, you never expanded on the ones that you said you wanted to look into.
Null:
Ares:
Entirely avoidant of the thread. I can count all their posts on my fingers.
You can not use the ?Oh I?m so busy!!? excuse because you have posted literally everywhere on the entire rest of the forum. You said you would give us reads and then continue to coast and do nothing.
Why the hell would we when you?ve done nothing all game?
This is the only reason I have to not suspect you. Because you voted for Crys and your interactions with each other. If you had done this to anyone but mafia, then I would be thinking the opposite.
Consider yourself lucky.
I will finish this up tonight and I expect responses from people that I am addressing.
I am certain scum is within the Inkling bandwagon. However, I do not think mafia would be so bold as to lead the lynch, so I have a slight town lean on Cadbbury considering they also mentioned Inkling as scummy the previous day. I also do not think that the entire scum team is on Inkling?s bandwagon, because that is very short-sighted.
Inkling (9)
Mother of all Llamas
Cory
Tardis2016
Nightmares
*Tina (1)
Ashtot
Cory
Very likely scum:
Mother of all Llamas:
Textbook Grade F bandwagoning, coasted through the game, matching exactly with their mafia meta that posts the minimum requirement as to not be modkilled.
Attempting to justify their bandwagon on Ares. But there were PLENTY of others that had ?confident? answers to the RQS, including even Dolby- so it is blindly apparent they are trying to come up with anything to jump on the easy lynch. Over confident and forced are strange words to put together: if anything, THAT sentence is what feels forced. Considering you have no actual reasoning
I actually laughed at that second line, because it is truly hilarious and beyond hypocritical. You are the one that is trying to blend in with the others, you are the one jumping on bandwagons without your own reasoning. Not once have you formed your own opinions on someone that was not influenced by everyone else that was bandwagoning them. There is no way that town would do this. You also did not even bother to try to explain your opinion on Tina, you are just throwing out random **** and attempting to see what sticks.
Of course, does neither of those things.
Top kek.
All I hear is ?baaaaaaaaa"
Yet again, jumping in on one of the bandwagons very late into Day phase, only a few hours before voting ends.
YOU ARE THE ONE THAT IS SHEEPING. Literally name one of your votes all game that has not been sheeping others reads? You have not posted in depth reads the entire game. You are the one that is perfectly matching your scum meta, you are the one pushing for the easy lynch by voting Ares on D1. Indecisiveness is not even scummy, in fact usually it indicates not knowing what to do- which is typically actually more town behavior than scum. Scum is known to flip flop, but Cadberry was explaining why throughout each and every one of their votes. You have said nothing but trying to disguise the fact that you are
And finally, what I believe is one of the scummiest things anyone has said during the entire game: asking third party if they would side with the mafia. I literally tried to figure out what town-sided motivation anyone would ever have to ask this question, and the only answer would be if it was one of their first few games. However, Mother of all Llamas is not new to the game. OF COURSE he would if it met meeting his win condition sooner, that is literally his job in the game and town needs to lynch mafia not him so this question is just an attempt at extending an olive branch to Tom for the future.
There would be no reason to ask this question if you are really town. If you cannot provide actual reasoning why this question felt like it was something important for you to ask, you are almost definitely scum.
Leaning scum:
Tina:
I refrained from reading them in hopes that their post quality would pick up. Let?s just say I am let down.
Hello!
Sat at a train station right now and I won't have my laptop until I go home tomorrow. Will plug in my iPad when I get to my folks (impromptu trip when Dad told me he was making pulled pork for dinner lol) and try post something before Day ends.
There is nothing wrong with this exactly, but then they do not contribute before Day ends. Were you setting up your excuse in advance in case there was a mislynch? Oh, but you had time to post a one-liner at night?
Don't they always?
Why do you feel the need to constantly excuse yourself?
Now onto the shiny part we had all been waiting for. I commend you for your organization and use of color, it almost made me overlook the fact that the majority of your reads have little substance.
Notice how they?re almost entirely scumreads: town reading only four people, scum reading 12, null reading 2. What really is disturbing about these reads is that the most expanded ones are on their TOWNREADS. The longest read in the entire post in on Nightmares, who is their townread. This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Basically you are just trying to give us a wall of text so it looks like what you are saying is contributing when in reality, you have given us nothing.
If you are leaning interpreting something as a joke then why is that grounds to include in your post??
If you didn?t isolate someones post when you are reading them what did you do?
This is actually comical. What exactly is it that you like about that post? It was awful and even THIRD PARTY admitted it. Dolby tried to jump on the Entropy bandwagon that the lyncher started and gave no sound reasoning for it- you can see above if for some reason you truly believe that Dolby?s push on Entropy was warranted.
Please, do tell.
This is your one of your only reads that I agree with.
You know, I was going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you did not realize that Alexi was scum last game while Aronthaer was town.
But then you said ?Based on a single post? ??????
She quoted five posts in that post you linked. Aronthaer was giving several excuses for not posting/ contributing, yet he was posting in other threads. He did not just say that he would and didn?t follow through once, but multiple times.
Only four reads in and this is the second time you have mentioned that you will need to re-read someone. Why not just analyze someone properly in the first place?
This is your other read that I agree with.
My only problem with it is that you are saying that like Entropy did not already point it out- do you not know what a pocket is? Because that is what Ashtot was trying to do there.
You realize that if you would have just explained why, I might not be here right now.
Literally what the hell. This is driving me insane.
WHY THIS THE READ YOU CHOOSE TO EXPAND ON THE MOST? How is this useful from even YOUR OWN perspective? It is not like anyone was trying to even lynch Nightmares at that point???
Please elaborate or I will just continue to draw the conclusion that you tried to fill in your pretty post with lots of text so that you can placate us by justifying yourself because you have given us ?reads".
Again, expands on her town reads more than her scumreads.
Already made a separate post on why this is so wrong.
The only justification I can see for why you did not expand on some of your scumreads is because you included it in the Nightmares post, but that makes your post extremely awkward to read and also does not allow your scumreads to properly answer or address what you said.
You know, at least you admit that this is extremely lacking. And naturally, you never expanded on the ones that you said you wanted to look into.
Null:
Ares:
Entirely avoidant of the thread. I can count all their posts on my fingers.
You can not use the ?Oh I?m so busy!!? excuse because you have posted literally everywhere on the entire rest of the forum. You said you would give us reads and then continue to coast and do nothing.
Why the hell would we when you?ve done nothing all game?
This is the only reason I have to not suspect you. Because you voted for Crys and your interactions with each other. If you had done this to anyone but mafia, then I would be thinking the opposite.
Consider yourself lucky.
Can't wait for the rest of those vanilla townies to come out of the woodwork :^)
To those that have not already, please claim your role (not just your rolename)
Mother of all Llamas - Talia VT
Ashtot - Otharon (Veteran)
Jacob - Vangarre
Tom - Tyrea, Lyncher/Survivor
Nightmares - Desiree
Hayden - Kenny
Cory - Juju VT
Xine - Miqol VT
Tardis2016 - ?
Cadbberry - Rozeal VT
Mother of all Llamas - Talia VT
Ashtot - Otharon (Veteran)
Jacob - Vangarre
Tom - Tyrea, Lyncher/Survivor
Nightmares - Desiree
Hayden - Kenny
Cory - Juju VT
Xine - Miqol VT
Tardis2016 - ?
Cadbberry - Rozeal VT
Why would you say that he is SK? There are no kills that suggest that being true.
- - - Post Merge - - -
To anyone that is familiar with Xenoblade, please list which claims you think are most likely to be safeclaims in order from most likely to least likely.
I will try to do some research myself, but the Wiki lists people alphabetically and not in relevant order.
Similar threads
- Locked
